Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
Maybe you have some sort of deficiency that doesn't allow you to relate to others but the story was absolutely relevant to you talking about cars running off the road to avoid your off leash dogs
I don't really want to continue the conversation so I will leave it at that
And its worth stating:
That story doesn't insult you in any way. You are seemingly just lashing out at the thought of something bad happening due to your direct actions, which .... is kind of the point
obviously this directly contradicts my prior statement of not continuing the conversation
You made an explicit threat to kill my dog. Of course I would kill you if you did something like that. It shouldn't even really need to be said.
Not sure what 'slagging off' is supposed to mean try speaking American.
No, I didn't threaten to kill your mutt, you're just lying here. I said if your dog either ran out in front of me while driving I'd run over it -especially if it's caused cars to drive off the road over your dumb irresponsible ass- and if your dog attacked me while off his leash due to you being generally irresponsible, Then I'd kill it if need be. I never explicitly proactively made a threat. And you're making veiled threats again right now. Seems you like to test the ban waters. And your veiled threat also actually assumes a lot. Slagging off means insulting, which is what you did with Coordi re his gf and I don't give a ripe **** about your geocentrism either. America isn't the world or universe and other countries use different slang, so deal with it, and try learning Irish slang, you weirdo egomaniac.
You made an explicit threat to kill my dog. Of course I would kill you if you did something like that. It shouldn't even really need to be said. Not sure what 'slagging off' is supposed to mean try speaking American.
No, I didn't threaten to kill your mutt, you're just lying here. I said if your dog either ran out in front of me while driving I'd run over it -especially if it's
The fuck is even going on in this thread? Stop fantasizing about killing someone's dog, ffs.
Maybe you have some sort of deficiency that doesn't allow you to relate to others but the story was absolutely relevant to you talking about cars running off the road to avoid your off leash dogs
I don't really want to continue the conversation so I will leave it at that
What you continue to miss... probably willfully....is that no cars were ever ran off the road because of my dog or my neighbor's dog. As I've said repeatedly, in both instances the cars were completely stopped then deliberately drove into the ditch.
So the story of the dogs running out in front of your gf's car on a main (and presumably paved road) with 45 mph speed limits has absolutely nothing to do with my situation.
You made an explicit threat to kill my dog. Of course I would kill you if you did something like that. It shouldn't even really need to be said.
Not sure what 'slagging off' is supposed to mean try speaking American.
I know your dog is a princess and incapable of doing anything aggressive in your mind, but let's say your dog rolled up on someone aggressively (like some pitts have rolled up on me) in a leash-required area and someone who is legally allowed to carry a firearm domes your dog, you'd try to kill that person?
Maybe you have some sort of deficiency that doesn't allow you to relate to others but the story was absolutely relevant to you talking about cars running off the road to avoid your off leash dogs
I don't really want to continue the conversation so I will leave it at that
No he doesn't have any deficiency, he's just being a trolling prick and I'd appreciate it if the mods ensure he doesn't engage in veiled threats again btw. That might be acceptable if he was 17 but not as a grown ass adult, as it just comes across as him being a apathetic edgelord and it lowers the (admittedly already kinda low) tone of the forum.
I know your dog is a princess and incapable of doing anything aggressive in your mind, but let's say your dog rolled up on someone aggressively (like some pitts have rolled up on me) in a leash-required area and someone who is legally allowed to carry a firearm domes your dog, you'd try to kill that person?
My dog really would just not do something like that though. It's not in her nature. So it's sort of a moot point.
If I did have an aggressive dog I wouldn't be having them be off leash in those sorts of situations but I also wouldn't have an aggressive dog. Huskies are pretty intelligent and she waits for me to give the ok about a person before she approaches them if she approaches them at all.
She's also been incredibly socialized and has met probably a couple thousand people and dogs in her short life. She's not just going to go up a person and attack them.
The **** is even going on in this thread Stop fantasizing about killing someone's dog, ffs.
Hey you and lucky aren't the only ones allowed to troll here. He was trolling for ages about his dumbass mutt and getting a great kick outa up. I simply trolled back, causing him to reveal himself as the addles semi sociopath he is jeez. 🙄 He loves trolling others but loses the plot on an unacceptable level when he gets trolled back which isn't my problem.
Hey you and lucky aren't the only ones allowed to troll here. He was trolling for ages about his dumbass mutt and getting a great kick outa up. I simply trolled back, causing him to reveal himself as the addles semi sociopath he is jeez. 🙄 He loves trolling others but loses the plot on an unacceptable level when he gets trolled back which isn't my problem.
