[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
One thing this clown and Deuces have in common is ignoring any burden of proof of any of their claims and then demanding you jump through their hoops. Doesn't work like that.And here's a tip. If you have a point to make about the necessary components of an experiment, asking others to name them does not help your point at all. The truth does not change if d2 does or does not kn
Burden of proof? Good idea.
Responsibility on those who claim Cavendish as an experiment to give the 3 necessary parts of an experiment.
What are they?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Man, seems like you should have figured that out first before trying to lecture people about science.
Those claiming an experiment but refuse to give the 3 necessary constituent parts of said experiment:
D2
Willd
Gorgo
Didace
Also trolly or are you staying out of this?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
No you are a 10 year old student of Science. They are expected to know this.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Ooh, I know this one. It's raindrops on roses, whiskers on kittens, bright copper kettles, and warm woollen mittens. I know that's four, but I really like all of them, must I get rid of one?
Anyway, dipshit, I told you, you get nish here till you start coming up with some of these sources you claimed to have. You promised us textbooks and all sorts, and all we've had is your incessant babbling, repeating the same gibberish over and over again.
I didn't "claim an experiment" you fing weirdo. I'm just here to laugh at you, not engage with you.
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/physic...
the science that deals with matter, energy, motion, and force.
Ignore the haters, Billy Bro. He's just jealous of our utopia.
Where's the one billy provided? I don't remember him providing anything, might have missed that too.
Here, in my infinite generosity
Physics is the establishment of successful hypotheses, i.e. theories, describing and explaining phenomena in the natural world, in accordance with the scientific method, i.e. proven by experiment. Physics IS science, not a list of curricula that might be found on a course called physics.
Now gimme the three constituent parts of an experiment. Feck it, just gimme what an experiment IS. You say experimental proof of "classical gravity", you say Cavendish. So what is an experiment? Hmm?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I think on the whole that, as a spectator sport, pigeon chess may be a bit overrated.
Here, in my infinite generosity
Now gimme the three constituent parts of an experiment. Feck it, just gimme what an experiment IS. You say experimental proof of "classical gravity", you say Cavendish. So what is an experiment? Hmm?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I would say if a theory successfully predicts the orbits of the planets and the motion of other celestial bodies, it "agrees with experiment".
Also, I know what you *want* me to say, I'm just not spending any energy on you until you provide these textbooks you claim to have, or any other evidence supporting your kooky gravity views.
I would say if a theory successfully predicts the orbits of the planets and the motion of other celestial bodies, it "agrees with experiment".
Also, I know what you *want* me to say, I'm just not spending any energy on you until you provide these textbooks you claim to have, or any other evidence supporting your kooky gravity views.
Really, so what is an experiment?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I would say if a theory successfully predicts the orbits of the planets and the motion of other celestial bodies, it "agrees with experiment".
Also, I know what you *want* me to say, I'm just not spending any energy on you until you provide these textbooks you claim to have, or any other evidence supporting your kooky gravity views.
You either
A) do not know the answer.
B) know the answer.
If (B) then you will know you have absolutely no hope of supporting your claim of experimental evidence supporting universal gravitation. Goodbye Cavendish.
If (A) then it's goodbye d2_e4. (English descriptive anyone?)
Either way, hubris. And karma, karma too.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
