Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
For those who somehow need it, are you sure it's not "hear, hear", you dumbass?
I still don't get it. Are you sure it was either straightforward or a joke? Before you respond, I'll remind you that jokes are supposed to be funny, that's part of the definition of that word.
so your obsession with spelling didn't make any difference. wierd that.
I recommend you read the reggie perrin books. Comedy classics. Probably even has 'correct' grammer & spelling for you
D2 has never and will never pass up the opportunity to point out someone's misuse of a honophone.
D2 has never and will never pass up the opportunity to point out someone's misuse of a honophone.
You'reeeee a hono.
D2 has never and will never pass up the opportunity to point out someone's misuse of a honophone.
wasn't it the correct use of a honophone?
Remember in Queen's Gambit when Beth Harmon shot that dude in the dick?
“This is not how reality works. You don’t get to be assured.
Anyone who actually does what I said would never doubt me, though.”
Is this contradictory?
Grok:
Spoiler
No, the two statements are not contradictory.
Let's break them down:
1. "This is not how reality works. You don’t get to be assured."
→ This asserts that, in reality, people are not entitled to certainty or reassurance. Doubt is inherent or unavoidable.
2. "Anyone who actually does what I said would never doubt me, though."
→ This claims that if someone follows the speaker's specific instructions or course of action, that person would end up with no doubt about the speaker's correctness.
These can coexist without logical contradiction because the second sentence describes a specific exception or pathway within reality: performing the recommended action supposedly leads to empirical conviction (i.e., personal experience eliminates doubt), even though the first sentence says reality does not hand out assurances freely or automatically.
In other words:
- General rule: Reality doesn't guarantee or provide assurance to people.
- Specific claim: But in this one case, if you do exactly what I prescribe, you will gain certainty through direct experience.
This is a common rhetorical structure (e.g., "You can't just be told— you have to see for yourself"). It is not self-contradictory; it is assertive and conditional. Whether the overall claim is true or persuasive is a separate question, but logically, the two sentences do not negate each other.
Derangement syndrome or willful dishonesty?
Is craig1120 the son of man?
There is no credible public information or established religious doctrine identifying an individual named craig1120 as the "Son of Man."
In established contexts, the title "Son of Man" refers to the following:
Biblical Significance: In the Christian New Testament, "Son of Man" is the primary title Jesus Christ used to refer to himself. It emphasizes both his humanity and his role as the divine figure prophesied in the Old Testament.
Humanity: In a general Semitic context, the phrase is an idiom for "human being". It is used frequently in the Book of Ezekiel to address the prophet Ezekiel, highlighting his human frailty compared to God's majesty.
Online/Social Contexts: "craig1120" appears to be a username. While individuals in online communities (such as on Reddit, YouTube, or social media) may occasionally use grand titles or be referred to by them in specific subcultures, there is no widely recognized religious or historical record supporting this claim.
To help you find what you're looking for, I can search for "craig1120" across specific platforms (like Reddit or YouTube) to see if this is a known reference within a particular online community. Should I look into a specific site for you?
Yes, look on 2+2 forums
On the Two Plus Two (2+2) poker forums, there is no record of a user named "craig1120" being identified as the "Son of Man."
While the forums have a dedicated Religion, God, and Theology subforum where the title "Son of Man" is frequently discussed in a biblical and philosophical context, search results for that specific username do not yield a profile or a known persona within that community.
Key findings regarding "craig1120" and 2+2:
Username Absence: "craig1120" does not appear as a prominent poster or a recurring figure in 2+2’s theological debates.
Likely Identity: The username "Craig1120" is historically associated with an Electronics Technician on the site JustAnswer, where he has provided technical support for home theater and security systems for over 15 years.
Forum Context: On 2+2, the "Son of Man" is typically discussed as a messianic title used by Jesus, with debates focusing on its meaning in Jewish tradition versus its use in the Gospels.
If you are thinking of a different user or a specific thread, I can search for variations of that name or look for specific high-stakes players who might have been given such a nickname ironically. Would you like me to check for similar names like "Craig" or "Stefan11222" on the forums?
Damn, son (of man), the omniscient AI does not know thee.
I just personally feel blessed that we are the benefactors of the ultimate wisdom of the one rather than society at large
Tell me about the poster craig1120 on the 2+2 forums
On the Two Plus Two (2+2) poker forums, craig1120 is primarily known for a negative reputation involving failed staking agreements and financial disputes in the Transaction Feedback & Disputes subforum.
Key details regarding this poster include:
Staking Discrepancies: In 2014, a staking group reported that craig1120 dropped out of contact after roughly a month of play and failed to submit required audits.
Outstanding Debt: Although he returned approximately $1,215 of the bankroll, he reportedly disappeared while still owing roughly $1,785 in "makeup" (money lost while being staked that must be repaid before the player takes a share of profits).
Communication Issues: The poster was flagged for providing vague details about personal problems before cutting off contact via email and Skype.
Forum Reputation: He is frequently cited in the "NEGATIVE Feedback Thread" as a player who should be avoided for staking or financial transactions.
Are you looking for more details on the specific staking group he was involved with, or do you need assistance navigating the 2+2 marketplace safely?
Maybe we shouldn't just blindly trust and copy-paste AI answers, huh, craig?
Tell me about the poster craig1120 on the 2+2 forums
Maybe we shouldn't just blindly trust and copy-paste AI answers, huh, craig?
Please. It’s not very difficult to figure out which prompts AIs are likely and unlikely to hallucinate on.
You disagree with the AI when it said I wasn’t contradicting myself?
Please. It’s not very difficult to figure out which prompts AIs are likely and unlikely to hallucinate on.
Oh really? Tell us how, o messianic one.
Has this ever been put to the test? Do you have followers who do what you say?
As the SoM, will you be judging me when I die?
My position is prostrate before you, o messianic one.
Has this ever been put to the test? Do you have followers who do what you say?
As the SoM, will you be judging me when I die?
I am the follower who all of what I say about spiritual development was tested on.
The SoM of your soul will judge you when you want to be reincarnated in this world. If you refuse the judgment of the light, then you will remain in the darkness of non-existence until you “repent”.
This is my understanding.
