Super Bowl 58: #3 Kansas City Chiefs vs #1 San Francisco 49ers (-1)
I didn't even know he was on the Giants for the first 3 years of his career before one season in SF until I saw "3x Super Bowl champion" under his name and went to Wikipedia to find out where the non-Denver title came from.
But it looks like they wouldn't be the first one. According to Google, Steve and Zak DeOssie both won a title with the Giants.
I haven't seen anyone else running them in SE so I wanted to post this again. I'll be wrapping this up soon so if you haven't already gotten your squares but you're interested in some, stop being a nit and hop on over to OOT or just PM me. Here's what's left:
$10 #1 - SOLD OUT$25 #1 - SOLD OUT$50 - SOLD OUT$10 #2 - 24 left$25 #2 - 65 $250 - 50 / SOLD OUT?We've reached the halfway point on the $250s. I'm a bit stubborn and not ready to give up quite yet. I'm going to start a wait list for anyone who still wants to get in on the $250s. If I can get it up to at least 85-90 sold, I'll run it with the blank squares mentioned before.
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/34/ot...
Sorry for the spam
6-point laser!
But he was, and this is a goat offensive system and supporting skill position group that produced very similar Jimmy G discourse exactly four years ago (and we got our answer on that 3.75 years later!!).
I was looking for the first time I ever used Wompwompalo (which I just changed to Womp cuz I can’t be typing that all out every time and don’t know how to use scripts) cuz I know it was years ago and came across this from 2022
ok, I'm tired and I've got a lot of tequila and I doubt I can speak coherent English right now but **** it, time to let it ripJames Richard Wompwompaloholy mother****ing **** you are a worthless ******* who I want to Phil Leotardo with my rav4 hybrid. the only downside is the sweet sweet sound of your cantaloupe breaking will be muffled by the spaceship sound my car makes going
I don’t remember making this post but I stand by every word

Spoiler


Peerless hating, no notes
(The “womp” and Purdy situations may not end up being so different, is all I’m saying)
In the Green Bay game the 49ers had 17.5% win equity at one point according to ESPN. Vs the Lions it was as low as 8.5% equity. So my prediction is this: SF will beat KC but they will have less than 20% equity and somehow overcome that again becoming presumably the first champion in NFL history to win it all while having less than 20% equity at some point in every playoff game.
In the Green Bay game the 49ers had 17.5% win equity at one point according to ESPN. Vs the Lions it was as low as 8.5% equity. So my prediction is this: SF will beat KC but they will have less than 20% equity and somehow overcome that again becoming presumably the first champion in NFL history to win it all while having less than 20% equity at some point in every playoff ga
Basically the same as 4 years ago but reversed. Not sure how low Chiefs win equity was but it was looking grim
KC 27
SF 21
- - - - - - - - - -
coin toss: heads
player to score the first TD: Kelce
marriage proposal after the game: no
total number of Purdy turnovers: two (one INT and one lost fumble)
Marriage proposal: no seems like a solid bet
Call me a hopeless romantic but I actually believe the kelce swift thing is legit. Nothing would expose what a sham relationship this is more than a post Super Bowl proposal
Basically the same as 4 years ago but reversed. Not sure how low Chiefs win equity was but it was looking grim
Against Houston the win% was definitely below 10% at some point (they trailed 24-0). It was below 5% against the 49ers when they trailed by 10 in the 4th quarter before the 3rd&15.
But I doubt it went anywhere close to 20% against the Titans even when they trailed by 10 in the 2nd quarter. The model had them with a 75% win probability before the game.

One of them has a dad bod the other one looks like he's 13.
Against Houston the win% was definitely below 10% at some point (they trailed 24-0). It was below 5% against the 49ers when they trailed by 10 in the 4th quarter before the 3rd&15.
But I doubt it went anywhere close to 20% against the Titans even when they trailed by 10 in the 2nd quarter. The model had them with a 75% win probability before the game.
Below 5% 4 years ago was quite the comeback.
Basically the same as 4 years ago but reversed. Not sure how low Chiefs win equity was but it was looking grim
My guess without looking it up: KC had less than 10% equity in that SB.
Now I'll look it up: when SF was up 20-10 with 7:17 left in the game, Chiefs had 3.9% equity. My god it never felt that low.
Against Houston the win% was definitely below 10% at some point (they trailed 24-0). It was below 5% against the 49ers when they trailed by 10 in the 4th quarter before the 3rd&15.
But I doubt it went anywhere close to 20% against the Titans even when they trailed by 10 in the 2nd quarter. The model had them with a 75% win probability before the game.
My god I had forgotten how crazy that chiefs run was. Looks like the low point equity for KC vs Titans was 38.7%. Vs Houston 6.1%.
My guess without looking it up: KC had less than 10% equity in that SB.
Now I'll look it up: when SF was up 20-10 with 7:17 left in the game, Chiefs had 3.9% equity. My god it never felt that low.
The Chiefs were one play away from a 4th and 15 for basically the game. The 9ers could have camped out at the sticks and made it incredibly difficult.


I can't believe there's 3 more days of blibbety blab.
Every local and national football podcast I listen to has already said everything there is to say.
SF 27 - KC 24
