Playing detective at the poker table

Playing detective at the poker table

https://www.freezeoutpoker.com/p/playing...

There are plenty of nicknames out there for specific hand combinations in NLH. Some are obvious like “Ladies” for pocket Queens. Some are overused like “Jiggitys” for Jacks. At least one is named after a legendary player in T2 being the “Doyle Brunson”. Interstate 610 makes a loop around the city of Houston. This lends itself to a Southeast Texas regional nickname for T6 in “The Loop”.

Well a few months back, my friend Chris1 coined his own. He monikered the K6o the “Watson” while its suited cousin carries “Sherlock”. Why you may ask? It’s Elementary of Course!2


Gathering Information

While Mr. Holmes is on our minds, let’s get to the theme of today’s essay. Each time we sit at the poker table we should be actively picking up clues. Some tidbits are easy. Is the person to my right opening too many hands? Is the person in the Big Blind calling raises too much? These are questions that we are all asking ourselves subconsciously at most any level.

Some players are looking slightly deeper and looking at why a player would open to 3 big blinds on one hand and then to 2 big blinds on the next. Picking up these clues is the first step to exploitation and straying from our balanced game.

Acting on the Information

Once we have a sufficient amount evidence to make an exploitative play, we still should only make a relatively small detour from our equilibrium game. This is because - while we are confident in the clues we have gathered on this player - there are usually other players in our way or yet to act. We don’t want to get way out in the weeds with our ranges or sizing.

This is ultimately because every time we drift from equilibrium - or our best flawed attempt at GTO3 - we open ourselves up to be exploited.

Imagine that we find out through playing all day at a table that a player seems to overfold to over-bets but tends to overcall when facing 3/4 pot size bets on the river. We may think that we can exploit this by over-betting our bluffs and betting 3/4 pot with our value hands against this opponent as an exploit. However, if this is sniffed out by our opponent playing detective in her own right, you may get a lot of rivers checked to you and start to get hero called on your over-bets and folds to your 3/4 pot bets.

This is the next level of paying attention at the table. It’s paying attention to who is paying attention. This is important but also requires nuance. For example, I always advise beginners to at least act like they are paying attention to every hand even when they have no stake in it and may not even understand what they are looking for or at. On the other hand, some savvy players play the dolt but are actually noting all that happens with their “peripheral attention”. In summary, it can be difficult sometimes.

Offense vs. Defense

You can typically tell the seasoned player from an inexperienced one in a major tournament as the veteran will start conversations like “Where are you from?”, “Has anyone played this event before?”, “Are you planning on playing the X tournament this weekend?” These all seem like benign conversation starters from a friendly person and they kind of are. This player wants to get to know you. He wants you - believe it or not - to have fun, relax, and enjoy yourself. He also wants to know infomation he can use against you in game. If this player knows that you are from Nebraska, haven’t played this event before, and didn’t even know about tournament X this weekend, he will have enough information to reliably classify you as someone who doesn’t play at a regulated casino very often (as Nebraska’s selection is scant), may be taking a shot / not familiar with the structure since you haven’t played this event before, and not a regular as you aren’t familiar with the upcoming schedule.

This is why veteran players talk up the table. It’s also why inexperienced player should play “clue defense”. As information will disproportionatley favor the experienced player, equilibrium should look like some players trying to create an environment that is ripe for gathering clues and others protecting themselves by trying to give off as few as possible.

If you are an inexperienced player, you may be saying to yourself: “How do you expect me to gather clues while I’m spending most of my time trying to play ‘clue defense’?” The first answer is to look at who is asking the questions at the table. This is a great clue that this player is confident and is doing his part. Watch out for this player as he is likely to be better than average in skill level. You can also listen to the answers of the players who are responding to the questions being asked by said veteran. You can glean a ton of clues in this situation without opening yourself up.

All of this said, I have seen talkative players that were just blabbing about mush and inexperienced players that want to talk in an effort to get rid of nervous jitters. There are very few “Always” and “Nevers” in life or on the felt and the number of things to look or listen for are too many to list.

These are only some very rough beginning guidelines. It’s up to you and your detective work to separate the wheat from the chaff. One thing is for sure, you will not get better at sussing out reads and exploits unless you practice. That typically means putting the phone down, stop watching the game on the big screen and start paying attention to the action and voices around the oval.

You are welcome to leave the pipe and goofy hat at home. But you should absolutely be playing your best detective while at the tables.

If you enjoyed this essay, please consider liking it below. If you have any input or questions, please comment below or email me at [email protected]

As always, thank you for reading.

1
In the case that this nickname takes off, he can be credited by his full name Christopher Inman.

2
Just in case you are still scratching your head or are an international reader, American primary schools are typically Kindergarten (K) through 6th grade. Hence K-6.

3
GTO - Game Theory Optimal. Game Theory is the study of actions that take into acount the potential actions and reactions of other players. Game Theory is used in marketing, economics, warfare, and - yes - some games. This study is not specific to poker but the game of poker - especially when bet sizings are as vast as no limit - makes finding equilibrium very profound and complicated. It is assumed that a human can not replicate a GTO solve for the game of NLH.

23 July 2026 at 11:54 AM
Reply...

1 Reply



This is all very relevant to me.

As a self-taught hobbyist without access to post-flop solvers, I had to learn using free resources online, but even before that, my first instinct was to utilize all the real-life knowledge I have and convert it into a part of the poker toolset.

I have started religiously taking notes on all hands played at the table, carefully monitoring for patterns in betting sizes, scanning for tells. It's unbelievable how much information they leak this way. The first line in all of my notes will be what RFI sizes they use - very often the tells start there already.

Interestingly enough, I will use your live example and chat with recs at the table, often gaining critical information after big pots, as they will pretty much always tell me what they had after a big fold - this is priceless. It's funny how regs are too busy to pay attention to details which actually allow you to stack the whale.

On a funny note, I even managed to use the "of course I lied, it's poker, Phil" line twice after giving them false information during their long tank to make a river decision; I felt sad both times this has happened, but it was funny nevertheless. Will you show if I fold, asked a recreational recently. I answered a different question, telling him I have 2P while sitting on a nut flush; he snap called afterwards.

Once we have a sufficient amount evidence to make an exploitative play, we still should only make a relatively small detour from our equilibrium game.

Making larger detours from theory based purely on reads is what often gets me into serious trouble. (It also wins me a lot of money.) Theory as baseline has proven over and over to be the best foundation.

Reply...