President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
Big epstein file dump today and trump is all over it.
Did hillary and obama also support deportations because they wanted to keep punching down on browns? Were they also deplorable.
Of course Obama and Hillary are not deplorable because they don’t stomp all over civil liberties when enforcing the law you irretrievably stupid **********.
Trump and his *******s are harassing people just because they’re not white, which we both know you ****ing LOVE. ****. You. ShitBag.
There are enough things to bash trump on. No need to highlight the things he is maybe the best president ever at - I am talking specifically at your mention of corruption and education. The mere fact he has talked about cutting the size of gov't (let alone actually attempt to cut it) puts him in the upper echelon of presidents when it comes to reducing corruption. Trump support
plenty of presidents have merely talked about reducing the size of government, so even by your own standards he’s not a particularly notable president.
Of course Obama and Hillary are not deplorable because they don’t stomp all over civil liberties when enforcing the law you irretrievably stupid **********.
Trump and his *******s are harassing people just because they’re not white, which we both know you ****ing LOVE. ****. You. ShitBag.
Yeah all those folks Obama deported had trials and were white CDN's . Looks like your the stupid fxcx
Yeah all those folks Obama deported had trials and were white CDN's . Looks like your the stupid fxcx
You’re missing the important point, ******. It’s ok to apply the law. It’s not ok to trample the Constitution when doing so.
During stupid **** Trump’s ICE surge, there have been many, many instances of ICE BREAKING THE LAW AND IGNORING COURT ORDERS. So much so that a judge had to write, “The court’s patience is at its end.” when referring to ICE’s non-compliance.
Feel free to provide evidence of ICE stomping on the civilian liberties of American citizens during Obama’s term and when you cannot, promptly go **** yourself. You’re a ****ing moron.
MAGAnuts suddenly pro government intrusion itt, which is hardly a Conservative value. Lol also at their claims that you don't bring a gun to a protest, which apparently didn't apply to Kyle Rittenhouse.
Yeah all those folks Obama deported had trials and were white CDN's . Looks like your the stupid fxcx
Classic. 😀
MAGAnuts suddenly pro government intrusion itt, which is hardly a Conservative value. Lol also at their claims that you don't bring a gun to a protest, which apparently didn't apply to Kyle Rittenhouse.
Classic. 😀
I think the point is if you bring a gun anywhere, bad things might happen, rightly or wrongly.
I think the point is if you bring a gun anywhere, bad things might happen, rightly or wrongly.
Within the context of America's gun laws, Pretti did nothing illegal being armed. That's it. He was disarmed anyway and then shot after being disarmed, which you seem to be disregarding, as well as disregarding the distinct lack of condemnation of Rittenhouse. It's utter hypocrisy by Maganuts.
You’re missing the important point, ******. It’s ok to apply the law. It’s not ok to trample the Constitution when doing so.During stupid **** Trump’s ICE surge, there have been many, many instances of ICE BREAKING THE LAW AND IGNORING COURT ORDERS. So much so that a judge had to write, “The court’s patience is at its end.” when refe
Trump and his administration are criminals. In this country, you do what the court says or you go to jail.
“ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.” -Chief Federal Judge Patrick Schiltz.
It’s impossible to read the above piece and conclude anything other than Trump and his thugs are ****ing monsters.
Within the context of America's gun laws, Pretti did nothing illegal being armed. That's it. He was disarmed anyway and then shot after being disarmed, which you seem to be disregarding, as well as disregarding the distinct lack of condemnation of Rittenhouse. It's utter hypocrisy by Maganuts.
You are disregarding my post. You're right that he did nothing illegal being armed. Do you think he's shot there if he wasn't armed? If yes, well then ok. If no, refer back to my post
"if you bring a gun anywhere, bad things might happen, rightly or wrongly."
Hmm. THe NRA has informed me that conceal carrying a Desert Eagle not only will keep me safe from violence, but will help keep the rest of society safe as well. I obviously want to do my part.
Are you telling me that I have been misinformed?
Hmm. THe NRA has informed me that conceal carrying a Desert Eagle not only will keep me safe from violence, but will help keep the rest of society safe as well. I obviously want to do my part.
Are you telling me that I have been misinformed?
I believe they said carrying a gun would keep you safe from government tyranny.
The anti-gun people in the past have said you don't need to carry a gun because the police have them and can protect you.
I guess everyone was wrong.
I believe they said carrying a gun would keep you safe from government tyranny.
The anti-gun people in the past have said you don't need to carry a gun because the police have them and can protect you.
I guess everyone was wrong.
I don’t think “Don’t worry the cops have guns” has ever been a part of the anti-gun argument.
In fact I think a bit selling point of anti-gun is that if no one else has a gun then your normal work a day cops don’t need them either and everyone dies less.
I don’t think “Don’t worry the cops have guns” has ever been a part of the anti-gun argument.
In fact I think a bit selling point of anti-gun is that if no one else has a gun then your normal work a day cops don’t need them either and everyone dies less.
It absolutely was. There are also people who have advocated the no guns approach, similar to the UK.
Within the context of America's gun laws, Pretti did nothing illegal being armed. That's it. He was disarmed anyway and then shot after being disarmed, which you seem to be disregarding, as well as disregarding the distinct lack of condemnation of Rittenhouse. It's utter hypocrisy by Maganuts.
I’m not sure why rittenhouse is coming up. They both went to a protest with a gun but that is where the similarities stop. I’m sure a **** load of people have done that in the last 10 years so connecting them because they checked those two boxes is as silly as some connecting me and you because we both of an “e” in our username and we both like pizza.
Their differences are alarming. Pretti spit at officers, threatened officers, damaged their vehicle and ignored their orders on at least 2 occasions. Rit did none of those. Rit was defending himself from a mob of rioters. Pretti was on the offensive.
your boy shat his pants today.
The quickest may to find out if there is any actual proof of trump doing anything wrong is to open any of the left leaning news outlets and if you see the words “we finally got the bastard” that means trump is in trouble. If the lead article title is anything other than that then they struck out again.
The media and dems have worked their tails off for over 10 years trying to convince everyone trump is evil and connecting or making up so many scandals. It is sad they can’t get any of them to stick. Their best shot was making up the Russian agent thing right before the election. Their worst attempt was promoting the hell out of that one nut who claimed she was raped 40 years by trump and just didn’t have the courage to tell until the moment 40 years later when it could possibly change an election.


