President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
I'm told that if ICE or other law enforcement comes to your home and knocks on your door, if they don't have a warrant, they can only enter your home if they "get a foot in the door";
That doesn't meet any legal threshold. They need your consent to enter. Foot in door does not equal consent.
That being said, they probably don't care about legal thresholds, and you're likely better off just not answering the door.
Sometimes you guys all bleed together
But you certainly opposed masks and have spoken snarkily about masks in the past
"Practical voters", lol. Impractical voters' votes still count. I don't remember when you first mentioned this qualifier, I don't think it was initially, but it doesn't much matter as I am responding to the very common cliche "a vote for [any non-Dem nominee] or a non-vote is a vote for Trump". Nobody else I've ever seen adds any goddamn qualifier to that statement, they jus
I thought I explained the diff between realists and idealists, but you're still derping. Cool, brah.
Apparently, according to fake news, it's been leaked by the IC that it wasn't successful and only set Iran back just a few months. I guess more bombs shall be incoming and we'll see if Trump can keep his mouth shut and not give them a heads-up again.
Yeah, I didn't say Bunker Busters didn't exist, I said they didn't exist like today.
Bombing Iran was the first public use of the BGU-57 which as about 10x more effective at penetrating depths as the previous generation
I just wanted to point out how much USA loves to kill women and children
I thought I explained the diff between realists and idealists, but you're still derping. Cool, brah.
This is the full response to me taking apart your moronic bullshit?
"A VOTE FOR JILL STEIN IS A VOTE FOR TRUMP ... but only if you are a qualified partisan Democrat! Please feel free to ignore this dumb cliche if you are one of the ~85% of all eligible voters that do not qualify as a strict Dem voter..."
This version of the cliche, unique to Land O Lakes and Land O Lakes only, is a lot less catchy than the real cliche.
While I would agree with the implication that Cheney is even more evil and greedy than Trump... there's no confirmed evidence anywhere that Iran's nuclear capabilities have been destroyed or even critically harmed in a way that matters. And I've looked.
I get that low-info, boomer-meme posters like yourself are happy to take Donald Trump's word for it...
I'm told that if ICE or other law enforcement comes to your home and knocks on your door, if they don't have a warrant, they can only enter your home if they "get a foot in the door"; they're much like vampires, so the best course is to refuse to open the door for them and call a lawyer.I mean, they may just break the door down and do whatever they feel, that's always in play,
Amazing!
oh, I also like the part where LOL said he is "not a Democrat".
My man, you are one of the most Democratic Democrats to ever Democrat. Bog standard, center, neocon-adjacent Democrat. I'm sorry if you're another of those who don't understand their own politics.
This is the full response to me taking apart your moronic bullshit?"A VOTE FOR JILL STEIN IS A VOTE FOR TRUMP ... but only if you are a qualified partisan Democrat! Please feel free to ignore this dumb cliche if you are one of the ~85% of all eligible voters that do not qualify as a strict Dem voter..."This version of the cliche, unique to Land O Lakes and Land O Lakes only, i
Once again, I'm talking about realists, not idealists. No one who voted for Stein contemplated between voting for Harris or Stein; it was either voting for Stein or not voting at all.
Just pointing out you had an epiphany 2 years ago and now are white knighting every minute of your life.
You have no moral high ground here.
And if you ever mention Biden (which you voted for) was a continuation of Obama's policies (deporter in chief, warmonger or w/e else u say), you also must mention the fact that it suited you well till some arbitrary breaking point.
I blame acid or maybe a stroke, but you clearly are a complete joke.
oh, I also like the part where LOL said he is "not a Democrat".
My man, you are one of the most Democratic Democrats to ever Democrat. Bog standard, center, neocon-adjacent Democrat. I'm sorry if you're another of those who don't understand their own politics.
Well, I've never been a registered Democrat and have voted other tickets than Democrat. I think your difficulty is that you're tarding over the fact that just because I speak out against Trump that I must be a devout Democrat.
All throughout my life I have never “had” to carry ID, and the ones most opposed to it have always been the right-wing libertarians who used to hate the government. Now they happily fellate ICE agents because they love authoritarianism.
exactly.
true freedom....only for us not for all.
and only when we like it ...
it would be preferable if we didn't have to carry id for anything. unfortunately we live in a rule-based, kyc society.
who gives a $h!t what interpretation u want or is.
those that agree with it today because its trump doing it should just stfu and stop saying they are pro freedom, less government intervention, less regulation and promote themselves has libertarian ffs.
its becoming a police state...
the rest is meh.
Can we stop with the dumb memes in this thread. We already have a dedicated meme thread.
Just pointing out you had an epiphany 2 years ago and now are white knighting every minute of your life.You have no moral high ground here.And if you ever mention Biden (which you voted for) was a continuation of Obama's policies (deporter in chief, warmonger or w/e else u say), you also must mention the fact that it suited you well till some arbitrary breaking point.I blame a
no it wasnt an epiphany. it was relatively gradual. I still believed in harm reduction and that Trump was a unique evil in 2020.
but I am probably the only person on this forum that actually reads and changes his viewpoints based on acquired information.



