President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
So now Trump is obsessed with shitty dress shoes?
https://www.thetimes.com/us/american-pol...
Now, facing murmurings of discontent in the Maga movement over his appetite for foreign wars, the spiralling cost of oil and a potentially damaging set of midterms later this year, Trump has cobbled together a sartorial solution to encourage Republican unity: a $145 pair of dress shoes.
The president is giving pairs from his favourite brand to members of his administration, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, JD Vance, the vice-president and Pete Hegseth, the secretary of war, have all received a pair of Florsheim shoes in recent months. Others presented with the brand’s classic lace-ups include the Fox News host Sean Hannity, the senator Lindsey Graham and the Maga celebrity Tucker Carlson.
So now Trump is obsessed with shitty dress shoes?
Marco Rubio Roasted for Wearing Clown Shoes Trump Bought Him
Reporter: "Mr. President, you just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war. But you're the only person in your government saying this. Even your Defense secretary wouldn't say that when he was asked standing over your shoulder on your plane on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?"
Trump: "Because I just don't know enough about it. I think it's something that I was told is under investigation, but Tomahawks are used by others, as you know. Numerous other nations have Tomahawks — they buy them from us. But … whatever the report shows, I'm willing to live with that report."
Wild.
Kinda like Florsheims, soft soles. Have a pair on my office shoe rack for swapping as needed.
$145 is a ripoff tho. Hit up Nordstrom rack, they got em for 95.
[...]As for escorting ships through, this will be a complicated operation. On a normal day, some 50-100 ships pass through the strait and now you have to add to that all the thousands of ships that are currently stuck. Bunching ships up in formation makes air cover easier, but also makes it richer for targets. On the flip side, keeping them spread makes it more difficult to
To continue this post, we seem to finally have our answer: Reuters reports that as per statements from the US navy to shipping executives, it is not currently feasible to escort ships through the strait.
If that report is accurate, and since Iranian attacks on shipping through the strait was the most predictable outcome of the war, we can derive a fairly simple conclusion: The outcome of the initial operation was misjudged, resources and plans were not put in place in case the desired outcome was not reached. Not a good look.
The war is now very much in the limbo phase of "****ing around and finding out". What Iran's future will be is not clear for anyone except pundits willing to gamble on being able to tell "I told you so" in the future. As for the near future, Iran's capacities have been hit hard, but the old Iranian regime has simply been replaced with an even worse one. Its stability is anyone's guess, but probably depends more on events in Iran than on American and Israeli bombs.
Trump should just keep upping the ante and starting insisting that his people begin turning themselves orange.
It's not about intellect. You juat chose to hold yourself to an incredibly low to nonexistent standard.
It's not about intellect. You juat chose to hold yourself to an incredibly low to nonexistent standard.
and the least shocking thing of all is you think intellectual and intellect are the same thing
and the least shocking thing of all is you think intellectual and intellect are the same thing
I'm not sure this gotcha works.
and the least shocking thing of all is you think intellectual and intellect are the same thing
Rickroll, what shape is the Earth?
Just doing random spot checks, it's not anything you said, promise.
I'm not sure this gotcha works.
that's one definition, there are many others which disagree - maybe i took way too many philosophy classes in college but those two things have always been distinct and different, if that exact exact happened in one of my college classes, there would indeed have been snickers at td assuming lozen was stating that td was smarter than he was
there's often an overlap because deep thinking is usually ignored by the idiots but there's a lot of really stupid people who would qualify as intellectuals
think of the i'm 16 and this is deep kind of stuff - that's all very intellectual thinking despite that it's coming from absolute idiots
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectu...
- lots of discussion here
most anyone browsing or posting here would be considered an intellectual, but we all know most of us are idiots
that's one definition, there are many others which disagree - maybe i took way too many philosophy classes in college but those two things have always been distinct and different, if that exact exact happened in one of my college classes, there would indeed have been snickers at td assuming lozen was stating that td was smarter than he wasthere's often an overlap because deep t
I understand the distinction, but your post implied that eda somehow misused or misunderstood the meanings of those two words, which simply isn't true in light of the definition I cited.
What a train in thought
Everyone: America bombs elementary school
Trump: fake news, iran did it to itself
Everyone: America admitted to doing it
Trump, literally the president of the United States: well, I’m just telling you what I was told
Also trump: but if we did it that’s fine too
Trump: "Based on what Steve and Jared and Pete and others were telling me, Marco is so involved, I thought they were going to attack us"
Always the hero, always the victim.
When you are bad and stupid and you surround yourself with bad and stupid then there isn't much that could come out except bad and stupid. Go figure.
When you are bad and stupid and you surround yourself with bad and stupid then there isn't much that could come out except bad and stupid. Go figure.
It's just so bizarre a president admitting to invading a country based on intel provided by a handful of morons. At this point saying ''Bibi told me to do it'' would sound better than admitting you acted on intel provided by a real estate developer, a tv host and his son in law....
what did you mean when you said "Lol!" to the video about bombing other countries?
