In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
Court filings reveal the man who attempted to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh now identifies as a transgender woman.
quoting to show that libtards ALWAYS ignore evidence in these threads. Show them stats that almost all the recent mass shootings were trans and *crickets*
They can't process reality.
Imagine being a mod in this forum and allowing this worthless Nazipig to post this stuff lmao.
But as these things go, I probably will be banned for good now.
But that gives me more time to celebrate the eradication of Charles N. F. Kirk. (The N. F .stands for Nazi Fucctard)
Respect to everyone who has the guts to eliminate Nazis.
quoting to show that libtards ALWAYS ignore evidence in these threads. Show them stats that almost all the recent mass shootings were trans and *crickets*
They can't process reality.
If you can find more than 10 total mass shootings (in the US) since 2013 that were committed by trans people I'd be utterly shocked. And that's using the loosest definition of mass shooting, of which there have been over 5500 in that time period. I realise you have no credibility about anything you post and are by your own admission just here to troll but claiming "almost all the recent mass shootings were trans" might be the single most inaccurate statement in the history of this forum and that's an absurdly high bar to clear. Following it up with the idea that people rejecting it can't process reality could almost be performance art if I didn't think you actually believed in the general sentiment of it.
Homan caught dead to rights in bribery scheme but the administration investigated itself and found itself of no wrongdoing
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-a...
If I were to pick anyone most likely to get caught in a bribery scheme it would be Homan or the bearded guy I can't remember his name right now
They just wanted an excuse to get rid of him, those late night shows are losing huge piles of cash
This is one of the dumber things being said on this topic. Since when have networks had any issue with canceling a show because it's losing money? They even cancel shows that make money because they think they can make more money with something else.
Anyone know why we're bailing out Argentina? While you're at it, can you explain how that happens?
Anyone know why we're bailing out Argentina? While you're at it, can you explain how that happens?
I thought Milei was gonna rock **** like we've never seen lol
Anyone know why we're bailing out Argentina? While you're at it, can you explain how that happens?
Trump wants to support Milei, obviously.
Argentinian peso had been doing well under him but the austerity measures he has pushed have hurt the poor. As a result his party hasn't fared well in recent elections and that was expected to continue-- therefore all of the recent gains the peso was making were being wiped out.
Anyone know why we're bailing out Argentina? While you're at it, can you explain how that happens?
the Fed creates a line of credit that allows Argentina to give collateral to it (evne low quality collateral) and get real moneuy (USDs).
The treasury also has a fund with limited capacity it can use to prop up the finances of foreign countries temporarily for some billions and it's using that.
They are doing it because they are political allies. That's what you do as a country: you punish your enemies and help your allies. Being rightwing in this world is being allied with the forces of good, with the decent people worldwide that are trying to live in a world with a lot of leftism.
So you punish brasil because it elected the marxist Lula and you reward Argentina because it has the pro capitalism, pro Israel Milei.
Trump wants to support Milei, obviously.
Argentinian peso had been doing well under him but the austerity measures he has pushed have hurt the poor. As a result his party hasn't fared well in recent elections and that was expected to continue-- therefore all of the recent gains the peso was making were being wiped out.
That's not it. It's the electoral win of communists in buenos aires that sent markets into a downward spyral. And they won because the majority of argentinians are ****ing communists especially in urban areas. They want to parasitize the real economy because that's how they lived for 50+ years. They are the victors and the jalfrezi except they are legion there, they are the actual majority of the population.
Milei didn't do worse than the previous election there. But he didn't gain enough to get a majority. And they voting again soon.
The Trump white house also requested content be taken down and his FBI had a direct line to facebook which was somehow blamed on democrats.
quoting to show that libtards ALWAYS ignore evidence in these threads. Show them stats that almost all the recent mass shootings were trans and *crickets*
They can't process reality.
When did you show these stats? I must have missed it, please repost.
The largest single owner of traditional media for the last several decades has been Rupert Murdoch. The idea that he is left-wing is laughable.
The largest single owner of traditional media for the last several decades has been Rupert Murdoch. The idea that he is left-wing is laughable.
he owned the single largest (in terms of viewers) broadcaster, but everyone else was leftist.
In the last 50+ years media was overwhelmingly leftist -owned. Now, victor would claim they were "liberal" and not radical leftists. Fair.
Still, going with something very normal for non leftists like "races exist, are real, and they have measurable differences in very important traits" was not an allowed topic on media.
If we get 50 years where we can discuss racial IQ genetical differences as normal topics for normal people having breakfast, while anyone saying a gender identity exists different than biological sex is treated like a ****ing monster and sent to the media gulag (censored and deplatformed forever), that would be 50 years to make even with what happened before ok?
all i ask is the 50 years liberal had of complete control of media landscape and topics.
What exactly do you think would be the benefit of discussing IQ differences between races?
the main topic would be education.
If we accept blacks and other minorities have worse educational outcomes on average (and so jobs and everything else correlated to that) because of genetic reasons we stop wasting money on them , redoing curricula to "accomodate" them, and removing high talent classes because "they are racists".
We start treating them as a group which has expectedly far worse outcomes without wasting anything more on that than what is needed to allow them to participate in civil society.
That would liberate resources both to lower taxation and to invest in the people who can actually achieve a lot.
Then everything else. Given the IQ-income thing correlates literally with every single life outcome, we stop wasting resources claiming it's racism if they have lower life expectancy, higher incarceration rates and so on. We start accepting that's due because of genetic differences. And we stop wasting valuable resources on them.
You do not invest more in the less fertile land you have, if anything you do the literal opposite. As a society, it is morally horrific to invest scarce resources on groups of people that have lower talent.
/
All of this would happen if we normalize the discourse as per above. "of course" liberals spent 50+ years destroying everyone who attempted to do that. Only to end up paying 200k more for houses where blacks arent' around, which liberals call "walkable neighborhoods" with "good schools" and "low crime" (which just means places with very few blacks around)
what's false in what i wrote? do you realize liberals self-select themselves to live in uber-white/asian areas regularly especially in urban areas? they do this all the times, it's their main sport
Anyway your reaction is proof of what i said. What i wrote is what all normal (=non leftist) people think. Everyone knows that. It should be the normal narrative in the media. But it wasn't because of gatekeeping for decades.
Now we can hope normality is restored for some decades.
At the very least we could figure out if there is anything to that, which we currently can’t figure out because it’s a truth we ought not talk about… Which is what got Harris in trouble when he wanted to hash that stuff out. He’s still smeared as a racist for not having a hugboxxy conversation about that issue.
now if we hold for 50 years having the right owning most major media companies we make even with the past 50 years.
I knew you were going to make some dumbass statement in the face of the overwhelming fact that right wingers have owned American media for all relevant history
I knew you were going to make some dumbass statement in the face of the overwhelming fact that right wingers have owned American media for all relevant history
you often claimed republicans are racists (which they are, according to your definition) yet you know for a fact racism was not allowed on normal media. How do you square that with media ownership by the right?
At the very least we could figure out if there is anything to that, which we currently can’t figure out because it’s a truth we ought not talk about… Which is what got Harris in trouble when he wanted to hash that stuff out. He’s still smeared as a racist for not having a hugboxxy conversation about that issue.
the data is clear and obvious and known by everyone who cares. It has just been buried for decades by dedicated gatekeeping, and you know that.
The conversation should be about "what do we do given we know X for a fact", not about X.
Neither IQ as a particularly good measure of innate human intellect or race (in terms of generic groupings like black/white) as a biological reality are supported by science. Not even the fundamental starting point of your argument is fact, let alone any of your conclusions based on it.
