The murder of Charlie Kirk
Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?
Apparently they j
"
"her unionization, Medicare for all, taxing the uber rich, renewable energy"
LOL, socialism or Marxism, and identity politics is all she stands for. That's hardly an original idea.
First off, unionizing isn't Marxism at all and its more within the realm of capitalism than socialism.
Secondly, a capitalist country that can offer socialized healthcare, like Japan or Canada is a bonus, partly as a result from capitalism.
Third, taxing the rich is a feature in a capitalistic society.
Fourthly, clean energy is policy, an investment choice, that was heavily derived through capitalistic innovation.
Fifthly ... we are heading into a world where AI will be replacing a lot of the workers who will need to be supported through UBI or some similar for of govt assistance - which is a good thing because we designed that **** that can do the work for us so people don't have to kills themselves and die early to put food on the table.
I'm obviously far to the right of you, quite a bit down the dirt road and even past a titty bar or two but AOC clearly has some good stances; her unionization, Medicare for all, taxing the uber rich, renewable energy, just off the top of my head which is all better than the status quo imo.If you magically became supreme ruler of America, what would you do that would be better f
AOC has actually worked against all those items except possibly renewable energy. There is a pretty well established pattern of Democrats running on popular issues then doing nothing or low key opposing those issues once elected. Obama and AOC fit but there are a lot of others. AOC refused to force a vote on Medicare for all when she had the power to do so. She voted to disallow the rail workers strike, God forbid they get an extra sick day. She has refused to back actions at Amazon (when the effort could have really used her - her showing up to talk after a victory after ignoring the workers when they were trying to make it happen is deplorable). She refuses to endorse socialist and Leftist candidates.
Her and Obama are so unbelievably slimy I don't know how their clothes aren't slipping off all the time.
What would I do? I bring these corporations to heel. I would reclaim all their so called intellectual property which was developed using tax payer dollars and only provisionally allow them to use it if they agreed to certain labor conditions including strict regulation on the moving jobs overseas. I would jail every politician associated in any way with the genocide in Gaza and ship them to the Hague or perhaps try them here for treason. And I would look at every war going back to Iraq and scoop up everybody who lied us into war and try them for treason after which they might be executed. I would scoop up every person who directed cheating in elections in Florida in 2000 and in Ohio in 2004 and I would see if I could get them executed under any statute. You have to have accountability and justice or you have nothing. We have to stop certain people from stealing the country's money, first and foremost. Then we can see what we can do with that money, our money.
wow someone here sound like what that word...hm.. Fascist?
I think the voting line on this is still leaning heavily MAGA on MAGA crime. I spent some time trying to understand groyper's more (sigh, some sic fks), and what are some of their most popular memes and themes, (like the bela ciao), and it's like 100% in the target zone. They also think anyone who is to the left of them is a fascist. Seems a much harder line to think w/ his whole background and these inscriptions, he was suddenly turned the opposite of everything in his past, and he wouldn't use different messaging to demonstrate that considering his whole point in doing this, and a lot of shooters like this, is to grab attention for their cause. So what's his cause kids?
I wonder how obscure the truth is going to get, because from the jump, the FBI and the administration has been misleading the public on the info they do have.
Perfectly normal reaction is to say/do things that you might not have said had you not seen your partner shot and bleed out in front of you.
so long as its white people I guess. all the Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, Somalis, Venezuelans, Koreans, Vietnamese, Panamanians, Russians that the USA has slaughtered are not allowed to call for justice lest they be labeled terrorists and then Obama hope and change is allowed to murder their children.
so long as its white people I guess. all the Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, Somalis, Venezuelans, Koreans, Vietnamese, Panamanians, Russians that the USA has slaughtered are not allowed to call for justice lest they be labeled terrorists and then Obama hope and change is allowed to murder their children.
I think the voting line on this is still leaning heavily MAGA on MAGA crime. I spent some time trying to understand groyper's more (sigh, some sic fks), and what are some of their most popular memes and themes, (like the bela ciao), and it's like 100% in the target zone. They also think anyone who is to the left of them is a fascist. Seems a much harder line to think w/ his who
yeah, most likely. hasan had a good breakdown on the minnesota shooter a couple weeks back, the terrorgram stuff is different from this groyper vein (i think?), but you can see similarities in the memeing, trolling, misinfo/disinfo, etc. there have been a bunch of these over the last few years, and clearly it is our future.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXaCVgxA...
I wonder how obscure the truth is going to get, because from the jump, the FBI and the administration has been misleading the public on the info they do have.
yeah unfortunately there are a lot of ppl who don't understand this stuff and a lot of others who are more than willing to intentionally weaponize false narratives for political reasons. we are so cooked. with this kirk case, it seems 1000% they're going to blame this on transantifa, even though he's probably just a groyper.
He was banging his boy soon to be girlfriend and was angered by what Kirk had to say. He probably thought he was doing the right thing and might have thought she/he would support him and be happy about it. He obviously wasn't thinking clearly.
None of what you said here is evidence that the murder itself was trans related.
Do you have a lot of examples of this happening? I can’t recall Jackie Kennedy doing that.
so long as its white people I guess. all the Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, Somalis, Venezuelans, Koreans, Vietnamese, Panamanians, Russians that the USA has slaughtered are not allowed to call for justice lest they be labeled terrorists and then Obama hope and change is allowed to murder their children.
Russians aren't white?
Amazin'!
Do you have a lot of examples of this happening? I can’t recall Jackie Kennedy doing that.
Her handlers wouldn't have allowed her to in those days.
As the widowed First Lady, she would have been required to "keep a stiff upper-lip."
And given that her husband JFK was cheating on her, she may have had mixed feelings about his death.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...
We’ll see if they are able to produce these but the FBI is claiming they recovered texts from Robinson.
'I will say what was found in terms of information, a text message exchange, where the suspect specifically stated he had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and he was gonna do that,' Patel told Fox News.
Patel added that when Robinson was questioned why he would kill the conservative influencer, he responded: 'Some hatred cannot be negotiated with.'
It’s nothing close to what’s going on here, but ok.
I suspect the Civil War has already started.
The murder of Charlie Kirk is Fort Sumter.
The answer to Bondie attempting to criminalize hate speech
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech.
And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment.
Keep America free.
