Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
lol, how much time did you spend skimming my post history to find a year old post in the bodybuilding forum of all places that's only remotely controversial to an utter closet case prude as yourself and you try to play it off as if my analysis is not spot on 😀
I remembered you saying something disgusting to me years ago in RGT, so was seeing if there's a pattern with your weird "hot takes."
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
In RGT you responded to a post of mine with:
I can sense your erection from here buddy
Wait... lagtight is celibate? So far, every Christian I've known who was outspoken about homosexuals and celibate were actually self-loathing gays. n=shitload
Wait... lagtight is celibate? So far, every Christian I've known who was outspoken about homosexuals and celibate were actually self-loathing gays. n=shitload
Wait... lagtight is celibate? So far, every Christian I've known who was outspoken about homosexuals and celibate were actually self-loathing gays. n=shitload
One of the (many) problems with Rickroll's theory, is that I didn't become a believer until age 30. That is, I was celibate my entire life even before becoming a Christian.
Like I said earlier, the only person obsessed with this topic is rickroll!
He wasn't outspoken against gays. That's the main qualifier otherwise it could just be some dude with an embarrassing extreme case of Peyronie's.
He wasn't outspoken against gays. That's the main qualifier otherwise it could just be some dude with an embarrassing extreme case of Peyronie's.
I think you missed my point. He's not just currently celibate. He's never tried.
One of the (many) problems with Rickroll's theory, is that I didn't become a believer until age 30. That is, I was celibate my entire life even before becoming a Christian.
Is that supposed to make you seem less bizarre?
Serious Question for the Moderators:
Are posters allowed to make false accusations about other posters in this Forum regarding personal matters?
That's what rickroll is clearly doing.
If it's allowed, so be it.
One of the (many) problems with Rickroll's theory, is that I didn't become a believer until age 30. That is, I was celibate my entire life even before becoming a Christian.
Like I said earlier, the only person obsessed with this topic is rickroll!
The key here is did you think gay relationships are wrong, etc., before you became a faux Christian?
I see. That makes it even more suspicious.
Rickroll has some 'interesting' hot-takes:https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
I mean I don’t really agree with the quoted paragraph, but if you’re trying to beat the “closeted gay” allegations, trying to use the fact that rick likes sex with random women as a way to discredit him is pretty gay.
I mean I don’t really agree with the quoted paragraph, but if you’re trying to beat the “closeted gay” allegations, trying to use the fact that rick likes sex with random women as a way to discredit him is pretty gay.
Of course it is impossible to prove (or disprove) "closeted gay" allegations in an anonymous forum.
I chose that example because rickroll seems to have a pattern of 'hot takes' that make little sense.
Maybe a Licensed Mental Health Care professional in this forum can explain rickroll's obsession with me.
Just a head's up: using the phrase "pretty gay" is probably a bannable offense.
What makes little sense about getting a hand job on a quiet side street to you?
You believe, much as a child might, in a sky faerie/Adult Santa Clause that sends people to heaven or to hell for eternity based on whatever arbitrary characteristics said faerie finds offensive. Stop talking about mother****ing LOGIC. It's deeply offensive.
You believe, much as a child might, in a sky faerie/Adult Santa Clause that sends people to heaven or to hell for eternity based on whatever arbitrary characteristics said faerie finds offensive. Stop talking about mother****ing LOGIC. It's deeply offensive.
STRAWMAN FALLACY ALERT!!!
Makes sense that you would find talking about logic offensive.
One of the (many) problems with Rickroll's theory, is that I didn't become a believer until age 30. That is, I was celibate my entire life even before becoming a Christian.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
every new detail you share about your life brings us a little bit of delightful insight into how you reached such a remarkably high level in being a pathetic dork-ass loser and social fascist
Of course it is impossible to prove (or disprove) "closeted gay" allegations in an anonymous forum.I chose that example because rickroll seems to have a pattern of 'hot takes' that make little sense.Maybe a Licensed Mental Health Care professional in this forum can explain rickroll's obsession with me.Just a head's up: using the phrase "pretty gay" is probably a bannable offen
I am part-gay, I can say it.
Honestly I do think people can be celibate and not be weird, they’re called asexuals.
Well lawyers can go to court and defend clients, not everyone can. I find this to be a bit of a cliche that doesn’t track to real situations.
We're talking about what language one can use in a public forum. I don't understand the analogy.
Is it your opinion that an African-American should be allowed to use the n-word, but white folks should not be allowed to?
We're talking about what language one can use in a public forum. I don't understand the analogy.
Is it your opinion that an African-American should be allowed to use the n-word, but white folks should not be allowed to?
It’s not an analogy. You put a proposition on the table in the form of “if x then y” and I just showed that the proposition evaluates to false.
I think that people probably should not use the N-word if they’re not black, but it’s mostly because of the harm it causes. I think intent is usually different when white people use the term vs Black people.
Just like if you called it “pretty gay” you’re using it as an insult. I was using it as a descriptor.
