President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
The quickest may to find out if there is any actual proof of trump doing anything wrong is to open any of the left leaning news outlets and if you see the words “we finally got the bastard” that means trump is in trouble. If the lead article title is anything other than that then they struck out again.The media and dems have worked their tails off for over 10 years trying to co
It's cute that you believe the rapist convicted felon is still a saint.
Their differences are alarming. Pretti spit at officers, threatened officers, damaged their vehicle and ignored their orders on at least 2 occasions. Rit did none of those. Rit was defending himself from a mob of rioters. Pretti was on the offensive.
All of that is utter horseshit.
It's hilarious in one post you rush to the defense of an actual rapist, and then you do your best to cast a man that was brutally murdered as a terrible human in the next.
Its a weird thing to bring up for sure. for one kyle rittenhouse was not protesting he was guarding a car lot against protestors. Its way more american then protesting with a gun if you really think about it. (stand your ground protect your property etc) I would also happily shoot protesters in the face to protect my business. its a little hypocritical for sure but if you can't see the difference you need to be put in a box.
Also important to note he surrendered to police peacefully. The guy was arguably murdered but he was definitely resisting
I’m not sure why rittenhouse is coming up. They both went to a protest with a gun but that is where the similarities stop. I’m sure a **** load of people have done that in the last 10 years so connecting them because they checked those two boxes is as silly as some connecting me and you because we both of an “e” in our username and we both like pizza. Their differences are alar
“Rit was defending himself from a mob of rioters” isn’t a good summary of the Kyle Rittenhouse situation, regardless of whether you believe he acted in self-defense.
I’m not sure why rittenhouse is coming up. They both went to a protest with a gun but that is where the similarities stop. I’m sure a **** load of people have done that in the last 10 years so connecting them because they checked those two boxes is as silly as some connecting me and you because we both of an “e” in our username and we both like pizza.
Your IQ can't be over 87. The reason why Rittenhouse is being brought up is because Noem, Kash, Trump, Homan, and a shitload right wing politicians and pundits said he shouldn't have brought a gun to a protest when they all praised Rittenhouse for exercising his 2nd Amendment rights by bringing a rifle to a protest.
Pretti spit at officers, threatened officers, damaged their vehicle and ignored their orders on at least 2 occasions. Rit did none of those. Rit was defending himself from a mob of rioters. Pretti was on the offensive.
You either have to be a total retaad to believe this or such a partisan pos that you have no shame in blatantly lying about what happened to a guy murdered in cold blood. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's the latter. What a bootlicking dipshit.
If Dems were smart, they would immediately introduce a bill banning firearms at protests and see what all these clowns have to say then.
All of that is utter horseshit.
It's hilarious in one post you rush to the defense of an actual rapist, and then you do your best to cast a man that was brutally murdered as a terrible human in the next.
I am not defending trump. I only said you know the Epstein files don’t have anything real on trump if cnn and the rest of left wing media’s top story isn’t something along the lines of “we finally got him”. I also pointed out what a relief it would have been for those companies to finally catch trump in a real scandal after 10+ years of working their tails off to do so.
To be clear I am not saying pretti deserved to die. Far from it. Just highlighting the difference of bringing a gun in defense vs. bringing a gun when the plan was likely to spit, threaten and damage the car of officers.
Your IQ can't be over 87. The reason why Rittenhouse is being brought up is because Noem, Kash, Trump, Homan, and a shitload right wing politicians and pundits said he shouldn't have brought a gun to a protest when they all praised Rittenhouse for exercising his 2nd Amendment rights by bringing a rifle to a protest.You either have to be a total retaad to believe this or such a
The people you mention brought up rit because dems were trying to compare the 2 guys. Like I said in the above posts these two guys had very different objectives at these protests. It is incredible sad to what happened to both of them.
What part of the 2nd part of my post do you disagree with? There is video of both of prettis run in with officers.
I am not defending trump. I only said you know the Epstein files don’t have anything real on trump if cnn and the rest of left wing media’s top story isn’t something along the lines of “we finally got him”. I also pointed out what a relief it would have been for those companies to finally catch trump in a real scandal after 10+ years of working their tails off to do so. To be c
He's a rapist and a conviced felon, you literal potato.
And here's a small slice of what's in those files. There's a lot more.
The people you mention brought up rit because dems were trying to compare the 2 guys.
Once again, the ONLY comparison is bringing a firearm to a protest. The Republicans are saying Pretti shouldn't have brought a firearm to a protest; between 2020-2025, they said anyone can exercise their 2nd Amendment right to bring a firearm anywhere it is legally permissible.
Even your boy "rit," as you cringily call him, supports Pretti having brought a firearm to the protests.
