The murder of Charlie Kirk
Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?
Apparently they j
What Charlie Kirk actually said.
It's not just the quotes it's the implications and insinuations. He is really saying gay people should be stoned to death. That was his belief which is tried to artfully convey to people who look to him in forming their opinions on topics.
That's why I don't give a damn that he got killed. He was a bad person advancing ideologies that harmed people in order to protect his tribal advantages. To me, and I've studied many different opinions on the definition, that is the essence of fascism.
At the same time, his killing is nothing to celebrate because it doesn't change a damn thing. There are plenty of Charlie Kirks out there and the Kock brother have infinite money to try them out and promote the ones who catch on with people.
I don't know if this has been posted yet but in the end, Charlie Kirk leaned left.
It's not just the quotes it's the implications and insinuations. He is really saying gay people should be stoned to death. That was his belief which is tried to artfully convey to people who look to him in forming their opinions on topics.That's why I don't give a damn that he got killed. He was a bad person advancing ideologies that harmed people in order to protect his tribal
You fully support islamists who have much stronger views than Kirk and much more strongly fit your definition of fascism.
So clearly this is all bad faith in your part. You just want to see civilization destroyed, and you would gladly ally with any fascist or person who has thinks all gays should be stoned who you view as a fellow traveler in your pursuit of death and destruction.
What Charlie Kirk actually said.
I'm pretty sure people are going to click this link and go, "hurrrr durrr, see?!" instead of going to the linked source of each one of those snippets and putting them into context.
Most frequently mentioned here being the "Charlie Kirk says gay people should be stoned" when in reality, he's just responding to someone quoting scripture to him as an attack against him for not following it, and he threw it back at them as a, "Well, if you keep reading, it also says... just sayin'."
There's an entire r/maliciouscompliance subreddit devoted to why living your life strictly by the book is often detrimental.
Good on you for quoting the sources, though, and proving what an incredibly dishonest attack these were.
Too little, too late.
Imagine being a fully grown adult and finding this amusing.
The corporate media is slowly catching on. As I said earlier, these are known 4chan memes.
One was inscribed with, “Hey fascist, catch!” along with a series of arrows: ⬆️➡️⬇️⬇️⬇️
While Gov. Cox said the phrase “speaks for itself,” there’s a bit more to it than that. Gamers quickly linked the arrows to the button sequence in a game called “Helldivers 2,” that airdrops a bomb. In the game, players 0role-play as fighting on behalf of a fascist state ― not against it.
What Charlie Kirk actually said.
Wow, its is absolutely SHOCKING that most (all??) of these quotes happened after he started his podcast
Wild stuff. Never could have seen that coming. Who could have predicted this? I guess we will never know
I'm pretty sure people are going to click this link and go, "hurrrr durrr, see?!" instead of going to the linked source of each one of those snippets and putting them into context.Most frequently mentioned here being the "Charlie Kirk says gay people should be stoned" when in reality, he's just responding to someone quoting scripture to him as an attack against him for not foll
The specific stoning of gays was already discussed on here. We watched the whole video... He was very clearly contorting the word love, from the passage in the Bible, love thy neighbor as thyself, to mean that calling out acts of sin (being gay is a sin to him) is loving your neighbor. And then went on to say the Bible says that if you lay with another man you should be stoned.
He is was not literally saying, stone gay people. I don't think most people think this. It's clear though he was saying we should call out being gay as wrong... Because you know, the Bible says so.
Looks like the assassin recently turned into a full blown left wing extremist, and all those pictures where he looks normal are very old. And it is being reported the assassin had a very strong personal animus against Kirk. So Kirk was assassinated for his general right wing views, and all the Israel talk is irrelevant nonsense distraction. And more in more it is becoming a
Its more likely he was a Groyper than a short turn around convert to violent leftist extremist but thats just my elite intuition speaking
The specific stoning of gays was already discussed on here. We watched the whole video... He was very clearly contorting the word love, from the passage in the Bible, love thy neighbor as thyself, to mean that calling out acts of sin (being gay is a sin to him) is loving your neighbor. And then went on to say the Bible says that if you lay with another man you should be stoned.
Unrelated but did you hear that DOJ is blocking access to its own research that extremist violence is largely perpetrated by right wingers?
