The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition
Bad beats are part of the game. I understand that. But after absorbing more than my fair share on Poker Stars I switched
The riggies also have a 5-step program btw1. Suck at poker An independent site has confirmed i dont. Thank you for untruth number 12. Cry about sucking at poker Again, An independent site has confirmed this is an untruth3. Complain on a forum that they are cant win because of the rigged RNG. Often with theories that could very easily be proven.
I think you have just done a post that comes under, misunderstanding, condemning without truth just as your laminate from the poker sites says! Thank you for backing up this claim!
Who on earth would come up with a post like this thinking hes getting one over on me after i have posted the below!!!!???? Hes just done a post exactly to what i claim he does!!!
Lets have a look at the paid site defenders laminate may look like, that they will have to stick to at all times;
1 Any talk of the RNG not performing to odds, ALWAYS ask them to prove it. This is the number one priority, as its something they wont have the funds to do and this must be requested repeatedly.
2 Belittle and publicly condemn people writing about the RNG discrepancies. NB any condemning does not neccessarily have to be true, as long as its effective. This will discourage them from further posts and get those weaker ones sitting on the fence on your side. Remember, its easier to side with a bully and this is key to having the forum under control.
3 Deliberately misquote and misunderstand anything they use to support their case. This will deflect from the subject and engage in conversation away from the points being made.
4 Repeat steps 1-3 in reply to any new comment. Steps 2-3 may be used for those who are taking longer to 'go away'.
Your $50 will be paid monthly into your nominated bank account.
These guys bang on about 'proof' over and over and over and claim that anyone who does not hold their beliefs in the deck, is not credible and worthy of belittling and insults.
They have proof in the fact that the independent stats site Sharkscope, offers a spinning star for 'a top position on sites global leaderboards'. No personal claim, no personal opinion, just pure fact. Its there for anyone to see. I have one. I play under the same name. Its not easily achieved, as it takes a huge amount of games and associated profit to get this.
Do they accept this fact? No, absolutely all the aggressive supporters have individually continued to suggest the complete opposite, even since bringing this to their attention. Some have even, despite claiming to be the cream of online poker, not to have heard of Sharkscope. This would be like a pro footballer not having heard of Wembley.
Don Johnnie; 'you have no clue about hi lo' etc etc and much worse
Slugant; 'you suck at poker' 'you're a loser' etc etc etc and much much worse
This is clear proof that if you spent the huge amount of money and dedicated the huge effort (please, please dont suggest a tin pot tracker or auditor can do this, tho you will) to provide conclusive proof of what to most, is plainly obvious.... a squewed RNG.... they would immediately shoot it down. Immediately. Conclusive evidence, but dismissed without thought.
They have conclusively proved that presented with fact, they show themselves for what they are. Site reps, acting in the manner that you would expect, lying and cheating their way through life to line their own pockets.
We have conclusive proof contained within these posts of how you have acted once presented with this fact. This is who you are and what you represent. You specialise in lies and untruths. Would true fellow poker players continue to offer zero respect to someone and continue with proven lies, once having a checkable conclusive fact presented to them? Of course not.
If you cant not spot their true reason for being here after reading this, you is in serious denial! Its all here in writing.
Percy forgot to take his pills again.
Bob managed to post without the use of a play on '**tard'. Wow, well done!
If you want to explain to why you and your 'mates' (tho they cringe everytime u post, believe) ask for proof and then totally ignore proof, have a go in your own time. (im gonna pre empt Slugants reply of the laminate number 1 point and say im talking about that they ignore proof tht someone is a winning player, not that i have proof of a squewed RNG... .hes so so predictable that he would deliberately misunderstand what is being said, as per the laminate, i will answer this in advance)
Have a go, im intrigued to what you could come up with.....
Poker isnt about having a revolving star next to name on sharkscope. (especially on a site that went out of business years and years ago)
Poker isnt about passing a test on a staking site where you need to pay to take those tests.
Poker is about the results on the pokersite and actually doing well at the tables.
Where you never escaped microstakes and therefore you suck.
All your results have confirmed that 😉
I dont hide. Have you ever put 1 minute into actually finding this out? Because thats all it takes. You know there is a search button on this forum right? You know you click on persons name and see their posts & threads right???
1 minute and you can see a lot of hands posted by me including my screenname. You can even see me bashing coinpoker or ggpoker for which im supposed to be shilling. All your crackpot theories about me can be debunked if only you wanted to.
But you dont want to the 1 minute of research because that would mean you cant yell your nonsense at clouds anymore.
Oh yea of course, we shouldnt take you literal. So when you said you were actually not bad you were just being sarcastic. Gotcha!😉
1 Any talk of the RNG not performing to odds, ALWAYS ask them to prove it. This is the number one priority, as its something they wont have the funds to do and this must be requested repeatedly.
So weird huh that when somebody accuses somebody else they are asked to provide evidence. Why cant we be more like South Sudan?🙂
Also, you dont have the funds to buy a $50 tracker? Because thats all it takes
You can even do it in the 14 day trial period. It wont have to cost you a penny!
