In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
Another example like , from today.
The politicized, radical leftist APA recommends the covid vaccine to babies under 24 month of age.
Leftist media only note in the title that federal guidelines are different
Ofc that allows the trollson and the cordies to think "it's trump that politicized that, actual experts believe it's proper to vaccinate under 2y old babies with the covid vaccine!"
Except Germany and Canada experts don't recommend that!
But again it has been like this for the whole of covid, rabid leftists taking the opinions of the most radical leftist experts and inventing a consensus that never existed (on mask mandates, on lockdowns, on vaccination mandates and so on) to claim science backed their policy requests.
They lied every time, and they lie now with trans issues.
The left is the anti-science party, nothing destroys trust in science as much as inventing a consensus that DOES NOT EXIST that magically always agre with the worst people on the left takes on everything and claiming that's science.
No, the actual experts meaning professional, apolitical orgs like the AMA and the APA instead of Fox News and Boomer Facebook memes where you guys get your info from. Sorry, there aren't credible right-wing anti-trans bigots who are subject matter experts just like there aren't many actual scientists who are creationists or climate change denialists and there aren't many pro-ID
AMA and the APA are as political as you can get! They lobby for new laws and regulations all the time.
(As an aside, I'm considering putting 'dumb retrograde bigot' on my next new business card.)
If AMA and APA are apolitical, the NRA is as well. It's grotesque, indecent to claim that the AMA and the APA are apolitical.They are exceptionally political, and to the radical left (that is , dramatically to the left of the median voter of the democratic party).This is a political, non scientifical statement predicated on *radical leftist* claims and language for example Jus
Trolly's claim that the AMA and APA are 'apolitical' gots to be one of the biggest howlers in the history of this forum.
"We don't trust the usual subject matter experts because they disagree with Donald Trump and RFK Jr." kinda gives the game away, guys.
"We don't trust the usual subject matter experts because they disagree with Donald Trump and RFK Jr." kinda gives the game away, guys.
In all fairness, you pretending AMA and APA are apolitical equally gives the game away.
Truth is, you can't find any non-biased experts on this subject cause they don't exist. It's all political.
Truth is, you can't find any non-biased experts on this subject cause they don't exist. It's all political.
Sure man, whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better about being on the wrong side of progress.
MAGA loyalty test.
any teacher coming from the blue states will be required
to pass an assessment exam administered by PragerU
Oklahoma classrooms will be safeguarded from the
radical leftist ideology fostered in places like California and New York
textbook definition of indoctrination, a loyalty test for teachers
MAGA loyalty test will be yet another turnoff for
teachers in a state already struggling with a huge shortage
Sure man, whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better about being on the wrong side of progress.
We could listen to current and ex female athletes who have admitted men would absolutely destroy them but then we’d be using common sense and that’s not something people like you like to do.
MAGA loyalty test.any teacher coming from the blue states will be required to pass an assessment exam administered by PragerUOklahoma classrooms will be safeguarded from the radical leftist ideology fostered in places like California and New Yorktextbook definition of indoctrination, a loyalty test for teachersMAGA loyalty test will be yet another turnoff for teachers in a stat
“Small government” mfs doing somersaults to justify each new day.
Sorry, but all female athletes are partisan and political so I can ignore whatever they say.
Sorry, but all female athletes are partisan and political so I can ignore whatever they say.
Not uncommon for people like you to deny the existence of women. Isn't that step 1 in the transgender ideology?
Cute little cheerleader we have here.
Not uncommon for people like you to deny the existence of women. Isn't that step 1 in the transgender ideology?
Cute little cheerleader we have here.
Denying the existence of women would be the first step in the opposite direction, actually.
