USA Goes to War Against Iran
USA Goes to War Against Iran
8
zs

USA Goes to War Against Iran

Time for a dedicated thread to the war.

How long will it last and what will be the probable outcome?

02 March 2026 at 06:37 PM
Reply...

5346 Replies

8
zs


by A Stupid Rapist m

You fell for the clickbait.

Were is the part where I feel for the clickbate?


by Trolly McTrollson m

Ya, no **** dude, you're a raving genocidal Nazi who wants to wipe Palestinians off the face of the Earth, ofc you aren't concerned with "virtue signaling" or basic human decency.

I don’t think the Palestinians should be killed and exterminated wholesale. I think that moving them away from Israel would be infinitely more humane and mutually beneficial than the present situation or advocated for resistance by any means and forever war.


by Trolly McTrollson m

Ya, no **** dude, you're a raving genocidal Nazi who wants to wipe Palestinians off the face of the Earth, ofc you aren't concerned with "virtue signaling" or basic human decency.

The geonocide was attempted on Oct 7th.

Also, Palestinians want to wipe Jews off the face of the Earth. Did you know that?


by DoyleBrunsonFan m

I don’t think the Palestinians should be killed and exterminated wholesale. I think that moving them away from Israel would be infinitely more humane and mutually beneficial than the present situation or advocated for resistance by any means and forever war.

They don’t want to go anywhere. They like to wallow in their self pity.


by weeeez m

I'm replying to this and when I'm quoting this I can see you pasted a tweet but it doesn't show on my page.
Idk why, basically all I see is your sentence and no tweet.
Seems to be happening a lot with your posts, I see either part of the post or just blank post.

I'm using firefox.

edit: wtf even after I quote you I can't see the tweet.
halp!

you can copy the tweet id from the quote and paste it here.

x.com/anyuser/status/{{tweetId}}

x.com/anyuser/status/2043446603558650185

this happens to me a lot too. I thought it was for violent content. not sure why this one is troublesome.


by DoyleBrunsonFan m

I don’t think the Palestinians should be killed and exterminated wholesale. I think that moving them away from Israel would be infinitely more humane and mutually beneficial than the present situation or advocated for resistance by any means and forever war.

why should the natives be forced to move? how about moving the European invaders?


by Elway m

This post makes no sense.

The US should have taken out Iran long before they became a missile fortress. We finally have a President willing to do the right thing. Middle Easterners should never have a nuke except Israel.

Not sure how that would render my post senseless.

But yeah if the US wanted to take out Iran they needed to do it 20 years ago before cheap drones and accurate hypersonic missiles became a thing. And that was the plan. Search YouTube for "Wesley Clark 7 counties 5 years". They got way too bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq for that to be possible though.


So the US plan is to seize Japanese, Chinese, and Indian ships now?

Looks like they're taking the WWIII option.


by DoyleBrunsonFan m
by Trolly McTrollson m

Ya, no **** dude, you're a raving genocidal Nazi who wants to wipe Palestinians off the face of the Earth, ofc you aren't concerned with "virtue signaling" or basic human decency.

I don’t think the Palestinians should be killed and exterminated wholesale. I think that moving them away from Israel ...

This is ethic cleansing by definition, FYI.


by geezerchess m

Please don't give Trump any ideas. Thanking you in advance.

You don't get to say any of this chit until you're in a place where if you had a chance to vote all over again, knowing what you know today and must vote for either Harris or Trump, you wouldn't select Trump again. Until then, shaaddup about Trump.

by DoyleBrunsonFan m

I predict Iran will not be allowed to hold the rest of the globe hostage and closing the strait pressure a lot more parties than just the US.

That's how world wars get started. But it was all worth it because they held signs that read death to America that hurt your muh feels, lmfao.

by DoyleBrunsonFan m

However, we are at the mercy of Trump and there’s always a chance he comes to a deal that is good for him but bad for everyone else.

By bad for everyone else, do you mean countries or people? Dude definitely does chit that is bad for the masses in the US but you haven't noticed because you can't see beyond your own experiences.

by StoppedRainingMen m

Important to remember that while Vance was storming out of negotiations, trump was at a ufc event asking dana white why a fighter isn’t on his vanity card for the White House event

Trump sent, as the lead negotiator for the US, the guy who told Zelensky multiple times during a negotiation that he should be thanking Trump. There was no genuine negotiation attempt; this was Trump stalling to reload, manipulate markets, or both.


by Luckbox Inc m

So the US plan is to seize Japanese, Chinese, and Indian ships now?

Looks like they're taking the WWIII option.

Ok... apparently it's just going to be ships using Iranian ports. I had read that it was going to be any ships paying tolls.

Regardless it would seem that instead of opening the strait which was presumably what Trump had wanted, it'll now be closed completely.


by Land O Lakes m

You don't get to say any of this chit until you're in a place where if you had a chance to vote all over again, knowing what you know today and must vote for either Harris or Trump, you wouldn't select Trump again. Until then, shaaddup about Trump.