What part of the 2nd part of my post do you disagree with? There is video of both of prettis run in with officers.
Is it your contention that he should have been shot because he spit on a vehicle and kicked out its taillight 11 days prior, or is it your contention that a police vehicle is an actual law enforcement officer?
Bombs landing in Iran. We'll have to see if Qatar gives him the red light this time and doesn't threaten to take away the plane.
You are disregarding my post. You're right that he did nothing illegal being armed. Do you think he's shot there if he wasn't armed? If yes, well then ok. If no, refer back to my post
"if you bring a gun anywhere, bad things might happen, rightly or wrongly."
He WASN'T armed when he was shot. This is clearly shown in the actual footage. He was disarmed, ergo not armed. Then they shot him. And yet again his initially being armed doesn't somehow justify the shooting, which is what you're really trying to imply, even if you try to deny this.
No, it's you who are trying to deny horseshit the pleasure of seeing lefties killed in public.
He WASN'T armed when he was shot. This is clearly shown in the actual footage. He was disarmed, ergo not armed. Then they shot him. And yet again his initially being armed doesn't somehow justify the shooting, which is what you're really trying to imply, even if you try to deny this.
I'm not trying to imply that at all. He never should have been shot.
Do you think he's shot if he was never carrying a gun?
He WASN'T armed when he was shot. This is clearly shown in the actual footage. He was disarmed, ergo not armed. Then they shot him. And yet again his initially being armed doesn't somehow justify the shooting, which is what you're really trying to imply, even if you try to deny this.
The reality is if he doesn't bring the gun to protest he would not have been shot and the officers that shot him should be charged and chances are you will not get 12 jurors to agree
I'm not trying to imply that at all. He never should have been shot.
Do you think he's shot if he was never carrying a gun?
You ****ing well are trying to imply that, you would never have mentioned it otherwise, as if it somehow means something when it doesn't.
What's your excuse for Renee Good who had no gun? Lemme guess, she shoulda complied? Used the care as a weapon or whatever other bullshit you'll spew next?
The reality is if he doesn't bring the gun to protest he would not have been shot and the officers that shot him should be charged and chances are you will not get 12 jurors to agree
Oh look moar bullshit. He wasn't armed when he was shot, for the umpteenth time. The excuses been made here are pathetic.
The reality is if he doesn't bring the gun to protest he would not have been shot and the officers that shot him should be charged and chances are you will not get 12 jurors to agree
You can't say this because they will jump around in circles and argue with you for no reason.
It was legal for him to carry the gun!!!!!
It was holstered!!!!!
They disarmed him!!!!!
You magas support Rittenhouse!!!
2A!!!!!
I'm not trying to imply that at all. He never should have been shot.
Do you think he's shot if he was never carrying a gun?
Probably not. But please don't pretend like this is anything other than victim blaming. We've heard this line before in a million different contexts:
"She probably wouldn't have been raped if she hadn't been blind drunk."
"She probably wouldn't have been murdered if she hadn't been working as a prostitute."
"He probably wouldn't have gotten robbed if he hadn't been flashing that fancy watch in a rough neighborhood."
"Granddad probably wouldn't have gotten scammed if he had just called the bank."
Depending on the situation, these sorts of statements often are true, at least to some degree. But the person making the statement almost always is transparently attempting to focus responsibility on the victim in order to deflect attention from the party that is actually morally culpable. And very often, the person making the statement is also belittling the idea that there is a broader issue that needs to be addressed.
You ****ing well are trying to imply that, you would never have mentioned it otherwise, as if it somehow means something when it doesn't.
What's your excuse for Renee Good who had no gun? Lemme guess, she shoulda complied? Used the care as a weapon or whatever other bullshit you'll spew next?
You guys are really funny. I don't know why this is an argument.
It's a simple f'n point.
If you have a gun on you, bad things are more likely to happen.
If you disagee with that point, you must think that if you have a gun on you, good things are more likely to happen.
Which in that case you should be actively supporting everyone being armed.
Who knows. Probably not. But please don't pretend like this is anything other than victim blaming. We've heard this line before in a million different contexts:"She probably wouldn't have been raped if she hadn't been blind drunk.""She probably wouldn't have been murdered if she hadn't been working as a prostitute.""He probably wouldn't have gotten robbed if he hadn't been f
Ya those statements are probably all true as well.
You guys are really funny. I don't know why this is an argument.
It's a simple f'n point.
If you have a gun on you, bad things are more likely to happen.
If you disagee with that point, you must think that if you have a gun on you, good things are more likely to happen.
Which in that case you should be actively supporting everyone being armed.
They may well have shot him even if he was initially unarmed like they shot Renee Good, maybe they'd mistake his phone for a gun. If you have a phone on you, bad things are more likely to happen after all...
