[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.

If you still

01 August 2024 at 05:08 PM
Reply...

6212 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

So every single question DFMC asked was answered. Shall we compile a list of the dodged questions for him?

Remember when he called someone else a misogynist name for not answering questions?


by Gorgonian

Remember when he called someone else a misogynist name for not answering questions?

No, what happened there?




by Didace

Where does one find "experienced hijackers"? Is there a web site?

Hijackers R Us dot org


by Deuces McKracken

That's never been said or implied in any way whatsoever. I don't judge people like that like I think you do. I've given my reasons I think the alleged hijackers would have to have been extremely lucky to have pulled off what they did-

The hijackers had about a 50% success rate: they hit two buildings, barely hit the pentagon, lost the plane to passengers in PA and didn’t get the plane out of Boston.


by Gorgonian

So every single question DFMC asked was answered. Shall we compile a list of the dodged questions for him?

Remember when he called someone else a misogynist name for not answering questions?

If I'm such a crazy conspiracy theorist why resort to making up lies about me? I don't remember calling anyone a misogynist but if I did it wouldn't be for not answering questions that doesn't make sense on its own.

I'm not going to be doing a ton of "work" just because d2 writes a sentence when it's something I've written 20 posts on previously. You are free to dig up old posts and refute them. But every time I go back and read the old exchanges I see myself kicking your asses.


by Deuces McKracken

If I'm such a crazy conspiracy theorist why resort to making up lies about me? I don't remember calling anyone a misogynist but if I did it wouldn't be for not answering questions that doesn't make sense on its own.I'm not going to be doing a ton of "work" just because d2 writes a sentence when it's something I've written 20 posts on previously. You are free to dig up old posts

I said a misogynist name, not a misogynist you illiterate jackwad.

And here is where you did that.


You called him a misogynist name for not answering a question. HMMM.

And I have asked you several direct questions in the form of SUPPORTING YOUR OWN POSITIVE CLAIMS. You not only didn't answer them, you DIDN'T EVEN UNDERSTAND IT HAPPENED.

You really should look back on all this time you've invested on this lost cause that does nothing but embarrass you, dude.


by jjjou812

The hijackers had about a 50% success rate: they hit two buildings, barely hit the pentagon, lost the plane to passengers in PA and didn’t get the plane out of Boston.

Yeah if I played the lottery 5 times and won 3 I guess I suck at the lottery. I'm sure the people who collectively got trillions of dollars when their plane sized tickets punched in were in total shambles at their sorry success rate.

In all honesty though, they were probably sweating building 7 a little. Their reaction was probably something like "man they are more helpless than we even imagined". They use your pathetic cowardice and helplessness to justify what they do to you. Sometimes I can see their point of view. It's like you, someone who believes their obvious lies and never challenges them on anything as they squeeze every bit of labor out of you and poison the planet and threaten the human race with nuclear holocaust, it's almost like you are as craven and callous as them but only lack their guile and guts.


by Deuces McKracken

Sometimes I can see their point of view. It's like you, someone who believes their obvious lies and never challenges them on anything as they squeeze every bit of labor out of you and poison the planet and threaten the human race with nuclear holocaust, it's almost like you are as craven and callous as them but only lack their guile and guts.

If I were a pinheaded that went around making **** up all the time in an effort to show how smart I was, maybe your criticisms would be justified. In this sense, you are a lot like Victor. You are a joke here. Your ramblings are amusing but have no significant effect on anyone. At best you get a “ha” every once is a while. Must people probably have you on ignore unless they are here making fun of you and your nonsense.

I will put up my credentials of fighting the government, attacking large corporations and helping people against your body of work any day of week.


by Deuces McKracken

I'm not going to be doing a ton of "work" just because d2 writes a sentence when it's something I've written 20 posts on previously.

Repeating the same tired bullshit 20 times doesn't make it any more correct. You just ignore criticisms and refutations, or at best dismiss them with "I don't find that compelling".

Yes, you have repeated the same idiocy 20 times over, but you never actually address valid criticisms of it. Anyone with half a brain can see what you are doing.

by Deuces McKracken

But every time I go back and read the old exchanges I see myself kicking your asses.

