President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
I guess its good to know that white people getting preferential treatment in the US has somehow broken Lucio and Dunyains fragile brains
Who would have thought it was the one thing they thought they wanted that would send them over the precipice
Still a big favourite over the US with its drug addled population of entitled obesity unwilling to open its borders to productive workers because of white supremacy.
The median chinese person has an opinion of immigration in his country that is to the far right of Elon Musk. They don't even have the concept of the possibility that immigration of non-Hans could ever be beneficial in any sense for their country.
You know that, you know they basically have no immigration and never had, yet you think "white supremacy" is worse even if under white supremacy you could still actually have some immigration, unlike under the "han supremacy" china has.
Even allowing immigration of whites-only in the USA would still be A LOT BETTER than the no immigration at all China does. You know that. And yet... for some reason han supremacy, which is the ruling ideology in china, and super majoritarian, for you is less problematic for the country than white supremacy (which worked well for the USA and for Australia in particular) can ever be.
I guess its good to know that white people getting preferential treatment in the US has somehow broken Lucio and Dunyains fragile brains
Who would have thought it was the one thing they thought they wanted that would send them over the precipice
I want wealthy people to get preferential treatment. If dispossed black wealthy land owners (or latinos in venezuela and so on) ask for refugee status, i would like them as well to get in front of the line.
I don't know what you think broke down around here. The asylum mechanism has been raped by the left beyond recognition for decades at this point. We just have fun seeing it used to troll them once in a while.
I would like for the whole sham construct to be annihilated and rewritten completly. But i have to deal with reality not with my dreams.
I could give a **** that they are moving here. I don't really care. But the whole immigration masquerade becomes blatantly obvious now. Not that it already wasn't. But, geez.
the fact that your side has been pushing for a decade an outrageous lie about trans people being targeted for assassination and about a purported "trans genocide" happening.
So i am saying the narrative about afrikaneers being victimized and genocided isn't worse than that sham.
Pretty sure you just invented trans genocide while we were talking about south african "refugees"
About the 5th time in the last 100 posts a right winger brought up trans people literally as a nonsequitor
lol imagine going to bat for Afrikaners
Pretty sure you just invented trans genocide while we were talking about south african "refugees"
About the 5th time in the last 100 posts a right winger brought up trans people literally as a nonsequitor
You said the idea that there is a genocide of white south africans is a sham.
I just said it's a lesser sham that the idea there is a genocide of trans people in western countries, which is something your side has spread regularly, and which you never denied was a grotesque, fake narrative.
It is a very clear sequitur: you are accusing the right of doing what your side regularly does a lot more. So you can't use that as an argument against the right. Because your side does it more, more regularly, to the point the word genocide itself has no meaning other than "bad stuff happening to a group i like" anymore.
Your idea of unparalleled success is spending a dozen or more hours a day sitting in front of a screen typing white supremacist bullshite and ignoring your family (assuming they really exist). Everyone else thinks it makes you a total loser.
lol the stereotype of white conservatives is obviously unparalleled success!!! Certainly not trailer park Cletus who can’t do any math a normal junior high student can and that reads and speaks the only language he knows at a 6th grade level
[TWEET]1922237764788961358
[/TWEET]
Gotta be honest. Looking at the official ANC response, one begins to get worried this is actually much more than the political stunt it looks like.
Anytime communists start talking about equality, justice, and accountability for **** thst happened before any of us were born, everyone should be getting very nervous.
Despite the relatively close ties to China, I wouldn't describe the ANC as communist, and I don't think many other reasonable people would either. When you replace an explicitly abusive and racist government with a party that has a long history of opposition, but little or no history of controlling government, you often end up with dysfunction and corruption after the honeymoon phase ends.
That's more or less the situation in South Africa now. The ANC has major corruption problems.
I'm sure there is a strong legacy of racism among white South Africans that is taking decades to dissipate. Again, this is not surprising. You see the same thing in the American South. State sponsored racism doesn't just harm the oppressed group. It poisons the minds of the group in power for decades as well.
It’s not hard to go and work in China. wtf are you talking about. Even Rick managed it. There were plenty of western workers when I was last in Shanghai. A part of the city is even called the French Quarter for historic reasons and features European architecture, cafes etc.
'Permanent residence' permits in China are restricted to 10 years maximum, and the person must have 'invested' in some way.
Pretty sure you just invented trans genocide while we were talking about south african "refugees"
It is a thing (admittedly a made-up thing) whose existence has been claimed by activists.
It's not a bigger sham than the "trans genocide" sham narrative.But the socialist expropriation is real and is more than enough to take refugees in, especially if it's the expropriated people (so capitalist minded people, those you want in our countries, unlike the collectivist ones).A wealthy person can certainly be a refugee if he escapes socialism in any form, it's incredibl
I agree that refugees can be even upper class and can still be allowed in. The far left doesn't understand that someone being a successful farmer and businessperson is not a condemnation of them that they were chased out of a communist country. The sensible left does understand this of course, as those refugees oftentimes do become part of the democratic party. Hence why the party elite is far less likely to support communism and socialism than the body politic.
That doesn't mean that if someone is a poor farmer or has been chased out of their home due to oppression from gangs that we shouldn't take them in as political refugees. But that also doesn't mean that we should have infinite refugees being allowed in just because they claim to be fleeing oppression, and the Supreme Court has already determined that they only have a right to a hearing, they don't have a presumption of their claim being valid. If the claims were processed in a timely manner, a large chunk of them get rejected.
All people are asking is that we follow international law on these issues.
You said the idea that there is a genocide of white south africans is a sham.I just said it's a lesser sham that the idea there is a genocide of trans people in western countries, which is something your side has spread regularly, and which you never denied was a grotesque, fake narrative.It is a very clear sequitur: you are accusing the right of doing what your side regularly
Its not a mainstream narrative nor is it something anyone is taking seriously, except for you of course.
I searched the trans thread and it was only being brought up by right wingers and denied by lefties.
I hadn't even heard of it until today
Evolutionists literally believe that all people are animals. Highly-evolved pond scum.
Do you have some competing theory that you are offering against the idea that people are part of the kingdom animalia?
Do you have some kind of disagreement with the taxonomy proposed by biologists and paleontologists?
After all you seem to accept that "animal" is some kind of relevant biological category, but you are adding an extra part of the theory which carves out humans as being separate from this group that they strongly resemble with many different lines of corroborating evidence. So what's the symmetry breaker between humans and animals such that positing an extra part of the theory would add to the theoretical virtues of the theory? Because it seems as though even if we remove humans from the animal category, we still have those lines of corroborating evidence which connect all other animals together.
So it would seem you would have to either give up on the classification entirely and say something else is going on, in which case you would upend all number of taxonomy under the "eukaryota" domain, or you have to come up with some kind of symmetry breaker such that what would apply to humans would not apply to animals, and this will likely involve positing extra entities that the evolutionary theory does not have.
Well, we're not vegetables. Although some vegetables, like the more impressive trees, are pretty admirable.
This is already granting too much, actually. If he rejects evolution, then the category of "vegetables" should be similarly nonsensical to him, as the same process that gave rise to vegetables is what gave rise to animals.


