tight fold trap bet
Last time i posted on here i posted a post about game solvers being imperfect and alas.
This time im posting about Tight, Fold, Trap and bet. This is no joke. For a beginner this has every concept. Try every combination of this and you get things like bet, bet, bet and bad. You also get tight, trap, bet, fold. Some of the concepts like fold, fold, fold, fold are just not mathematical concepts, albeit.
SO THE NEW ONE.
the new one is trap, tight, trap, TIGHT.
I am a PLO player, i will do this in NL. So we have a 53 of diamonds. Say you are planning to make a "bottom range play" preflop. Ok. So we dont elect to play fast preflop or the flop. Sounds semi-standard. So now on the turn and river, we elect to play minimal. We just dont raise randomly, and we do this to make profit.
This is kind of hard to explain. We have this strategy to balance out top hands like aces and kings. That's the post everyone.
1 Reply
the new one is trap, tight, trap, TIGHT...we have this strategy to balance out top hands like aces and kings.
The balancing angle is real at least. You do need some weak holdings in your passive lines or your trapping range becomes face-up when you check-call three streets. That said, 53s is pretty thin for this in NL specifically since you don't have the same straight and flush runout equity you'd get in PLO, so by the river you're often just torching chips with no showdown value and no fold equity. I've run similar low-connectivity slow-plays in NL and most of the time the EV just isn't there to justify it.
