Israel/Palestine thread
Think this merits its own thread...
Discuss my fellow 2+2ers..
AM YISRAEL CHAI.
[QUOTE=Crossnerd]
Only thing from the NY Times I'm getting is from 2016 in an article entitled "dissecting the #pizzagate conspiracies."Which talks of "false rumours "regarding Pizzzagate.https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016... Here's the sources a google search turns up
I'm aware of the babies claim, I was talking about the claim that Epstein engaged in cannibalism and there's no mention of that in your linked article and it sounds like bullshit anyway, especially this bit:
He was a victim of a type of ritualistic sacrifice in which his feet were cut with a scimitar but left no scarring.
Again these claims are nothing new, Regina Louf made similar claims of being raped with a straight razor at elitist parties n the Marc Dutroux affair. That also coincidentally left no scarring either. In numerous Satanic Ritual Abuse claims over the years there were lurid tales of babies being sacrificed, again with zero evidence to back the claims up. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and so far, the claims in that article don't sound credible to me at all.
You said this, within the context of your claim re Cannibal torture rings
So be more clear in future, anyone would infer that from what you said
in other words, I dont think the NY Times determines truth on this. or anything. you do. thats your argument. you wont believe anything unless a Zionist or the mainstream press tells you to believe it. I, however, am able to read the emails and make my own determinations.
So absolutely nothing after two years of blatant lies and holocaust denial. Cool.
Calling what happened in Gaza a holocaust, akin to the Jewish holocaust, is holocaust denial, because it trivializes what happened during the holocaust. Not every ethnic conflict is a holocaust bud.
its not my fault if you live under a rock and havent seen the damning emails yet. but we all know that you guys delight in bad faith. probably bc you hope to be invited to the isles someday.
in other words, I dont think the NY Times determines truth on this. or anything. you do. thats your argument. you wont believe anything unless a Zionist or the mainstream press tells you to believe it. I, however, am able to read the emails and make my own determinations.
In other words, you were being your usual garbled self, okay.
As in the emails you keep refusing to link, those ones? There's no mention of Epstein engaging in cannibalism (lol) so your claim re him (and somehow Israel) running a cannibalistic torture ring is derisively dismissed.
its not my fault that you cant read.
you said that just bc there were emails that doesnt make this stuff true. guess what, I agree! I then said, even if the NYT reported it still wouldnt make them true.
you gotta make your own decisions on this stuff. I personally think they are true, bc I have seen all of the disgusting behavior of Zionists for the past 3 years and bc I have opened up a history book and read about all of the disgusting behavior of the West.
you think that Jews can do no wrong and that just by virtue of someone being Jewish then they are Superior to the rest of the world. I look at Jews the same way I look at anyone else.
its not my fault if you live under a rock and havent seen the damning emails yet. but we all know that you guys delight in bad faith. probably bc you hope to be invited to the isles someday.
lol that insult doesn’t even make sense. if I don’t know what’s going on with the island why would I want to be invited to it?
there are probably tens of thousands of emails, I can’t possibly know every single one you’re referencing or what interpretation you’re laying over a set of emails. it’s the most bad faith thing to make vague references and then accuse others of living under a rock for not getting them.
its not my fault that you cant read.you said that just bc there were emails that doesnt make this stuff true. guess what, I agree! I then said, even if the NYT reported it still wouldnt make them true. you gotta make your own decisions on this stuff. I personally think they are true, bc I have seen all of the disgusting behavior of Zionists for the past 3 years and bc I hav
No you're just inarticulate. Several posters have called you on it in the past and you always without fail whinge that everyone else can't read or has reading comprehension issues. You're incapable of posting coherently half the time and that's on you, nobody else.
I have no opinion on Jews as a demographic, I haven't met them all. And you clearly don't see Jews as you see everyone else. You never would have made a comment about "Jews" and assumptions on how I feel about "Jews", pretty much apropos of nothing otherwise. But continue being you.
You still haven't linked these emails and I already provided a fact check which claimed bullshit, so I'm going with that.