I only have to take marching orders from coordi, crossnerd and king spew. You have no influence whatsoever over what I choose to post. Deal with it, Buster Brown!!


This reminds me of how Carter put up solar panels on the White House and Reagan immediately tore them down

Half a century later, still addicted to oil...


by DoyleBrunsonFan m

Unsurprisingly, the segment doesn’t suggest that Iran outsmarted the Pentagon. I’m not sure who the tweeter is, seems to be some deranged tech bro who retweets Fox News segments.

Actually it is a pro IRGC account that came out of nowhere and is suddenly all over the place. I get their posts all the time. Meaning there is some serious coordinated bot activity pushing it.

Most of what they post is complete bullshit. The kind of account that was posting Tel Aviv was decimated and Bibi was dead.

At some point whoever is pushing the psyop will move on and the account will disappear never to be heard from again.


by TeflonDawg m

This reminds me of how Carter put up solar panels on the White House and Reagan immediately tore them downHalf a century later, still addicted to oil...

Throw in no sunset clause and no supporting proxy paramilitaries undermining other countries in the ME and I am sold.


by Luckbox Inc m

Ok... apparently it's just going to be ships using Iranian ports. I had read that it was going to be any ships paying tolls.

Regardless it would seem that instead of opening the strait which was presumably what Trump had wanted, it'll now be closed completely.

Or China will give the IRGC a call and the straits will be open for all.

Alternatively shipping will resume as normal with escort, and the rest of the world will dare the IRGC to escalate.

I think you completely over estimate Iranian leverage and (hopefully) over estimate the appetite and capacity to escalate. And your contention any "ally" of the IRGC will do anything more than covertly supply the IRGC is absurd.

Regardless there will be no WW3 because no one will join Iran (except their own paramilitaries in Iraq and Yemen). The worst that will happen is that Iran will be bombed back to the Stone Age and the GCC countries and world economy will take a solid hit. And that is the worst. The most likely outcome is parties come back to the table and a deal is made.


by Trolly McTrollson m

This is ethic cleansing by definition, FYI.

You don't say !!!




by geezerchess m

I only have to take marching orders from coordi, crossnerd and king spew. You have no influence whatsoever over what I choose to post. Deal with it, Buster Brown!!

Yes, and I'll continue to tell you when and why you're full of chit.

by Dunyain m

The worst that will happen is that Iran will be bombed back to the Stone Age and the GCC countries and world economy will take a solid hit. And that is the worst. The most likely outcome is parties come back to the table and a deal is made.

You should start a new account and name it Dunning-Kruger.


by Dunyain m

You don't say !!!


youre kind of giving up the game here


Trump manipulating the markets for fun and profit is exactly what should be expected I suppose


Iran has screwed itself. Now there are three mega projects that will make going through the strait not necessary. A canal is being built through Oman as one of the projects. No one will want to work with Iran again. I hope the US takes over Kharg and starves the country to death.


by Luckbox Inc m

Ok... apparently it's just going to be ships using Iranian ports. I had read that it was going to be any ships paying tolls.

Regardless it would seem that instead of opening the strait which was presumably what Trump had wanted, it'll now be closed completely.

Getting their banks back open is way more critical to Iran than keeping the Strait closed. President Pezeshkian has already warned that without access to a financial lifeline, the country’s economy could face a β€œtotal collapse” within a couple of weeks.

The rial is in freefall, forcing the government to issue a new 10 million rial banknote simply so Iranians can carry enough cash without needing wheelbarrows. Meanwhile, food and essential goods prices have surged by 100–200%. ATMs in major cities are bone-dry. The collapse of negotiations has also left tens of billions in frozen funds that Iran desperately needs to stabilize its currency and meet government payrolls, etc etc etc.

And to make matters worse, a record drought is straining their power and water infrastructure, with Pezeshkian raising the possibility of "evacuating Tehran" if significant rainfall doesn’t arrive soon.


by Land O Lakes m

Yes, and I'll continue to tell you when and why you're full of chit.

I look forward to that!


by Elway m

Iran has screwed itself. Now there are three mega projects that will make going through the strait not necessary. A canal is being built through Oman as one of the projects. No one will want to work with Iran again. I hope the US takes over Kharg and starves the country to death.

Not at all surprising that a date-rapist would be devoid of any and all compassion.


by John21 m

Getting their banks back open is way more critical to Iran than keeping the Strait closed. President Pezeshkian has already warned that without access to a financial lifeline, the country’s economy could face a β€œtotal collapse” within a couple of weeks.The rial is in freefall, forcing the government to issue a new 10 million rial banknote simply so Iranians can carry enough cas

Oh, man... you would think Trump could easily close a deal and they wouldn't be holding out while Trump is throwing a tantrum. You can always tell who has the BATNA in a negotiation: it's the side throwing a tantrum.

Reply...