Is The Epstein Pivot That Big A Deal

Is The Epstein Pivot That Big A Deal

How much of the original allegations are actually now denied? Is it not possible that the only thing that has changed is

09 July 2025 at 03:30 PM
Reply...

876 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

Source: it came to me in a dream


yes, as I literally said, that is my interpretation.



but hey, maybe they didnt murder her and just raped her in a Jesus outfit. imagine the Zionist brain rot required to go to bat for the Epstein class after reading that post from formula.



by Victor

but hey, maybe they didnt murder her and just raped her in a Jesus outfit. imagine the Zionist brain rot required to go to bat for the Epstein class after reading that post from formula.

go to bat for the epstein class? you’re ******ed and should stop jacking off to children.


by checkraisdraw

go to bat for the epstein class? you’re ******ed and should stop jacking off to children.

yes, thats what you do when you support Israel and the US ruling class. and that whats you do directly when you come into this thread and joke at the real allegations from these files.


by Victor

yes, thats what you do when you support Israel and the US ruling class. and that whats you do directly when you come into this thread and joke at the real allegations from these files.

the real allegations like making up meanings for supposed codewords? that’s amazing.

and you’re a pedophile for going to bat for the religion of marrying and ****ing 9 year olds because god told you in a dream that they were meant to be your wife. your virgin child bride is coming soon sicko.


by checkraisdraw

the real allegations like making up meanings for supposed codewords? that’s amazing.

like I said, keep going to bat for the Epstein class. maybe you get an invite to the next Island.


by Victor

they say Whoops a lot in the emails. I am fairly convinced its used when they murder someone.

Murder tends to create an evidence trail. It is a difficult crime to conceal. At minimum there is a missing person, last known whereabouts etc, and it's remarkably difficult to get rid of a body. You need a bit more than 'Somebody said whoops in an email.'


by 57 On Red

Murder tends to create an evidence trail. It is a difficult crime to conceal. At minimum there is a missing person, last known whereabouts etc, and it's remarkably difficult to get rid of a body. You need a bit more than “Somebody said whoops in an email.”

while i agree with your general premise, the idea that someone with his kind of resources couldn’t figure out how to obscure provenance or muddy the evidentiary trail is extremely naive. especially when things are happening on a private island he controlled and far away from normal day to day oversight. the quality and even existence of evidence can be scrubbed or just simply fade over time and he never had a local sheriff down the road who would just pop on over to do a wellness check because he heard screams in the middle of the night - for evidence to be found, someone would have to alert the authorities in a timely and convincingly enough manner to both get a search warrant and want to figure out the process and jurisdiction of sending agents to the island to go on a fact finding mission

most trafficking operates on the assumption that friends and family are either misled or completely in the dark. it is rarely as simple as someone openly saying “my 16 year old daughter is on a private jet flying to an island to party with billionaires.” deception and isolation are usually part of the mechanism, which is why the absence of an obvious public trail does not mean nothing could have happened

you're treating this like you or i decided to kill someone who was at our bbq - in which i'd agree that'd be difficult to cover up cleanly, even if all the other bbq guests were in on it


by 57 On Red

Murder tends to create an evidence trail. It is a difficult crime to conceal. At minimum there is a missing person, last known whereabouts etc, and it's remarkably difficult to get rid of a body. You need a bit more than 'Somebody said whoops in an email.'

well there is also the private island, submarine, and 100s of gallons of sulfuric acid. and tons of witness/victim documentation.


Ex-Prince Andrew just got arrested.


Charge is fairly meaningless, but this why it could be a big deal.

Dal Babu, former Metropolitan Police Chief Superintendent, tells BBC News that pressure has been "growing and growing" over the last few weeks.

The ex-senior police officer says that by arresting Andrew, police will be able "to access computer equipment, files, photographs, any other evidence".

He also says officers "can carry out searches of any premises he owns or occupies, or any other premises he controls, so there may well be searches in other areas as well".


I suspect when he was relocated from London to Norfolk he was tipped off and got rid of all the hardware containing incriminating evidence, leaving a bunch of Epstein emails.


by thethethe

What Jamie Raskin saw in the unredacted ...

Should really be calling them the Trump Files.

I hope the unredacted Epstein files are leaked soon.




oh if you are wondering, yes she is.


Julie Brown is the Miami newspaper reporter that broke the Epstein story years ago btw.

anyway, really weird that Israel set up cameras all over Epstein's pedophile torture apartment.


wrong thread


by jalfrezi

I suspect when he was relocated from London to Norfolk he was tipped off and got rid of all the hardware containing incriminating evidence, leaving a bunch of Epstein emails.

He probably got rid of everything, but on the other hand this guy doesn't strike me as a brainiac so it wouldn't shock me if they find stuff.


Like his siblings he's as thick as two short planks (hardly surprising when you consider the parents) and as intellectually incurious as you'd expect from someone this privileged.



Did Jeffrey Epstein really eat babies? What fact-checkers say about cannibalism and ritual sacrifice

According to DOJ records cited by Snopes, the anonymous man claimed he witnessed extreme abuse aboard Epstein’s yacht in 2000.

In an email to FBI officials, the man alleged that he “was a victim of a type of ritualistic sacrifice in which his feet were cut with a scimitar, but left no scarring. On the yacht, he witnessed babies being dismembered, their intestines removed, and individuals eating the faeces from these intestines.”

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-new...

...

The U.S. Department of Justice's documents released in January 2026 pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein reference cannibalism and accuse Epstein, or his inner circle, of engaging in "ritualistic sacrifice."

Rating: True


Purported Jeffrey Epstein suicide note unsealed

The note released Wednesday reads, in part, “They investigated me for months — found nothing!!!”

It continues: “It is a treat to be able to choose one’s time to say goodbye. Watcha want me to do — bust out cryin!!”

The message ends: “NO FUN — NOT WORTH IT!!”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/pur...


by formula72

"she said that she felt gods presence next to her when she was in bed.. she knows jesus watches over her. and he helped save her life. Whoops"

Epstein then appeared to respond approvingly, referencing what he described as a “Jesus I’m coming” trick.
"Of course, the OH jesus Im coming trick," he wrote.

These guys really are just like the creeps who abduct kids into their cars or trawl online chats for victims.

They just happen to have yachts and expensive lawyers.

Reply...