[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
Do squares exist, Billy? Lines? Or do shapes not exist at all? Can you list some things that exist?
None of these things have objective reality, they don't exist. Platonic philosophy 101.
Judging by your avatar you have some interest in maths. Do you just add and subtract without deeper consideration to the philosophical implications? Are you no better than a calculator? Replaced by AI within 2 years? An NPC?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
None of these things have objective reality, they don't exist. Platonic philosophy 101.
Judging by your avatar you have some interest in maths. Do you just add and subtract without deeper consideration to the philosophical implications? Are you no better than a calculator? Replaced by AI within 2 years? An NPC?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I'm nowhere near as good as a calculator, which is handy, since I have very little interest in basic arithmetic.
Ok, so shapes do not exist. What about physical objects having those shapes? Do circular objects exist? Spherical objects? Now, obviously we can't have a perfect circle or sphere in real life. Do we have a tolerance within which we can consider something "round"? What shape is a pool ball?
I mean, he doesn't exactly ignore it... he resolves it by claiming that no real science has been done since... well, since the time humanity thought the Earth was flat. Everything after that is just not real science.
I mean, he doesn't exactly ignore it... he resolves it by claiming that no real science has been done since... well, since the time humanity thought the Earth was flat. Everything after that is just not real science.
I’ll take schmience over the realm of platonic objects, although the idea that if the earth is not a perfect sphere that we can’t talk about spheroids is obviously dumb. that’s not just ignoring science, that’s also ignoring developments in math, engineering, geometry, calculus.
I want to know from Billy what the shape of a pool ball or a ball bearing is.
I’ll take schmience over the realm of platonic objects, although the idea that if the earth is not a perfect sphere that we can’t talk about spheroids is obviously dumb. that’s not just ignoring science, that’s also ignoring developments in math, engineering, geometry, calculus.
Schmience on steroids.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Holy shit
You just said shapes don't exist.
Now you want the shape of an object.
Speak coherently.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I assure you any lack of coherence on my part can be directly attributed to attempting to follow your "thought" process.
Do objects have forms on your planet, or are they all amorphous blobs? If so, what word do you use to describe the form of an object? And what is the form of a pool ball?
Or is it PPS on your plane?
I assure you any lack of coherence on my part can be directly attributed to attempting to follow your "thought" process.
Do objects have forms on your planet, or are they all amorphous blobs? If so, what word do you use to describe the form of an object? And what is the form of a pool ball?
How am I responsible for your degenerate questions as these?
Why are you begging the question of planet, the thing you allegedly want to prove or want me to disprove or whatever your crusade is currently?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Billy, Billy boy, William. Why so evasive? You seem to selectively respond only to a small subset of the questions you're asked, and even then only to quibble over semantics. Why so circumspect, brosef? Surely you've thought all this through...
Billy, Billy boy, William. Why so evasive? You seem to selectively respond only to a small subset of the questions you're asked, and even then only to quibble over semantics. Why so circumspect, brosef? Surely you've thought all this through...
Semantics is most important.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
