USA Goes to War Against Iran
USA Goes to War Against Iran
8
zs

USA Goes to War Against Iran

Time for a dedicated thread to the war.

How long will it last and what will be the probable outcome?

02 March 2026 at 06:37 PM
Reply...

5346 Replies

8
zs


by checkraisdraw m

Yeah it is weird how someone who had to be corrected about the elementary school being closed who probably knows **** all about it has such a strong opinion on it.

And SRM probably thinks you’re a serial killer in the making because you make excuses for over 20 people getting gunned down by saying it’s fake. Delusions and serial killing go together.

Whatever corrections you think you made exist in your own imaginary world and not reality.


by geezerchess m

Because it's labeled a 'conspiracy theory', which obviates any and all discussion because it might offend folks who don't even read this forum and never will. (Or something like that.)

I think it's just because they want the kids to be dead personally. Victor knows about this.


by Victor m

you should compare the civilian and child deaths in Ukraine vs every war the USA and the Jewish State start. Putin is basically the 3rd most moral leader of our era, behind Xi and Kim Jong.

Been over this multiple times in the IP thread.


by DoyleBrunsonFan m

Jalfrezi’s entire world view is based off Twitter posts from non-experts like rappers and bots. Every time he posts it’s an embarrassment. The only thing Iran is stomping all over is their own citizens.

He’s a troll. These people live to hate.


by DoyleBrunsonFan m

Been over this multiple times in the IP thread.

right, you support when the West deliberately murders children. esp the most elite of the White Western class does the murder.


by Victor m

the only person not allowed to talk about Sandy Hook is luckbox. the reason you guys keep bringing it up is bc you cant refute his arguments about whatever the topic at hand is.

the last time Sandy Hook was brought up and discussed seriously he was completely embarrassed. He made up something easily refuted and chalked it up to “oh it was a long time ago I researched it”. But I’m sure the Jews were behind Sandy Hook, granpa


by Luckbox Inc m

Whatever corrections you think you made exist in your own imaginary world and not reality.

Just like coordi threatening to shoot your dog, right? You’re not exactly a reliable narrator.


by checkraisdraw m

the last time Sandy Hook was brought up and discussed seriously he was completely embarrassed. He made up something easily refuted and chalked it up to “oh it was a long time ago I researched it”. But I’m sure the Jews were behind Sandy Hook, granpa

You're just making stuff up.


I dont have any opinions on Sandy Hook. but the fact is that you guys are the ones who keep bringing it up. not luckbox.


by checkraisdraw m

Just like coordi threatening to shoot your dog, right? You’re not exactly a reliable narrator.

I'd like to see Coordi try to shoot my dog.


by DoyleBrunsonFan m

Are you not a mod? I thought green name = mod. Who is the ****** mod authorizing Sandy Hook conspiracy theory threads?

I was a mod, but I passed the baton a long time ago.


by Victor m

I dont have any opinions on Sandy Hook. but the fact is that you guys are the ones who keep bringing it up. not luckbox.

I don't know who brought it up this time, but it definitely wasn't me.


by Victor m

fwiw Iran denies any US naval ships passed through. and an anonymous "regional" (whatever that means) source told Bloomberg the same. so who knows what actually did or didnt happen.

https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/204305...

Sounds like that happened after they made it through
[QUOTE= Fortune]
Hormuz on April 11, 2026.U.S. Central Command
U.S. Navy ships sent an unmistakable signal Saturday as they crossed the Strait of Hormuz, challenging Iran’s control over the narrow waterway that will likely determine the outcome of the Middle East war.
The USS Michael Murphy turned on its automatic identification system as it and another destroyer, the USS Frank E. Peterson, transited the strait, breaking the typical protocol of Navy ships sailing with their AIS turned off.
“You just don’t throw AIS on by accident on a Navy ship,” Campbell University professor Salvatore Mercogliano, who specializes in military and maritime history, said on his podcast. “This is purposeful. They wanted to turn this on on the far side of the Strait of Hormuz to demonstrate that they have sailed through.”
As a result, the IRGC challenged the Navy destroyers as they transited, according to a radio conversation recorded by a civilian ship that was shared with the Wall Street Journal.
“This is the last warning. This is the last warning,” the IRGC said.
“Passage in accordance with international law. No challenge is intended to you, and I intend to abide by rules of our government’s ceasefire,” the U.S. ship replied.
Iranian media said the destroyers turned around after being confronted by the IRGC, which reportedly launched a drone in the direction of the destroyers. The IRGC also said any attempt by military ships to cross the strait would be met with a “firm and forceful response.”