Classic
I'm pretty sure people are going to click this link and go, "hurrrr durrr, see?!" instead of going to the linked source of each one of those snippets and putting them into context.Most frequently mentioned here being the "Charlie Kirk says gay people should be stoned" when in reality, he's just responding to someone quoting scripture to him as an attack against him for not foll
Deep levels of irrational cope going on here. Its okay to admit you were duped. Even I've done it here on occasion
The specific stoning of gays was already discussed on here. We watched the whole video... He was very clearly contorting the word love, from the passage in the Bible, love thy neighbor as thyself, to mean that calling out acts of sin (being gay is a sin to him) is loving your neighbor. And then went on to say the Bible says that if you lay with another man you should be stoned.
I mean, in general yeah, but you have to understand that with media literacy at an all time low and his followers generally being unintelligent, combined with the other weirdos on his show and the implications of their beliefs and followings, that there are people who took his comments very literally
The specific stoning of gays was already discussed on here. We watched the whole video... He was very clearly contorting the word love, from the passage in the Bible, love thy neighbor as thyself, to mean that calling out acts of sin (being gay is a sin to him) is loving your neighbor. And then went on to say the Bible says that if you lay with another man you should be stoned.
I want to make this point clear. Kirk represents radicalized Christians views. That is, people who use their holy text, to justify their intolerance and bigotry of others. The video I'm referencing is a dispute between a non radicalized Christian, who is saying that Jesus said the most important commandment is to love God, and love thy neighbor as thyself. Which for her interpretation meant, love all people, including gay people. Her exact words were, we welcome everyone.
Kirk on the other hand, used the exact same passage and warped it to confirm his bigotry.
This is how radicalization works. No matter the religion. I hope and pray you can see the difference.
No, I clicked through to the actual sources, and they simply aren't as controversial as they're being made out to be. He says in multiple instances that he doesn't agree with that lifestyle but respects and welcomes them to his movement all the same. You can agree with 90% of what someone says and not come to blows over the last 10%.
The posts here and in the other threads in the last two days have led me to the realization that a video of my own neck being exploded in front of my wife and children might get the same general level of excitement from a bunch of people on the forum, and that's pretty ****ed up.
Not sure I want to participate in that.
My brother in christ this guy you are revering used the death of George Floyd to elevate his fame by framing it as Floyd deserved to be murdered
Him and his followers reveled in his death. A father of five
You cannot be this dense
edit: in before Floyd was a bad father or overdosed or whatever
Its more likely he was a Groyper than a short turn around convert to violent leftist extremist but thats just my elite intuition speaking
I am on phone now, but there are recent pictures of him floating around that do not support this theory at all.
The ones the media are showing are all 4 years old.
Neither does the reports he identified as an anti-fascist. Also, why in the world would a groyper assasinate Charlie Kirk?
Blatant antisemitism is practically the only thing groupers and Kirk strong disagree on.
The whole grouper thing seems like misdirection. And I am saying this as someone who does not support groupers or Fuentes at all.
after jan6 , lockdowns and vax mandates, those 2 elections, with trump almost assassinated being the candidate? it is.Leftwing people could have many reasons not to vote (especially very leftist people) but rightwing people? lol if you believe just 20% of the rightwing narrative it was the last chance to save the country from leftist genocide and infinite immigration to substit
He's probably from the nick fuentes contingent--seems to track with the other stuff as well. There were some rightwingers who had already gotten over trump after the first term.
I mean, in general yeah, but you have to understand that with media literacy at an all time low and his followers generally being unintelligent, combined with the other weirdos on his show and the implications of their beliefs and followings, that there are people who took his comments very literally
I'm not doubting that, but you're allowing them to shift the goal posts. The bigger point isn't whether some people didn't go beyond click bait headlines. The primary point is that Kirk was actively promoting intolerance of gay people.
No, I clicked through to the actual sources, and they simply aren't as controversial as they're being made out to be. He says in multiple instances that he doesn't agree with that lifestyle but respects and welcomes them to his movement all the same. You can agree with 90% of what someone says and not come to blows over the last 10%.The posts here and in the other threads in
Sorry, but you're wrong and you're being blinded by your own intolerance, which you've exhibited here yourself many times
He doesn't mince words in that video. He believes gay people live in sin, and they should be called out. It's very clearly stated by him in many places, including that video that he responds to that woman which was posted in here.
I don't agree with what he said about George Floyd. I was mad when George Floyd die. But you need to listen to the whole interview. He believe the death was due to overdose and the knee on neck is approve by training. Blacks use that death to riot and loots through out America. But yea I am sure the looting is the correct course of action. In the mean time people gathering around churches and praying for CK is irrational because there is no god.
