Do you finally regret supporting Donald Trump?
No supporting OP needed
I believe P1 is false.
But I don't want to get permd, so I won't pursue this further.
Maybe we can pursue this in another forum?
You believe it’s false based off of how the terms are used in the argument or you believe it’s false based off an equivocation of how the terms are being used?
P1 If it is possible for some trans men to get pregnant, then it is possible for some men to get pregnant.
P2 It is possible for some trans men to get pregnant
C It is possible for some men to get pregnant.
^ Which premise of this valid argument do you disagree with.
If you want to say the Bible is a good guide to morality you're kinda forced to admit men can get pregnant.
Pretty sure it’s Trump who is accused of giving blowjobs to Bill Clinton, not Kamala.
I will sign over the deed to my house if you can prove that post was ‘wishing death on folks’
Since I can't literally PROVE that's what you meant, I retract my statement with apologies.
Failing that I expect you to choke on your own dick
But you do unambiguously wish bad things to happen to some folks who post here.
Anyhoo, happy trolling!
Since I can't literally PROVE that's what you meant, I retract my statement with apologies.
But you do unambiguously wish bad things to happen to some folks who post here.
Anyhoo, happy trolling!
you're the guy who posted it seems okay to wish cancer upon everyone.
you're the biggest troll in town.
So what you’re saying is you are claiming I’m wishing death on posters while immediately saying ‘oh I guess you aren’t wishing death on posters’
Your feebility is strong, piggy
To be technically fair, cancer isn’t always death
So what you’re saying is you are claiming I’m wishing death on posters while immediately saying ‘oh I guess you aren’t wishing death on posters’
Your feebility is strong, piggy
Yes, a brief PM with Coordi convinced me that your use of that phrase "choke on you d****" is NOT necessarily wishing death on someone. Hence, my earlier apology to you.
Also lol, pigman the Bible hoarder definitely wasn’t counting on a receipt that readily available
dude can't keep track of his own idiocy.
No men get pregnant in the Bible, and the idea is specifically mocked in Jeremiah 30:6.
No it's about the pain of labor, not specifically that men cannot get prgnant. And I'm not making some novel argument. Abolitionists have interpreted Galatians 3:28 that there is "neither slave nor free before the eyes of god" to mean that the bible is anti-slavery for hundreds of years. But in the same sentence says their is neither man nor woman. I don;t actually believe Paul was advocating for radical gender equality there, but I also don't think the bible is against owning slaves, which is part of why the bible is not a very good moral guide. Both based on history and plain reading of the text.
My response to your critique of my statement above might be helpful for context:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
Of course it's an awful thing to say. But I don't think it violates any forum rule(s), which was the context of my opinion.
These posts were in the Moderation thread. It was a moderation issue, not advocating a particular point-of-view.
#contextmatters
No it's about the pain of labor, not specifically that men cannot get prgnant. And I'm not making some novel argument. Abolitionists have interpreted Galatians 3:28 that there is "neither slave nor free before the eyes of god" to mean that the bible is anti-slavery for hundreds of years. But in the same sentence says their is neither man nor woman. I don;t actually bel
The Bible also seems to think there are women’s clothes and men’s clothes/women’s haircuts and men’s haircuts which a lot of the trans critical people would deny lol