Btw, thoughts on your boy Chomsky in the files? Seems he had more than just a financial relationship with the late not so great one., despite his professed stance
Perhaps most strikingly, in late February 2019, Epstein represented to an associate that he had gotten advice from Chomsky over how to navigate “the horrible way you are being treated in the press and public”. That was 11 years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution – and months before he would reportedly die by suicide while in federal custody awaiting sex-trafficking charges.
“The best way to proceed is to ignore it,” Chomsky wrote, according to text signed under his first name that Epstein sent to a lawyer and publicist. “That’s particularly true now with the hysteria that has developed about abuse of women, which has reached the point that even questioning a charge is a crime worse than murder.”
Things that make you go hmmmm.
I wonder if he advised Weinstein as well...
lol that insult doesn’t even make sense. if I don’t know what’s going on with the island why would I want to be invited to it?there are probably tens of thousands of emails, I can’t possibly know every single one you’re referencing or what interpretation you’re laying over a set of emails. it’s the most bad faith thing to make vague references and then accuse others of living u
Yeah especially when he persistently refuses to provide the actual excerpts.
You still haven't linked these emails and I already provided a fact check which claimed bullshit, so I'm going with that.
your link literally admitted that there were emails about cannibalism.
Btw, thoughts on your boy Chomsky in the files? Seems he had more than just a financial relationship with the late not so great one., despite his professed stance
Things that make you go hmmmm.
I wonder if he advised Weinstein as well...
you are misremembering things. I am the guy who said that obv Chomsky had much more of a relationship with Epstein than he let on and that there was no excuse for this. checkrais is the one who threw an absolute tantrum when I made this mundane observation.
anyway, Ive always preferred Parenti and obv was further vindicated here.
Are you being intentionally obtuse here or are you really this ****ing thick? It didn't say anything about Epstein wrt cannibalism and in fact called bullshit on the claim. And you STILL haven't provided excerpts or links to the actual mf'ng emails you keep banging on about anyway.
you are misremembering things. I am the guy who said that obv Chomsky had much more of a relationship with Epstein than he let on and that there was no excuse for this. checkrais is the one who threw an absolute tantrum when I made this mundane observation.
anyway, Ive always preferred Parenti and obv was further vindicated here.
Ah so you're not an admirer of ole Noam? My bad so.
I was fine with Chomsky despite his shortcomings on the Communism, the Soviet Union, electoral politics, and Imperialism until he came up in the Epstein files back in the summer iirc.
still, like I said, I always preferred Parenti.
Are you being intentionally obtuse here or are you really this ****ing thick? It didn't say anything about Epstein wrt cannibalism and in fact called bullshit on the claim.
Here's the cannibalism email
[image]lt0G0oW.jpg[/im
..]
I'm aware of the babies claim, I was talking about the claim that Epstein engaged in cannibalism and there's no mention of that in your linked article and it sounds like bullshit anyway, especially this bit:Again these claims are nothing new, Regina Louf made similar claims of being raped with a straight razor at elitist parties n the Marc Dutroux affair. That also coincidental
80yo ex president raping a 3yo then they slice the kid up and feast on him. What's so hard to believe!!
I was fine with Chomsky despite his shortcomings on the Communism, the Soviet Union, electoral politics, and Imperialism until he came up in the Epstein files back in the summer iirc.
still, like I said, I always preferred Parenti.
The photo of Chomsky in a bro hug with Steve Bannon was... interesting.
Yeah thanks for that (see how easy that was vic?) and I'm aware of the actual claim as there was already a linked piece on it, my point was that there's nothing in the files naming Epstein as a cannibal.
And again I call bullshit on it anyway, for the reasons I covered in an earlier post. So vic's claim re Epstein running a cannibal torture ring to me has no merit, and in the absence of any compelling evidence, it's just pizzagae style nonsense.
Amazing day for unemployed schizos
Why did you highlight the Holocaust Memorial council? Again your colours are really showing vic
