In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
I just looked and at least 7 of Trump cabinet graduated from Harvard. In fact, its the single school with the most graduates of all the colleges.
Really ****ing weird that Harvard is being singled out, but its just about a show of power and not any tangible philosophy
counterpoint: Wernher von Braun
Where does he get the idea that you have to "import a foreign class of servants?" Who the hell is claiming that?
Its stupid from top to bottom. I work at a company that does more space stuff than spacex and all of our space programs are US only.
We get about 10 H1Bs a year with a global staff over 150k
I just looked and at least 7 of Trump cabinet graduated from Harvard. In fact, its the single school with the most graduates of all the colleges.
Really ****ing weird that Harvard is being singled out, but its just about a show of power and not any tangible philosophy
uh? it is exactly because they know how Harvard was that they are outraged at what Harvard has become and at the people that ruined that crucial American institution.
the defiling leftists operated on Harvard was comically disastrous, and it is being singled out because it has the biggest endowment of all and the biggest (in power terms) alumni network and the most clout in the judiciary.
the fish rots from the head.
if even Harvard could fail and be raped by leftists so much, the probability it happened basically everywhere else as well if very high
uh? it is exactly because they know how Harvard was that they are outraged at what Harvard has become and at the people that ruined that crucial American institution.the defiling leftists operated on Harvard was comically disastrous, and it is being singled out because it has the biggest endowment of all and the biggest (in power terms) alumni network and the most clout in the
You are talking out your ass per the usual
And I'm tired of this increasing rhetoric. Shut the **** up with this leftist rape everything nonsense or im going to start banning you
You can be critical without talking like a ravenous foaming at the mouth nazi piece of ****
You are talking out your ass per the usual
And I'm tired of this increasing rhetoric. Shut the **** up with this leftist rape everything nonsense or im going to start banning you
You can be critical without talking like a ravenous foaming at the mouth nazi piece of ****
As far as I can tell, the only people 'ravenously foaming at the mouth' are Lefties like you.
You are just barely a notch or two below Karl_OG in that regard, imo.
You are talking out your ass per the usual
And I'm tired of this increasing rhetoric. Shut the **** up with this leftist rape everything nonsense or im going to start banning you
You can be critical without talking like a ravenous foaming at the mouth nazi piece of ****
Harvard used race as a criteria for hiring and admission. That's illegal, and that's predicated on leftist ideals of "equity". Positive discrimination is illegal no matter if you think it shouldn't be.
Harvard does that. It's not a nazi claim to claim harvard does that, and does that because leftist ideology requires that.
It is illegal to ever take race into consideration in hiring or in admissions. Fully illegal, uncontroversially illegal. No one should do that. Those that do that should be punished by the full extent of the law, and political power should be used to it's fullest extent to punish them as well.
Either that or you have to go on record claiming that provisions of the civil right act that pertain to private actors should all be removed and discrimination by private actors should be legal.
But even if the civil right act, for private actors, was repealed, then Harvard would only be allowed to discriminate if it didn't take one federal or state dollar.
So given Harvard takes public money (and students at Harvard get public subsidies which benefit Harvard to pay for tuition), Harvard wouldn't be allowed to ever take race into consideration even in a world where private freedom of association was allowed.
Harvard used race as a criteria for hiring and admission. That's illegal, and that's predicated on leftist ideals of "equity". Positive discrimination is illegal no matter if you think it shouldn't be.Harvard does that. It's not a nazi claim to claim harvard does that, and does that because leftist ideology requires that.It is illegal to ever take race into consideration in hir
I'm not going to fact check this whole post but the very first sentence is not even what Trump is claiming. I don't know where you are getting that from, but even if thats what the administration was accusing them of, that doesn't make it true.
But this doesn't surprise me that you support Trumps overreach. I have no clue why you feel so strongly that the US should have a dictator. Its like vicarious porn for you or something
I'm not going to fact check this whole post but the very first sentence is not even what Trump is claiming. I don't know where you are getting that from, but even if thats what the administration was accusing them of, that doesn't make it true.But this doesn't surprise me that you support Trumps overreach. I have no clue why you feel so strongly that the US should have a dict
from a SCOTUS decision?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_f...
