Do you finally regret supporting Donald Trump?
No supporting OP needed
CNN and MSNOW have lower combined average viewership than FOX alone
This puts your lack of insight on the subject into full display
Because FOX gets less viewership than Joe Rogan
CNN and MSNOW as entities have less reach than Nick Fuentes
You guys legitimately have your heads buried in the sand if you think there isn't a drastic and outright abusive information asymmetry
aLL oF tHe iNForRmaTioN fLoWs
When I'm looking for news outlets to give me the cold hard facts I turn to CNN, MSNOW, and Hollywood.
and of course my Twitter feed which I'll complain about to everyone but can't look away from
lol at thinking nick fuentes has more reach than cnn
Do you have an argument why with future technology it will be impossible for natal males to become pregnant? Or any evidence?
It's impossible on its face, by definition. Any 'research' with that aim would be unethical for a number of obvious reasons, not least because it would address no medical need. Frankenstein stuff.
The ability for democrats to effectively communicate has been kneecapped by relentless right wing propaganda. The right controls all of the information flows and you are just another victim of the machine
May god have mercy on our souls
This is EXACTLY it. We say THEY'RE NOT EATING CATS AND DOGS, until we're blue in the face and then they just move on to the next outrageous lie. It's a relentless assault on the truth 24/7 and it just doesn't matter that we counter every single lie, they just create 10 more. It never stops and the stupid and bad people eat it up and have now put the absolute worst and incompetent administration in charge in the history of this country.
This is EXACTLY it. We say THEY'RE NOT EATING CATS AND DOGS, until we're blue in the face and then they just move on to the next outrageous lie. It's a relentless assault on the truth 24/7 and it just doesn't matter that we counter every single lie, they just create 10 more. It never stops and the stupid and bad people eat it up and have now put the absolute worst and incompet
so why don't we consider a different strategy?
about a million americans file for medical bankruptcy each year - these are often people who had insurance
we have by far the most broken healthcare system of any wealthy nation
and yet instead of focusing on fixing that, the messaging is "it's so great and wonderful, mission accomplished, now we gotta focus on providing free healthcare to illegals"
You're conflating "free healthcare for all" with "free healthcare for illegals."
This makes you a useful puppet for Republican propogandists.
jfc you guys are thickheaded - i've been abundantly clear that i'm speaking for why trump won the popular vote, not what my personal beliefs are
do you also think everyone who visits the house where anne frank hid are role playing as nazi jew hunters?
jfc you guys are thickheaded - i've been abundantly clear that i'm speaking for why trump won the popular vote, not what my personal beliefs are
do you also think everyone who visits the house where anne frank hid are role playing as nazi jew hunters?
Lmao. You sound more like a dude who answered the door and said, "There are no Jews here, but if you're going to destroying my entire house looking for any, check the attic first."
It's impossible on its face, by definition. Any 'research' with that aim would be unethical for a number of obvious reasons, not least because it would address no medical need. Frankenstein stuff.
So your argument is that it’s impossible a priori? Or that it’s impossible analytically? Because both of those are not true. Natalie males of other species do become females and perform the female role in reproduction, so it’s obviously not true by definition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequential...
And as far as it being a priori, observations of what is possible for males and females to do are a posteriori, so I doubt you could eliminate the possibility a priori.
Edit: As for the latter points about it being unethical, that would obviously not lead to the conclusion that it was impossible. Reason being there are plenty of examples of unethical things that are not impossible.
Lmao. You sound more like a dude who answered the door and said, "There are no Jews here, but if you're going to destroying my entire house looking for any, check the attic first."
yep, here we go, you show your true colors that you're nothing but a surface level thinker who's not only too stupid to understand the difference between espousing a view and explaining the viewpoint of others and you top that wonderful inadequacy off nicely by being a hateful pos
jfc you guys are thickheaded - i've been abundantly clear that i'm speaking for why trump won the popular vote, not what my personal beliefs are
do you also think everyone who visits the house where anne frank hid are role playing as nazi jew hunters?
Trump won because we are stupid and bad and extremely gullible. I don't really want democrats to throw up their hands and say, "oh well, maybe we just need to be stupider and worse ".
yep, here we go, you show your true colors that you're nothing but a surface level thinker who's not only too stupid to understand the difference between espousing a view and explaining the viewpoint of others and you top that wonderful inadequacy off nicely by being a hateful pos
If you have to resort to an ad hominem, perhaps you lack the ability to explain your position clearly? Maybe, instead of everyone being thick-headed, you just suck at using words?
The fact you think the strategy of demonizing immigrants by Republicans and then campaigning on that demonization is some groundbreaking-level insight is lmao.
If you have to resort to an ad hominem, perhaps you lack the ability to explain your position clearly? Maybe, instead of everyone being thick-headed, you just suck at using words?
The fact you think the strategy of demonizing immigrants by Republicans and then campaigning on that demonization is some groundbreaking-level insight is lmao.
how rich after alluding to me being a nazi you accuse me of being ad hominem because you're literally too dumb to understand the difference between understanding an ideology and believing one
how rich after alluding to me being a nazi you accuse me of being ad hominem because you're literally too dumb to understand the difference between understanding an ideology and believing one
Lol. I didn't imply you were a Nazi. I said you sounded like a person that would be kind enough to hide Jews but spineless enough not to go the distance. That was not an attack on you, but an attack on your ******ed Holocaust analogy.
bb it's stuff like this which is exactly what i'm talking about - if you even spent a minute with those people you'd know conversations like this never take place in the real world
Some of us know Trumpers IRL. While that pic is an exaggeration, the ******ation is on point. I had one tell me that he blames the Dems for Trump running all over Congress because if they weren't so corrupt, they would have the majority in the House and it would keep Trump in check. But he literally voted all red on his ballot.
