[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
Where are these textbooks, Brosef Billy? Textbooks, now!
Until we settle the competing claims of the uniturtle and multiturtle models, it's all rather up in the air.
Textbooks? Nah you just need the year 6 curriculum. That's primary school in the UK. Ages 10-11.
Bbc bitesize baby. No need to get overwhelmed. Bitesize chunks. Say 10 mins, no say 5 mins per day. Have sundays off.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zs...
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Ok, so let's see where this supports your theories about gravity. Specific link. Now!
Man, seems like you should have figured that out first before trying to lecture people about science. Those claiming an experiment but refuse to give the 3 necessary constituent parts of said experiment:
D2
Willd
Gorgo
Didace
Also trolly or are you staying out of this?
I'm not doing your homework for you. Look up the Big 3 yourself and then get back to us.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
So, Billy Goat, do I understand correctly that you reject Newton's law of universal gravitation, and you have your own law of terrestrial gravitation instead? Or do both laws work together on Earth but only Newton's in the rest of the universe? Or just TG on Earth and NG everywhere else?
In fact, let's make it easy. Just put an X in the boxes where applicable, I've done the first one for you:
[code]
TG NG
Earth [X] [ ]
Not Earth [ ] [ ]
[/code]
I'd just like to say that I think billy is doing a great job providing cover while Deuces is on vacation. Keep up the good work, little buddy.
Those claiming an experiment but refuse to give the 3 necessary constituent parts of said experiment:
D2
Willd
Gorgo
Didace
Also trolly or are you staying out of this?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I do think you make good points and I respect the effort - same with Deuces with 911 and Nut Nut with his climate concerns but I really am in good faith curious about a few questions if you can break away for a sec.
How big is the sun and how far away is it in your estimation and why is it completely dark in Tokyo while bright as **** in NYC?
So, Billy Goat, do I understand correctly that you reject Newton's law of universal gravitation, and you have your own law of terrestrial gravitation instead? Or do both laws work together on Earth but only Newton's in the rest of the universe? Or just TG on Earth and NG everywhere else?In fact, let's make it easy. Just put an X in the boxes where applicable, I've done the firs
I understand you reject science and its methodology.
Just don't even TRY to claim scientific support for your batshit conspiracy theories about wtc.
Billy be watching you closely.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I do think you make good points and I respect the effort - same with Deuces with 911 and Nut Nut with his climate concerns but I really am in good faith curious about a few questions if you can break away for a sec.
How big is the sun and how far away is it in your estimation and why is it completely dark in Tokyo while bright as **** in NYC?
How about you.
What's an experiment?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I do think you make good points and I respect the effort - same with Deuces with 911 and Nut Nut with his climate concerns but I really am in good faith curious about a few questions if you can break away for a sec.
How big is the sun and how far away is it in your estimation and why is it completely dark in Tokyo while bright as **** in NYC?
Ok i'll tell you one thing about the Sun. The thermonuclear model is falsified by coronal and photospheric temperatures. See Ralph Juergens and Hannes Alfven. It is because of the time required for Darwinian evolution that we are lumbered with the thermonuclear Sun despite it failing observations.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Ralph Juergens
Damn man, we have an electric sun as well as a flat earth now. Boy, Santa has been good to me this year!
You also.
Explain the discrepency in photosphere and coronal temperatures WITHOUT reference, directly or indirectly, to the work of either Ralph Juergens or Hannes Alfven.
Yeah thought so.
Oh and tell us what an experiment is before further posting. You're in the interview stage pal.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I'll give it a shot (from memory):
Scientific Method in Six Steps:
1. Define/Identify the phenomenon to be investigated.
2. Formulate an hypothesis that explains the phenomenon.
3. Recognize the logical implications of the hypothesis.
4. Gather data.
5. Analyze and evaluate the data.
6. Evaluate the hypothesis in light of the data.
I'll give it a shot (from memory):
Scientific Method in Six Steps:
1. Define/Identify the phenomenon to be investigated.
2. Formulate an hypothesis that explains the phenomenon.
3. Recognize the logical implications of the hypothesis.
4. Gather data.
5. Analyze and evaluate the data.
6. Evaluate the hypothesis in light of the data.
So, not anal beads?