In a statement, Admiral Brad Cooper said Central Command is “establishing a new passage” for the maritime industry for the free flow of commerce.[/QUOTE]


by Luckbox Inc m

If I have complaints about how this forum is run then those have nothing to do with whatever conspiracy theories I might want to discuss

I agree that you never complain. To the extent my previous post misleadingly suggested otherwise, I apologize.


by Luckbox Inc m

I think it's just because they want the kids to be dead personally. Victor knows about this.

Whenever there is a school shooting, my personal desires are completely irrelevant. People either are dead or they are not dead.


by Rococo m

I agree that you never complain. To the extent my previous post miseladingly suggested that you were complaining, I apologize.

first jokes and now spelling.

One day you will make the irregular verb joke and I will chortle in my grave


by Rococo m

For ****'s sake, do you even remember why discussion of LB's Sandy Hook theories was circumscribed for such a long time?

Actually, I don't. I don't recall even engaging that topic much. I never knew much about the details of the conspiracy theory.

Past history aside, I don't think you or Luckbox have any reason to complain now. All limits on conspiracy stuff seem to have been abandoned. You have the forum you want. If someone wanted to fire up the siege engines and accuse the parents of murdered children of being crisis actors, I think that would be permitted.

I wasn't complaining. I was just trying to find out what the line of demarcation is on these things.

My understanding about this forum is essentially that we're all guests here at the 2p2 playhouse, and the administrators and mods can set any rules they want and if me or anyone else doesn't like it we can up and leave and take our balls home with us.


by Rococo m

I don't know who brought it up this time, but it definitely wasn't me.

It was SRM who brought it up first in one of his rants.


by geezerchess m

Actually, I don't. I don't recall even engaging that topic much. I never knew much about the details of the conspiracy theory.

OK. My perspective is informed by context that you apparently did not consider.

I wasn't complaining. I was just trying to find out what the line of demarcation is on these things.

I don't set the lines of demarcation, but my impression is that anything goes.

My understanding about this forum is essentially that we're all guests here at the 2p2 playhouse, and the administrators and mods can set any rules they want and if me or anyone else doesn't like it we can up and leave and take our balls home with us.

Obviously. Did anyone suggest otherwise?


by Rococo m

OK. My perspective is informed by context that you apparently did not consider.

+1

I don't set the lines of demarcation, but my impression is that anything goes.

+1

Obviously. Did anyone suggest otherwise?

Not that I know of.


by Victor m

I dont have any opinions on Sandy Hook. but the fact is that you guys are the ones who keep bringing it up. not luckbox.

It’s kind of weird to not have opinions on Sandy Hook. And yes, I will keep bringing up that he is a Sandy Hook Truther. If someone was a holocaust denier I’d keep bringing that up too. Just like you think that Israel is doing genocide and keep bringing it up. Lol at you complaining about people bringing up topics out of nowhere.


by Luckbox Inc m

You're just making stuff up.

Did coordi threaten to kill your dog?


by checkraisdraw m

It’s kind of weird to not have opinions on Sandy Hook. And yes, I will keep bringing up that he is a Sandy Hook Truther. If someone was a holocaust denier I’d keep bringing that up too. Just like you think that Israel is doing genocide and keep bringing it up. Lol at you complaining about people bringing up topics out of nowhere.

its not really the same. I bring up Israel and the USA doing genocide bc it is pertinent to the discussion and the forum topics. luckbox's offtopic opinions, or anyone's oftopic opinions really, arent really worth talking about over and over again. otherwise I would just call you and much of the rest of the forum Holocaust deniers for your insane ideas about Gaza. but that would get old fast.


by Luckbox Inc m

It's strange how the people with the strongest opinions about Sandy Hook know basically nothing about it.

I wonder if there is anything else where complete ignorance generates such strong opinions.

I never researched what happened but I’m gonna take a look. When you have situations with many “coincidences” it does make you wonder.

I’ll be back with my findings.

Maybe I’ll start a thread about Sandyhook.


by Luckbox Inc m

US seems to be playing some sort of insane game of chicken by trying to put boats in the straight. Iran has said they'll be blown up if they don't turn around. And I don't understand what the US gains from sending them in there? If the talks fail and war resumes they're going to be blown up and it seems like a completely unnecessary prevocation.

its called a power move? idk its literally that. Either they try to blow it up(and fail) and their the *******s. or they don't try and they are weak

Reply...