Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
I would like P&S mods to follow AIM’s excellent example and contain Mongo here for his conduct and posting in SE.
Would you be able to give us some examples of my conduct in the SE thread that you feel deserves this?
I find providing proof and examples is a very difficult thing for the haters of Mongidig. They just like to hate.
Why are the purest amongst us the ones to get persecuted?
Mongidig doesn't curse
Mongidig doesn't threaten people
Mongidig isn't an alcoholic.
Would you be able to give us some examples of my conduct in the SE thread that you feel deserves this?
I find providing proof and examples is a very difficult thing for the haters of Mongidig. They just like to hate.
If I did this, you would not be able to complain in SE about your containment here.
Besides your recent Only-Fans-pimp-turned-paint-fume-rapist-racist posts, can’t we just point to your entire body of work here as justification for your containment?
If I did this, you would not be able to complain in SE about your containment here.
Besides your recent Only-Fans-pimp-turned-paint-fume-rapist-racist posts, can’t we just point to your entire body of work here as justification for your containment?
Keep up the threats.
Screen shot.
Libel is frowned upon.
It's laughable to suggest that Marx would have recognized the modern version of the Chinese government as Marxist.
Oh, I don't know.
'Ce qu'il y a de certain, c'est que moi, je ne suis pas marxiste.' -- Karl Marx
Marx absolutely bloody hated Marxists, because they were turning a critique into a dogma, and paradoxically he appreciated the liberal bourgeois pluralism of England, his chosen home. (Of course he mistakenly thought England's openness would lead to The Revolution, and that The Revolution definitely wouldn't happen in repressive Russia, which was not the least of his errors. England's liberal reforms headed off The Revolution and Marxism became merely a template for murderous despots.)
There were attempts at revolution in Russia well before the first world war, an unforeseeable catalyst that without which it's very unlikely revolution would have happened.
I know you have read the marxism hypothesis but its incredibly simpleThere is basically no Marxist movement in the USThe modern right wing Marxist crisis is entirely fabricated from a literal Nazi trying to recreate the BolsheviksThe only people who talk about Marxism are deeply right wing, deeply propagandized, deeply disturbed/******ed peopleIts undefeated in its predictive c
Calls someone an idiot
Claims taking a class that discusses Marxism is a proof that Marxism is a prevalent system today
Marxism doesn't exist today in any material capacity. What ******ed right wingers call marxist isn't marxist. You should know this considering you took a class
This whole spin is mental gymnastics or acting out some sort of learning disability.
There's no true marxists!!!
It's an ideological position. It has roots, strains, core beliefs, perspective and patterns. Like scoring above 80 on an iq test, people recognize patterns.
1/5 professors in the humanities self identify as a marxist. 99.9% are leftists. What happened in Venezuela 25 years ago and how did that work out? Why do people keep doing this? Who just got elected in New York? On what platform and ideological slant?
People noticing the complete take over of left wing politics centered on identity groups with an oppressor vs oppressed narrative is just blatantly obvious pattern recognition.
To call the people being propagandized or extremist over this observation is idiotic. It's a worldview completely different than individualism and personal responsibility. It's a theme that divides a significant portion of all argument on 2p2 politics
The left has and continues to be hyper focused on racial grievance since Obamas presidency. What do you think DEI is?
This is the first result I got from gemini. The graphs don't lie
https://davidrozado.substack.com/p/menti...
You might want to re-think who's Being propagandized on this topic. I suspect you're just parroting a defense mechanism from those screeching hysterically at anyone noticing they're ridiculous ideologues
My Marxism theory is fully my own. I’d legitimately be shocked if other left wingers were peddling the theory.
“Marxists” are people who think capitalism will naturally move towards socialism as social inequalities rise.
That’s all Marxism is, a prediction of the future.
To call people who want hybrid forms of socialism “Marxist” shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what Marxism actually is.
And screeching about Zohran being Marxist just shows how captured and ignorant you actually are.
It’s always the same **** from these white suoremacists
“We should model our society more like homogeneous white countries like Switzerland or Denmark”
“Their system is democratic socialism”
“****ing commie Marxists”
It’s too stupid to bare
Yeah your world view is ******ed. That’s what we’ve been telling you. Glad you can finally admit it
My Marxism theory is fully my own. I’d legitimately be shocked if other left wingers were peddling the theory.“Marxists” are people who think capitalism will naturally move towards socialism as social inequalities rise.That’s all Marxism is, a prediction of the future.To call people who want hybrid forms of socialism “Marxist” shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what Marxis
Marxism plays out better in theory when needs and wants are fairly static. Like they were in Marx's day and for most of recorded history up to that point. People back then just couldn't conceive of our ever increasing consumption.
Look at how capital consumes itself through innovation in producing food. Not that long ago 80% of workers were producing food and related. Now its less than 5%. It's at that point were the marginal utility of capital falls off a cliff: that's the time Marx thought revolution would be a possibility.
With are ever increasing wants especially Healthcare, we'll probably never exceed the need for capital. He didn't think that was even likely in England for 100 years and maybe never possible inbackwards Russia.
Marxism plays out better in theory when needs and wants are fairly static. Like they were in Marx's day and for most of recorded history up to that point. People back then just couldn't conceive of our ever increasing consumption.Look at how capital consumes itself through innovation in producing food. Not that long ago 80% of workers were producing food and related. Now its le
You can write all that but all Coordi is going to think is "wow that guy has opinions on Marixsm he must be a Nazi".