The murder of Charlie Kirk
Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?
Apparently they j
Yes it has major companies have had hiring quotas based on race and gender. Some got rid of it. But it was certainly a thing during the heyday of BLM and woke nonsense.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray...
People who claim Kirk was racist are never going to be right. They never had any evidence ….they never will.
This is factually untrue. The Obama admin specifically steered away Whites from becoming air traffic controllers, ostensibly because there were too many White men in that position. But anytime you have racial or gender preferences for a position like that you are playing a dangerous game with many human lives.
Kimmel and Colbert were annoying and whiney liberals. This nation has shifted away from that. They wore their welcome out. this was a business decision knowing their target demographic no longer supported the snowflake culture.
Ummm.... No, it was not. The head of the FCC threatened the head of abc. At least admit you love the fascist takeover.
when those people will publish online videos of comedy with no executive action against them, will the psychotic crazies whining currently admit there is no violation of the 1a, or will they disregard the fact that those people are actually allowed to speak?
Ok, no more ever taking your opinions seriously. This shows you are an enemy of free speech. I hope school shooters come to Italy, and particularly to your neighborhood.
You already told us that wouldn't change your mind about anything, so I'm sure it wouldn't bother you.
I know Dem politicians are still saying it, but what % of left leaners actually still believe our democracy is at risk?
I guess what I am asking is if it is okay to treat people that think "democracy is at risk" similar to people who still think the earth is flat.
It's growing every day. Definitely a majority. Even most MAGA think so, but they like it. You're probably one of them.
most of them do but they define democracy as "a system of government where all core leftist values are always part of policy" so they are actually right?Basically for them it's not about the constitution at all and it never was, it's only democracy if they win and govern and if when the fake opposition wins it can't change anything of substance.I mean
Who exactly has done that?
I know you won't answer, because you made it up.
Ok, no more ever taking your opinions seriously. This shows you are an enemy of free speech. I hope school shooters come to Italy, and particularly to your neighborhood.
You already told us that wouldn't change your mind about anything, so I'm sure it wouldn't bother you.
free speech means the gvmnt can't come and take you or fine you or whatever for what you say.
it never meant free platforming.
in your country broadcasting has to be "in the public interest", and the gvmnt decides what it means. that's not like sending goons to your home because you wrote stuff they dislike (like in the UK and in Russia) ok?
when Tucker Carlson got kicked in the ass by fox that wasn't a violation of the 1a. same with these 2 tv shows that lost money for their companies.
it's just normal capitalism nothing to do with the 1a
free speech means the gvmnt can't come and take you or fine you or whatever for what you say. it never meant free platforming.in your country broadcasting has to be "in the public interest", and the gvmnt decides what it means. that's not like sending goons to your home because you wrote stuff they dislike (like in the UK and in Russia) ok?
When elected officials like AOC call for his removal yes it is . When Jimmy Kimmel does its not
https://x.com/KaliFontanilla/status/1969...Anyone want to take up refuting her argument?
Sure. She's a black woman, with no capacity to think. She just told us she partied instead of studying in college.
Plus, just look at her. She probably only made it through college by seducing and blackmailing her professors. She probably ****ed herself into a job too. We all know that's all black women are good for, right?
They are doing the good guy bad guy cop thing. They want the room mate to think he/she is in the clear so he/she lets their guard down. Maybe he/she will leak information talking to Roberts on the jail phone. If they were truly as close as it sounds like they were the room mate had prior knowledge this was gonna happen. The text exchange is a classic make it appear the room mat
Seems to me more likely that the father knew about it. Probably didn't realize Kirk's politics until later, and that's why he turned on his son.
Kimmel and Colbert were annoying and whiney liberals. This nation has shifted away from that. They wore their welcome out. this was a business decision knowing their target demographic no longer supported the snowflake culture.
You obviously haven't watched the shows.
Also there is no one in the country who is a whinier snowflake than Trump. You must be able to see that, right? Do you ever actually listen to him talk?
When elected officials like AOC call for his removal yes it is . When Jimmy Kimmel does its not
no it isn't. you need the gvmnt acting illegally to censor you or to punish you for speech to be a violation of the 1a.
members of gvmnt can express their preferences and that's ironically is their first amendment right as well.
to be clear the existence of illegal aliens is an actual threat to actual democracy.
given how the American constitution works the presence of aliens changes how house seats are allocated after each census. and that's an actual impact to actual details of American democracy.
so it should be a first order priority to remove every single illegal alien using unlimited state power to achieve that for every one who actually cared about democracy
Yes it has major companies have had hiring quotas based on race and gender. Some got rid of it. But it was certainly a thing during the heyday of BLM and woke nonsense.https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray...People who claim Kirk was racist are
So you didn't read what he said about black women?
no it isn't. you need the gvmnt acting illegally to censor you or to punish you for speech to be a violation of the 1a.
members of gvmnt can express their preferences and that's ironically is their first amendment right as well.
Have you heard of read what Trump and the head of the FCC said? They were clear threats of punishment.
I KNOW you're not that stupid. You obviously just love the idea of getting back at the liberals in the US who you think have somehow wronged you.
Lol, you have evidence it was "fabricated"? I even gave the context it was while talking about Supreme Court Justice Jackson.
yes he was talking about her. the "black women" is fabricated.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact...
NEVER BELIEVE ANYTHING PEOPLE ON THE LEFT SAY
no it isn't. you need the gvmnt acting illegally to censor you or to punish you for speech to be a violation of the 1a.
members of gvmnt can express their preferences and that's ironically is their first amendment right as well.
Do you consider what the FCC chair did or say as violation of free speech ? I do
did he threaten legal action or illegal action?
if what he threaten to do was something the FCC can legally do, then it cannot be a violation of any law or constitutional amendment UNLESS you think the FCC powers are unconstitutional to begin with.
question is can the gvmnt pull licenses for content which violates public decency norms yes or not? if it can then he can try that every time it thinks the content is ban able and then courts decide and it's never a violation of the 1a to attempt that.
lozen do you realize the FCC can ban you for porn which would be legal in other communication media right? and that should make it clear to you content rules for broadcasting are already curtailed vs actual speech on a medium you actually own
