I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
Trump Media to sell instant access to 'market-moving' social posts
the corruption is no longer shocking
the boldness still is
RococoThe reason it's more likely the USA imo is that every other country has to consider how the usa will respond
Some tactical use (maybe to take out a difficult target) is more likely than desperation
Someone asked me at work yesterday what I thought the chances were that Trump would green light a nuclear strike against Iran.
I said that I thought the chances were very slim but would go up considerably in the unlikely event that a group tied to Iran was able to execute an attack on American soil that killed thousands.
The question did make me wonder how people on 2+2 would react if Trump ordered a nuclear strike. My best guess is:
Within five minutes of detonation, Victor would be saying that liberals were mad that Trump ordered a nuclear strike before they had an opportunity to do so.
Ten minutes later, lozen would say that it was unfortunate Trump had ordered a nuclear strike but that Democrats should have nominated a better candidate than Kamala if they didn't want a nuclear weapon to be detonated.
Thirty minutes later, movin.target and the ghost of mongidig would be saying that the U.S. should be proud to have a president who was willing to do the necessary to achieve durable regime change.
And three days later, craig would pop in to say that the detonation of a nuclear weapon was irrelevant in the grand scheme because something something Son of Man....
