Do you finally regret supporting Donald Trump?

Do you finally regret supporting Donald Trump?

No supporting OP needed

07 March 2026 at 02:49 AM
Reply...

557 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by geezerchess

I believe P1 is false.

But I don't want to get permd, so I won't pursue this further.

Maybe we can pursue this in another forum?

You believe it’s false based off of how the terms are used in the argument or you believe it’s false based off an equivocation of how the terms are being used?


by Victor

they arent females

They are at least females before transitioning.


by checkraisdraw

P1 If it is possible for some trans men to get pregnant, then it is possible for some men to get pregnant.
P2 It is possible for some trans men to get pregnant
C It is possible for some men to get pregnant.

^ Which premise of this valid argument do you disagree with.

If you want to say the Bible is a good guide to morality you're kinda forced to admit men can get pregnant.


by campfirewest

A better question is do you regret supporting a DEI candidate who reached her position in life by giving blowjobs, which enabled to an incompetent grifting cheetco-head to become President again?

clearly campfire does NOT regret voting for Trump


Pretty sure it’s Trump who is accused of giving blowjobs to Bill Clinton, not Kamala.


by coordi

I could also just enforce your permaban



by ecriture d'adulte

If you want to say the Bible is a good guide to morality you're kinda forced to admit men can get pregnant.

No men get pregnant in the Bible, and the idea is specifically mocked in Jeremiah 30:6.


by StoppedRainingMen

I will sign over the deed to my house if you can prove that post was ‘wishing death on folks’

Since I can't literally PROVE that's what you meant, I retract my statement with apologies.

Failing that I expect you to choke on your own dick

But you do unambiguously wish bad things to happen to some folks who post here.

Anyhoo, happy trolling!


by geezerchess

Since I can't literally PROVE that's what you meant, I retract my statement with apologies.

But you do unambiguously wish bad things to happen to some folks who post here.

Anyhoo, happy trolling!

you're the guy who posted it seems okay to wish cancer upon everyone.

you're the biggest troll in town.


So what you’re saying is you are claiming I’m wishing death on posters while immediately saying ‘oh I guess you aren’t wishing death on posters’

Your feebility is strong, piggy


by ecriture d'adulte

If you want to say the Bible is a good guide to morality you're kinda forced to admit men can get pregnant.

Men can't get pregnant.


by Tuma

you're the guy who posted it seems okay to wish cancer upon everyone.

you're the biggest troll in town.

Huh?? I have never wished death on ANYONE. What in the name of Ned are you babbling about?


https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...




To be technically fair, cancer isn’t always death


by StoppedRainingMen

So what you’re saying is you are claiming I’m wishing death on posters while immediately saying ‘oh I guess you aren’t wishing death on posters’

Your feebility is strong, piggy

Yes, a brief PM with Coordi convinced me that your use of that phrase "choke on you d****" is NOT necessarily wishing death on someone. Hence, my earlier apology to you.


Also lol, pigman the Bible hoarder definitely wasn’t counting on a receipt that readily available


dude can't keep track of his own idiocy.


by corpus vile

Men can't get pregnant.

Which premise of my argument do you disagree with?


by d2_e4

Obviously I had to take you off ignore to view this post apparently


by 57 On Red

No men get pregnant in the Bible, and the idea is specifically mocked in Jeremiah 30:6.

No it's about the pain of labor, not specifically that men cannot get prgnant. And I'm not making some novel argument. Abolitionists have interpreted Galatians 3:28 that there is "neither slave nor free before the eyes of god" to mean that the bible is anti-slavery for hundreds of years. But in the same sentence says their is neither man nor woman. I don;t actually believe Paul was advocating for radical gender equality there, but I also don't think the bible is against owning slaves, which is part of why the bible is not a very good moral guide. Both based on history and plain reading of the text.


My response to your critique of my statement above might be helpful for context:

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

by geezerchess

Of course it's an awful thing to say. But I don't think it violates any forum rule(s), which was the context of my opinion.

These posts were in the Moderation thread. It was a moderation issue, not advocating a particular point-of-view.

#contextmatters


by ecriture d'adulte

No it's about the pain of labor, not specifically that men cannot get prgnant. And I'm not making some novel argument. Abolitionists have interpreted Galatians 3:28 that there is "neither slave nor free before the eyes of god" to mean that the bible is anti-slavery for hundreds of years. But in the same sentence says their is neither man nor woman. I don;t actually bel

The Bible also seems to think there are women’s clothes and men’s clothes/women’s haircuts and men’s haircuts which a lot of the trans critical people would deny lol


by Tuma

dude can't keep track of his own idiocy.

To be honest, this is probably true sometimes. (But not in this particular case.)


by StoppedRainingMen

Also lol, pigman the Bible hoarder definitely wasn’t counting on a receipt that readily available

This post had a short, inglorious shelf-life.

Reply...