Also if your stance is to trust the experts why haven’t we halted trans surgeries and some trans affirming medical treatments like the experts have done in countries more liberal than the USA like England and others in Europe
Why because of the money involved that the medical industry sees
Hmm no one wants to answer this question
If only there were "right wing" scientists then I guess useful science would actually happen
But since all scientists are lefties the world is ****, or something
You guys are legitimately ******ed. Like, all of you. Its a sight to behold
Also if your stance is to trust the experts why haven’t we halted trans surgeries and some trans affirming medical treatments like the experts have done in countries more liberal than the USA like England and others in Europe
Why because of the money involved that the medical industry sees
What do you mean by halted trans surgeries? The only surgeries in the US are on adults and .000001% of kids with specific exceptional cases
If only there were "right wing" scientists then I guess useful science would actually happen
But since all scientists are lefties the world is ****, or something
You guys are legitimately ******ed. Like, all of you. Its a sight to behold
Lol i tell you that canada and germany experts make opposite determinations than american "experts" , because yours are far more radical and politically compromised, and this is your answer?
Try to address the fact that countries with better heaòthcare outcomes and lower costs have experts that fully disagree with yours on major topics, for once. Including "trans health"
Lol i tell you that canada and germany experts make opposite determinations than american "experts" , because yours are far more radical and politically compromised, and this is your answer?
Try to address the fact that countries with better heaòthcare outcomes and lower costs have experts that fully disagree with yours on major topics, for once. Including "trans health"
Maybe you can explain how you think Germany disagree with "me" because I'm looking at the guidelines from 2024 and it seems like you have no clue what "me" stance is
If only there were "right wing" scientists then I guess useful science would actually happen
But since all scientists are lefties the world is ****, or something
You guys are legitimately ******ed. Like, all of you. Its a sight to behold
In order to be a *mainstream* Republican in 2025 you actually have to believe that entire branches of modern medicine and biology are all part of a leftist partisan conspiracy, even completely non-controversial stuff like vaccination. It's really astonishing.
Not uncommon for people like you to deny the existence of women. Isn't that step 1 in the transgender ideology?
Sorry, but women are partisan ideologues (just look at the gender gap in voting!), can't listen to them either.
Lol i tell you that canada and germany experts make opposite determinations than american "experts" , because yours are far more radical and politically compromised, and this is your answer?
Try to address the fact that countries with better heaòthcare outcomes and lower costs have experts that fully disagree with yours on major topics, for once. Including "trans health"
Im not to sure about Canada they have jumped on the Trans Ideology just like the Americans . I do believe its Sweden, France and England that have pulled back on it
Trolly's claim that the AMA and APA are 'apolitical' gots to be one of the biggest howlers in the history of this forum.
Everything is political uf you’re a political hack. Right wingers will tell you political bias is why every single branch of science rejects the notion that the earth is only 10k years old.
Maybe you can explain how you think Germany disagree with "me" because I'm looking at the guidelines from 2024 and it seems like you have no clue what "me" stance is
they disagree with the experts you claim are "uncounterfeitable" on the latest thing i posted about current covid vaccination guidelines for babies.
As for "trans health", check the UK, Denmark, Japan, Finland and so on for minors.
You are in favor of american "experts" because they agree with you puberty blockers and hormones should be given to sexually confused minors. Many other countries experts simply disagree.
Yet you claim there is a consensus among experts on those topics, and the consensus is what you think is good and proper.
Im not to sure about Canada they have jumped on the Trans Ideology just like the Americans . I do believe its Sweden, France and England that have pulled back on it
canada and germany as per my post are about covid vaccination for the under 2y old.
For trans issues it's other countries that differ from the USA.
Any example of actual experts disagreeing is fundamentally important, because it proves the fake consensus cordie claims exist, doesn't actually exist at all on MANY topics.
These people are insisting experts agree on trans issues. That's blatantly false when you take into account foreign experts, from countries who are far better at healthcare
the experts cease to be trustable the moment they make any political choice. The instant they take a stand on a political issue they forever lose all credibility as "experts" and it's demented to think otherwise.Unless coordie wants to believe that the "experts" defending trump tariffs after having pledged political allegiance to him are to be trusted.It works both ways: if yo
If you are a forensic anthropologist, you might classify people as being of a particular race, or you might want to classify them based off of the predicted features based off clusters of traits. The choice you make there may seem “political” to some or not “political” to others.
So I disagree that taking a stance on a controversial political topic makes you not an expert. Indeed, if experts only took uncontroversial stances then they would cease to have much use in their expertise.
Actually it seems like upon reflection one of the key components of expertise is taking a stance on controversial topics. But you do have to hedge and be transparent about controversy.
