NL2 6-max - KJs UTG, turn top two, river spot

NL2 6-max - KJs UTG, turn top two, river spot

Hero (121bb) UTG with KJ
BTN (86.5bb)

Villain is 30/17 over 30 hands (small sample, no other reads).

Hero opens KJ UTG to 2bb, CO (28bb) calls, BTN calls.

Flop (7.5bb): J 5 3

Hero checks, CO checks, BTN bets 3.5bb, Hero calls, CO calls.

Turn (18bb): K

Hero checks, CO checks, BTN bets 8.5bb, Hero raises to 25.5bb, CO folds, BTN calls.

River (69bb): A

Hero checks, BTN bets 52bb.

Hero?

My thoughts:

* Multiway I checked flop with TPGK.
* Turn felt like a clear value raise after improving to top two.
* River completes the front-door flush, QT gets there, and Ax improves.
* Villain calls the turn raise and then bets ~75% pot when checked to on the river.

Against a 30/17 profile (albeit over only 30 hands), is this a standard fold at NL2 population level, or should we be defending top two here sometimes?

Also interested in thoughts on the flop check and turn raise sizing.

02 June 2026 at 11:09 AM
Reply...

4 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

Played absolutely fine, painful fold on the river.


by boulgakov

Played absolutely fine, painful fold on the river.

On a wet dynamic board, we're never leading multi-way?


by LordPoshington

On a wet dynamic board, we're never leading multi-way

Thanks guys.

My main uncertainty was the river. Flop check felt standard to me given it's multiway and the board is fairly dynamic.

On the river, after BTN calls the turn raise, I was struggling to find enough worse hands that would take this sizing for value or enough missed draws that would bluff often enough at NL2. That's what pushed me towards the fold.

Do you think population at NL2 is underbluffing here, or is this a spot where we're simply folding too high up in our range?


by klm1976

NL2 is underbluffing here

In general people do not bluff as much as theory, if you have no info on villain it is more likely they just have what they say they have.

Reply...