The way you describe the riggedness that certain players get help each time while others are duped. AVALANCHES OF 4 OUTERS remember? How is this impossible to show? And how is it expensive to show? If you can see it you can show, its that easy.
Now lets think. Why would someone who claims to have such damning evidence and clear pattern of riggedness not even attempt to show it?
Maybe because its never even there 🙂
They have proof in the fact that the independent stats site Sharkscope, offers a spinning star
Do they accept this fact?
Do you accept the fact that you never climbed out the microstakes and therefore are not good at poker?
NO all you have is a "spinning star" on a site that closed down ages ago😃
Who do you think is a better poker player? Player A who wins a couple of bucks a month on microstakes but has a silver star from 10+ years ago or Player B who crushes midstakes and makes 10k+a month but doesnt have a silver star?
If you think player A is better or close to player B that will tell you perfectly why you'll never be good at the game ever.
This is clear proof that if you spent the huge amount of money and dedicated the huge effort (please, please dont suggest a tin pot tracker or auditor can do this, tho you will) to provide conclusive proof of what to most, is plainly obvious.... a squewed RNG.
If its so plainly obvious you can show it so plainly easy 😉 Dont contradict yourself in the same sentence for gods sake :p
If even you can see the RNG has a pattern, imagine what mathmatical software can see and show us
And again, its not costly at all, in fact it can be done for free. You are making that up each time.
It wont take huge effort either, although any effort into research is already too huge for you
You dont know anything about a tracker and its capabilities because you never used one and refuse to learn anything about it.
Why do you keep saying it cant be done and its expensive even though to show what you describe is very easy and actually free to show?
Why do you dismiss trackers as a good option to show the numbers when you claimed you never used one and in fact refuse to learn anything about them?
Have a go, im intrigued what figments of imagination you could come up with 😉
Your reply fits in with your site rep laminate, that you must stick to at all times to get your $50
1 Any talk of the RNG not performing to odds, ALWAYS ask them to prove it. This is the number one priority, as its something they wont have the funds to do and this must be requested repeatedly.
2 Belittle and publicly condemn people writing about the RNG discrepancies. NB any condemning does not neccessarily have to be true, as long as its effective. This will discourage them from further posts and get those weaker ones sitting on the fence on your side. Remember, its easier to side with a bully and this is key to having the forum under control.
3 Deliberately misquote and misunderstand anything they use to support their case. This will deflect from the subject and engage in conversation away from the points being made.
4 Repeat steps 1-3 in reply to any new comment. Steps 2-3 may be used for those who are taking longer to 'go away'.
Your $50 will be paid monthly into your nominated bank account.
Did you seriously just bring up the poker tracker AGAIN, which of course we all know proves nothing, which is why this thread exists. It comes under laminate 1 of course which is the site main objective.... ask them to prove via something that wont prove it. Push this at all times for your $50 a month.
Then we have belittling with untruths. I was staked whilst on Full Tilt, i did NOT have to pay for any test, they just tracked my results turning $10 into $1000 over a month or so. This was the only criteria and was advertised in Poker Player magazine at the time. The editor even left to do this. Belittle, whist not neccassarily being true, its on the laminate.
Followed up by another lie, that i never escaped microstakes. Lets have a think about this statement can be true in any way. A staking site funding microstakes? Seriously? That would be about as much business sense as letting a poker site run without any tweaking of decks to ensure maximum profit. Makes no business sense whatsoever.
Then we go onto the statement that Sharkscope somehow 'stars' a micro stakes player making nothing but does NOT recognise a 'mid stakes player crushing the game making 10k a month that has no star'. Can anyone spot how this may be wrong!? Remind me of how i get a star but he doesnt and how that would work.......
Then i say in brackets 'please dont suggest a tin pot poker tracker.... but you will', (as we have totally exhausted this line).... what does he do??? yep... most of his post is asking me to get a poker tracker! See how i can totally predict his answers.
DO YOU NEED ANY MORE PROOF THAN THAT TO SEE HE SIMPLY CAN NOT POST WITHOUT STICKING TO THE 4 STEPS ABOVE. COS HE DOESNT GET PAID IF HE DRIFTS AWAY FROM IT!
Oh and i dont research you as i have no interest in a liar or someone who produces fake news to help out sites. But... it appears you have an unhealthy interest in researching me .... who you say is a loser and habitual liar.... now why would someone waste their time doing that, if thats what they really thought hmmmmmm!?
Bob managed to post without the use of a play on '**tard'. Wow, well done!If you want to explain to why you and your 'mates' (tho they cringe everytime u post, believe) ask for proof and then totally ignore proof, have a go in your own time. (im gonna pre empt Slugants reply of the laminate number 1 point and say im talking about that they ignore proof tht someone is a winning
Nobody cares about your crazy tantrums, Percy. Take your pills.