Oh I didn't realize you were just here threatening to kill dogs for fun. Sorry I thought you were serious.
My dog really would just not do something like that though. It's not in her nature. So it's sort of a moot point. If I did have an aggressive dog I wouldn't be having them be off leash in those sorts of situations but I also wouldn't have an aggressive dog. Huskies are pretty intelligent and she waits for me to give the ok about a person before she approaches them if she appro
Dog's an animal, you've no way of knowing with 100% certainty what an animal would do. You're a gobshite. I notice you deflected from answering the point on whether you'd kill someone who shot your dog due to your irresponsibility by not keeping it on a leash, which is yet more trolling from you. I bet if what Land asked actually happened and your dog did get shot by someone with a legally held gun, you'd do two things:
What you continue to miss... probably willfully....is that no cars were ever ran off the road because of my dog or my neighbor's dog. As I've said repeatedly, in both instances the cars were completely stopped then deliberately drove into the ditch.
So when there are no dogs roaming in the middle of the road, people just randomly stop on that road and then deliberately drive into the ditch? If not, then yeah, your fukking dogs do have something to do with it.
But I got a kick out of:
Lunchbox: "We should be able to talk chit about people's family since this is an anonymous forum so who cares."
Also Lunchbox: "Don't talk chit about my dog; she's family."
So when there are no dogs roaming in the middle of the road, people just randomly stop on that road and then deliberately drive into the ditch? If not, then yeah, your fukking dogs do have something to do with it.But I got a kick out of:Lunchbox: "We should be able to talk chit about people's family since this is an anonymous forum so who cares."Also Lunchbox: "Don't talk chit
I didn't say they had nothing to do with it you dumbass.
I said they didn't run the cars off the road. The drivers did that themselves. In the first instance they had their entire lane still and my dog was standing still in the other lane and they drove into the ditch intentionally.
^^
So when there are no dogs roaming in the middle of the road, people just randomly stop on that road and then deliberately drive into the ditch? If not, then yeah, your fukking dogs do have something to do with it.But I got a kick out of:Lunchbox: "We should be able to talk chit about people's family since this is an anonymous forum so who cares."Also Lunchbox: "Don't talk chit
Yeah stopped cars deliberately driving into a ditch is a new level of stupidity even for Lucky. not to mention the fact that he's making this excuse for the same thing happening twice.
Yeah stopped cars deliberately driving into a ditch is a new level of stupidity even for Lucky. not to mention the fact that he's making this excuse for the same thing happening twice.
It did happen twice. The drivers didn't know there was a ditch because the ditch was filled with snow. They assumed it was level with the road and it wasn't.
I didn't say they had nothing to do with it you dumbass.
I said they didn't run the cars off the road. The drivers did that themselves. In the first instance they had their entire lane still and my dog was standing still in the other lane and they drove into the ditch intentionally.
Lmao at "My dogs weren't driving the vehicles, so they didn't run the cars off the road."
Listen, dirthead, people know people are very into their pets. You talk about killing people over your dog instead of using civilized ways of holding people accountable, so you know this to be true.
With that in mind, people are not going to squeeze past dogs on a road because:
a) people want to be 100% sure they're not going to hurt the animal whose owner apparently doesn't care enough to secure the animals when traffic is oncoming
b) people have to wonder how inching past a dog will be perceived by a possible psychopath dog owner that doesn't care to protect its animals properly
Imagine: someone is walking down a road with dogs. The cars stop and because the cars stop the dogs then run up to the car (not my dog she doesn't care about cars). Then the cars instead of staying on the road and driving slowly try to go around them by going into a snow filled ditch.
Yes it's happened twice but that's out of hundreds of car encounters.
This is rich.
Lmao at "My dogs weren't driving the vehicles, so they didn't run the cars off the road."Listen, dirthead, people know people are very into their pets. You talk about killing people over your dog instead of using civilized ways of holding people accountable, so you know this to be true. With that in mind, people are not going to squeeze past dogs on a road because:a) people wan
The roads are for more than just cars here. Both the cars and the dogs have to learn to coexist.
It's 100% true
Why do you think it is that almost every other car has no problem navigating the dogs?
Do you think they just got lucky or could it be possible that the drivers who drove into the ditch are idiots?
Why are cars "navigating" dogs in the first place
Also, there are ran over squirrels and rabbits in my neighborhood regularly and the speed limit is 25 mph and the roads are probably straighter
It's called sharing the road.
Once again it's a 25 mph speed limit in this neighborhood.
Perhaps you don't realize how slow 25 mph actually is.
