Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
What sort of dumbass would post something that completely makes their opponent's argument?
Oppressor/oppressed is a Marxist framework that other people built on. You realize that Lenin talked about oppressor nations and oppressed nations which is not proletariat vs bourgeoisie right?
I can’t argue with someone who is illiterate. Have fun bud.
Oppressor/oppressed is a Marxist framework that other people built on. You realize that Lenin talked about oppressor nations and oppressed nations which is not proletariat vs bourgeoisie right?
I can’t argue with someone who is illiterate. Have fun bud.
Probably a good idea for you to stop embarrassing yourself with posts that support my position while calling me stupid.
Oppressor/oppressed is a Marxist framework that other people built on.You realize that Lenin talked about oppressor nations and oppressed nations which is not proletariat vs bourgeoisie right?
I can’t argue with someone who is illiterate. Have fun bud.
Is there somewhere you can quote where I push back on the bolded?
I never said it wasn't something that came out of Marxism. That doesn't make it Marxism and especially not when Marxists abhore identity politics.
D2, let's rewind the tape. Can you agree now that my original statement and every subsequent post is accurate?
Would you agree that regardless of anything said 180 years ago, that if Marxists generally abhore identity politics and if the opporessor/oppressed is used today in an ip format, that it would not be the same thing as proletariat/boog?
I don't agree that what you've said is accurate, not least of all because there is a significant overlap between Marxists and those who practice identity politics, at least as it relates to the oppressor/oppressed paradigm.
And as you know perfectly well, when someone says conversationally "x is the same thing as y" it doesn't mean that x and y are identical in every possible respect, it means they are sufficiently similar for the purposes of the conversation in question to be used interchangeably. "2,2" is not "the same" as "3,1", but they are "the same" if all you care about is that the sum is 4.
It’s like me saying, “affirming the consequent is always invalid” and luckbox says “well these two people affirm the consequent in different ways, so it’s not the same argument”. It’s a nonsequitor.
I don't agree that what you've said is accurate, not least of all because there is a significant overlap between Marxists and those who practice identity politics, at least as it relates to the oppressor/oppressed paradigm.And as you know perfectly well, when someone says conversationally "x is the same thing as y" it doesn't mean that x and y are identical in every possible re
D2: "hey if Lucium would have them all executed then that's good enough for me".
For the actual Marxists these distinctions are however a big deal and lots of ink has been spilled on explaining why they are important.
For the actual Marxists these distinctions are however a big deal and lots of ink has been spilled on explaining why they are important.
Oh my, you mean to tell me that the word police are... policing words used to describe them? Well, knock me down with a feather, this is the most shocking thing that's happened since the last time Trump tweeted something completely ******ed.
Aren't you one of the word police? Or just an enthusiastic amateur?
That as well And teh spelling department
Oh my, you mean to tell me that the word police are... policing words used to describe them? Well, knock me down with a feather, this is the most shocking thing that's happened since the last time Trump tweeted something completely ******ed.
No that's not what I'm saying at all. Try googling 'identity politics and Marxism' and learn something today.
Hey everyone!
I would like all Moderators to look into a situation that has happened in the SE thread specifically the ongoing NFL threads. I have been banned to a containment thread by AllinMcloven however I have done nothing wrong. A couple trouble maker posters wanted me banned based off my political leanings from other threads. AIM replied by saying that I had not broken any rules. These posters continued to press AIM at which time he created the containment thread. I DM'd AIM and asked for an explanation. He said I was being "incendiary" and "Trolling". I asked him for evidence but he was either unwilling or unable to produce it. He said he made a "Judgement call". What actually happened was he was pressured into doing this by other posters. Here is a little context.
1) AIM has said he is "hands off" regarding moderation. He has said numerous times that he likes the drama and back and forth between posters. When it comes to me, however, this does not apply. Have any of you been apart of a football thread where there was some **** talking going on? Apparently when I do it it is call being "incendiary".
2) AIM told other posters in the thread not to respond to me in a separate situation even though once again I had done nothing wrong. He later reversed this after I contacted him and he realized he was wrong.
3) AIM has a strange relationship with poster SRM. He clearly favors him. SRM has threatened posters and on numerous occasions told posters to kill themselves and yet AIM let this go. Do any of you familiar with SRMs posts think he is an "incendiary" poster?
The bottom line is that I do not deserve to be treated this way. AIM is simply flexing for his favorite posters. I'd love for you to get your eyes on my posting in these threads. Is what I wrote really out of line? Imagine feeling the need to create a containment thread for someone who maybe posts in there once or twice in a week. This silencing people is becoming a dangerous precedent.
Please feel free to ask me any questions. I invite AIM to come in here and explain himself.
I have taken a screen shot of this post in case someone wants to retaliate against me.
Hey everyone!I would like all Moderators to look into a situation that has happened in the SE thread specifically the ongoing NFL threads. I have been banned to a containment thread by AllinMcloven however I have done nothing wrong. A couple trouble maker posters wanted me banned based off my political leanings from other threads. AIM replied by saying that I had not broken a
Not only is this insufferable whiner complaining about moderation (and SRM!) in every forum he participates in, he's too dumb to even do it in the right place.
Mong, why do the mods in every forum keep singling you out when you never do anything wrong? It really is an intractable mystery, like cats landing on their feet or the tides going in and out.
Hey everyone!I would like all Moderators to look into a situation that has happened in the SE thread specifically the ongoing NFL threads. I have been banned to a containment thread by AllinMcloven however I have done nothing wrong. A couple trouble maker posters wanted me banned based off my political leanings from other threads. AIM replied by saying that I had not broken a
All in mclovin is basically widely recognized as the best active 2p2 mod and your reputation is yours as well
Not only is this insufferable whiner complaining about moderation (and SRM!) in every forum he participates in, he's too dumb to even do it in the right place.
Mong, why do the mods in every forum keep singling you out when you never do anything wrong? It really is an intractable mystery, like cats landing on their feet or the tides going in and out.
I have sometimes done things wrong. When I don't do something wrong and then get unfairly treated I speak up. Also, Mods make mistakes. I gave AIM plenty of opportunity to make this right.