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Harvard that, by a vote of 6–2, reversed the lower court ruling. In the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts held that affirmative action in college admissions is unconstitutional. Because of the absence of U.S. military academies in the cases, the lack of relevant lower court rulings, and the potentially distinct interests that the military academies may present, the Court, limited by Article III, did not decide the fate of race-based affirmative action in military academies.[13][14]
But this doesn't surprise me that you support Trumps overreach. I have no clue why you feel so strongly that the US should have a dictator. Its like vicarious porn for you or something
Which dictator, what are you talking about?
There is no Trump overreach in this matter. Political power has the right to use it's legal power to achieve it's aims ffs. Same as democrats can give more money to Harvard if they think it's a good use of their power when they govern, republicans can stop doing that.
The law allows the executive to determine who will take the federal grants from the health department (to the most part). What would be the overreach if specific institutions that the executive finds failing and behaving horribly, get less or no money?
The law allows the executive broad latitude in determining who , as alien, can get VISAs. What would be the overreach if Trump decides not to give VISAs to people who want to study or work at Harvard?
So SCOTUS determines Harvard (and a lot of other colleges) blatantly violated the constitution by racially discriminating against asians and whites for decades.
Cordie comes down from his tree claiming he has no clue why republicans are upset at those institutions and rightly hellbent on doing anything in their power to weaken or destroy them. And it is nazi rethoric to use strong metaphors to describe the horrors of decades of racial discrimination.
How so?
I don't recall calling anyone a Nazi. I also know for a fact I don't vomit profanity-filled invectives at other posters.
Calling Lucio a nazi and cursing has nothing to do with being a dumbass hypocrite
Most religious nutters are hypocrites. They are judgmental and discriminatory despite the teaching of god telling them that is a very bad thing to be.
And you don't hate nazis so you don't talk about them like that. You hate gays and trans people
So SCOTUS determines Harvard (and a lot of other colleges) blatantly violated the constitution by racially discriminating against asians and whites for decades.Cordie comes down from his tree claiming he has no clue why republicans are upset at those institutions and rightly hellbent on doing anything in their power to weaken or destroy them. And it is nazi rethoric to use stro
The supreme court ended affirmative action. That doesn't make everything that colleges did before affirmative action was ended illegal.
You cannot be this stupid
The supreme court ended affirmative action. That doesn't make everything that colleges did before affirmative action was ended illegal.
You cannot be this stupid
You should read better. That decision proved Harvard (and others) did violate the constitution for decades. That correctly triggers republicans into wanting to destroy those institutions.
Unless Harvard changes completly (which requires removing every single person who made those unconstitutional decisions to begin with from any decision making position forever), it deserves to burn, for republicans.
And that's why they are targeting it.
Calling Lucio a nazi and cursing has nothing to do with being a dumbass hypocrite
Most religious nutters are hypocrites. They are judgmental and discriminatory despite the teaching of god telling them that is a very bad thing to be.
And you don't hate nazis so you don't talk about them like that. You hate gays and trans people
You just can't stop lying, can you?
I don't 'hate gays and trans people.'
Why do you lie about me like that?
Please show one post of mine where I ever said or even implied that I hated 'gays and trans people.'
And we already talked about affirmative action. I know you thought that black people were getting preferential treatment and thats why you cared but investigations found out white people were getting preferential treatment and we all know you think white people should get preferntial treatment so why are you talking about decades of racial discrimination like we aren't currently in a white nationalist movement
How many times are these idiots going to call me a liar as they lie out their ****in faces
You should read better. That decision proved Harvard (and others) did violate the constitution for decades. That correctly triggers republicans into wanting to destroy those institutions.Unless Harvard changes completly (which requires removing every single person who made those unconstitutional decisions to begin with from any decision making position forever), it deserves to
They found Affirmative Action to be unconstitutional and repealed it. That doesn't retroactively make Harvard have some sort of criminal liability or culpability for following affirmative action
The rest of your post is nonsense
That's actually true (kinda).
The Moderators (at that time) defined homophobia broadly to include anyone who openly claims that homosexual behavior is a sin/immoral.
I do still believe that homosexual behavior is a sin.
But I in no way hate homosexuals.
Quite the contrary: I will pray for all sinners to repent of their sins and receive Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
All of us sin, including you, me and the Pope.
The world isn't divided between 'sinners' and 'non-sinners'; it's divided between forgiven sinners and unforgiven sinners.
Note well, I never even mentioned this subject until you brought it up.
I never had any intention of discussing this topic ever again in this Forum.
Hope that helps.