The murder of Charlie Kirk

If someone murdered AOC at a speaking event I'd be horrified

If I see a video of a child rapist attacking Rittenhouse and getting lit up like a Christmas tree, I give Kyle a nod for the street justice

Floyd being an actual POS while resisting areest (not some ideological differences or the fact he did porn) makes me not even be close to the horror I'd feel seeing AOC hypothetically assassinated

This can't be controversial. Well I guess I'm wrong on that point apparently

Sure. So are riots for the purpose of racial justice. And those two questions have nothing to do with whether Rittenhouse acted in self-defense.

It's like 9/10 stupid. I've said it many times

10/10 stupid is attacking him

11/10 stupid is seeing him do the world a favor by lighting up the cild rapist attacking him and then deciding to be outraged because left vs right

in a normal decent country Rittenhouse would have stayed home because the full power of the state fueled by taxpayers would have been used to kill each and every one of the monsters that rioted and attempted to assassinate Rittenhouse.

that's the basic lesson of that story. that you fail as a country if those riots aren't answered with infinite state violence to kill every participant so those enemies of the state never try it again.

I know violent subversive people like thinman or rain man in this forum want those riots to exist regularly.

but decent people don't. and the state should quell them in the blood of the traitors that think they fan use violence to get their way in politics, which is basically the worst thing you can do as a citizen in the country

You’re not tracking. People don’t care what Floyd’s decade+ old criminal history was. They see Floyd as a stand in for themselves, and there’s no evidence that Chauvin knew what Floyd’s history was.

Again, why aren’t you dealing with the hypothetical I gave? If KR had killed in self-defense two absolute saints that cured cancer and volunteered at soup kitchens, it would still be self-defense. The character of the person that was killed has no relation to the legality of it.

Murderers kill each other in jail and we still prosecute them for murder as an example.

He should've never been in the situation to begin with. We have people in the thread arguing that some clowns making tik toks is going to increase political violence. Dumb teenagers learning they can insert themselves into volatile situations they have no biz being anywhere near looking to find the right little scenario to kill randoms and then get away with it/be made into heroes sends a message too. Let's call it 12/10 stupid 😀

Why are you being racist? Haven't we learn anything from the right all the hate. Yet you able to make fun of a minority for bad English. Sorry my school sucks I never learn how to read or write

Edit: fyi you meant to say "so you can start..."

It's not complicated. I feel more sympathy for decent people killed while behaving decently, even if I hate their politics

If feel less or no sympathy for people who are a lifelolong POS correctly being arrested again and resisting, all the way to demonic people being killed while attacking people

If you cant follow that logic you're pretty much broken

I definitely don’t think infinite violence is the right phrase to use here, but they definitely should have stopped way sooner. I participated in a few BLM events that were completely peaceful with no violence whatsoever, but I stopped once I realized it was being hijacked by marxists and anarchists for their accelerationist ideology.

Ironically I do think that the anti-police rhetoric in this country was partially fueled by libertarians. So the worst excesses of BLM was partially fomented by this culture of viewing cops as the enemies, which to any well-adjusted person they obviously aren’t. There definitely were, however, racist cops that mistreated black people.

I think that sort of fight is exactly what they were hoping for, so they can create a Russian Civil War style conflict. Communists always try to empower the state to crack down so they can frame those violent acts as oppression and “heighten the contradictions”.

I think you actually can’t read, or you’re dodging. If Kyle Rittenhouse killed a saint in exactly the same circumstances, would it not be self-defense just because he killed a saint?

You're correct, I did make a one-character typo. The SwiftKey on my phone isn't always perfect, and I've been playing live poker while making many posts today.

I have no idea what race you are. And I wouldn't normally have criticized your poor English if you hadn't been using it to tell deliberate lies about me.

BTW, I'm still waiting for the quotes of those things you accused me of saying. I would also accept a retraction and apology.

You seem not to be following the logic that none of these people's history was known when they were summarily executed.

I read part. "Is ridiculous to say that Jackson didn't have the brain power for anything, and to assume someone who graduated from Harvard magna cum laude only got in because of AA" What do you mean by this. Fyi I am coming to Bellagio again to grind some lhe next wsop. Feel free to ask for an apology.

Kirk made the comment about the lack of brain power in black women while discussing 4 particular women. One of them was Supreme Court Justice Jackson, who graduated with honors from Harvard undergraduate and law schools.

He also said something about them admitting they only got where they were because of Affirmative Action (the DEI type preferences formerly given for some school admissions and hiring).

I don't think justice Jackson actually said this happened, but I don't know for certain that she didn't. He more likely was referring to the fact that Biden promised to nominate a black female SC member. That was a stupid thing for him to say, IMO, but she was clearly qualified.

1. People were upset, especially black men, because it could have happened to them, even if they had no criminal record. But I think the rioting and destruction were still wrong, and I have never defended those actions.

2. Unless I missed it, no one said those two things were in any way similar. I certainly didn't. Your compatriots here were the ones making the connection, not mine.

Summarily executed? Rittenhouse acted in self-defense and was acquitted in court despite being infinitely well-poisoned by the far left and their allies in the media releasing trash hit-pieces on him. He should not have been there, but having been there he did everything in his power not to kill the people he killed and acted with tremendous restraint all things considered.

He absolutely did not act in self-defense. He entered the area brandishing a weapon, which caused others in the crowd to act in self-defense. No idea how you could think he acted with restraint, when he went there looking for someone to kill.

Summary execution was a bit of a stretch for emphasis though.

https://x.com/thatsKAIZEN/status/1967652...

"brandishing" a weapon is legal in Wisconsin so if some dumb mother****ers read it as provocation, that's their problem.

Wisconsin is real america, a full open carry state.

btw you are in your rights even if you go there to "look for someone to kill" as long as you only shoot when you are legally permitted to (like when communists subhumans attack you).

if you hate American laws and state differences and Wisconsin specific rules, that's your problem

Rittenhouse is a hero and if everyone was like him everyone else would be so far better offwe don't even have charts to graph that.

being in that riot was proof enough they deserved death btw. every participant deserve death, the only thing you can blame Rittenhouse for , is not having killed more people

Rittenhouse is a hero. And if someone killed Rittenhouse that night in Kenosha while he was opening fire, that person would be a hero as well apparently.

What do you mean by “brandishing a weapon”. If you just mean having a weapon out, that’s legal in wisconsin. If you mean he pointed the weapon at someone unprovoked in an unlawful way, that just didn’t happen.

As for why he was there, he made off the cuff comments that made him look bad in the media, but he also had private conversations about why he was there, which came out in court, and it was about protecting a local business.

What happens is that when the police can’t do their job for whatever reason and people feel like their community is under attack, they’re going to come together in defense of their community. That’s why we can’t have riots in the streets and buildings being looted and burned down. It happened in the 90s with rooftop Koreans and it will happen again if another prolonged riot breaks out with little political will to stop it.

He might be referring to open carry or he might mean threatening someone with a gun unlawfully. I’m pretty sure in open carry states it’s still illegal to point your gun at people in a threatening manner without justification.

Sure, race is made up, but he still defined some people by race when it was convenient.

It is correct that race is made up. It was made up by people like Charlie Kirk so they could use it as an excuse to enslave others.