That is because your brain is broken. The only person who sees that is you.


by d2_e4

Well, that settles it then, some dipshit on the internet with no expertise whatsoever in this (or any) subject doesn't find it compelling. tHe sCiEnTiStS mUsT bE lYiNg!Oh, and I think you accidentally forgot about, you know, all the jet fuel. You know, the stuff they burn to propel those big heavy planes that crashed into the building. While I am not an expert, I somehow doubt

If by "tHe sCiEnTiStS" you mean NIST then they aren't really lying in the affirmative so much as by omission. They are just ignoring the phenomenon. If by "tHe sCiEnTiStS" you mean Gorgo then God help you. If there is someone else out there making these claims you reference then please cite them. But you don't have a reference. You just feel like there must be scientists explaining the molten steel and the sustained 2000 degree temps. But I've never come across them and I've actually looked (doesn't mean they aren't out there). Again, NIST ignored the molten steel.

I've heard this talk about generators and diesel fuel, but I don't recall jet fuel being named as the culprit for the ground zero heat blooms. Most of that was consumed in the massive fireballs on impact or scattered. If you think there are scientists out there trying to explain the molten steel, other than those you prejudicially label kooks who think it was unreacted thermite, cite them.

The molten steel is something of a smoking gun, and in the investigation of the 9/11 attacks the smoking gun is ignored by the forensics team. This is why the greatest advocates for a good faith investigation of the attacks are family members of those killed. You think it is perfectly fine to ignore the smoking gun because your people didn't die and so you don't care. Either that or you somehow think it was a beneficial event for you and you actively support the omissions of NIST and the 9/11 report. Yours is a pretty disgusting stance either way.


I just wanted to extract a bit from my last post because I wanted those who can't read too good to know this: your willingness to ignore the molten steel all over the 9/11 attacks is akin to ignoring the smoking gun of a murder scene and is a disgusting display of cravenness. You would never do that if your loved ones died in those buildings, and your lack of giving a **** about your countrymen is what allows those who benefit from the attacks to continue pursuing the projects which are so obviously dooming us.


by Deuces McKracken

I just wanted to extract a bit from my last post because I wanted those who can't read too good to know this: your willingness to ignore the molten steel all over the 9/11 attacks is akin to ignoring the smoking gun of a murder scene and is a disgusting display of cravenness. You would never do that if your loved ones died in those buildings, and your lack of giving a **** abou

Hey Deuces, did you ever explain why the Lizard People went for a plane + bomb attack instead of just a bomb attack?


by Deuces McKracken

If by "tHe sCiEnTiStS" you mean Gorgo then God help you.

Gorgo gave you an answer and you ignored his answer. So why exactly should I listen to you instead of him? What you said has been refuted and what he said hasn't. You are claiming that this stuff is unexplained, he explained it, and you ignored what he wrote and continued claiming it was unexplained in your usual dishonest manner.


by Deuces McKracken

In all honesty though, they were probably sweating building 7 a little.

It caught fire, the fire was uncontrollable, the structure failed and it fell down. Nobody died because the firemen had ordered everyone out.


by Deuces McKracken

molten steel

There wasn't any. Steel beams are going to fail a long time before they melt.


by Trolly McTrollson

Hey Deuces, did you ever explain why the Lizard People went for a plane + bomb attack instead of just a bomb attack

He is big on motive and disgust for ignoring extreme damage but short on logic and facts.


by Deuces McKracken

I
The molten steel is something of a smoking gun,

There's no molten steel dishpit.


by d2_e4

Gorgo gave you an answer and you ignored his answer. So why exactly should I listen to you instead of him? What you said has been refuted and what he said hasn't. You are claiming that this stuff is unexplained, he explained it, and you ignored what he wrote and continued claiming it was unexplained in your usual dishonest manner.

Pay attention to how he is harping on the molten steel now even though there is literally ZERO evidence of molten steel.

Zero.


by 57 On Red

There wasn't any. Steel beams are going to fail a long time before they melt.

There wasn't any except for the tons of it pouring out of the building pre collapse and the rivers of it observed and filmed at ground zero.

In fact, if we can't agree to the presence of molten steel then we don't need to discuss the topic because you're not being serious.


by Deuces McKracken

There wasn't any except for the tons of it pouring out of the building pre collapse and the rivers of it observed and filmed at ground zero.

In fact, if we can't agree to the presence of molten steel then we don't need to discuss the topic because you're not being serious.

Let's see, we have someone who is known to be a lying scumbag saying there is molten steel with no evidence, and a bunch of people who are not known to be lying scumbags saying there isn't. Whom to believe? It's a poser.


That was probably all aluminum, like those metal flows in Hawaii from the space lasers you proved existed.


by Deuces McKracken

There wasn't any except for the tons of it pouring out of the building pre collapse and the rivers of it observed and filmed at ground zero.

Do you have footage of this 'river' of molten steel?


by Deuces McKracken

Yeah if I played the lottery 5 times and won 3 I guess I suck at the lottery. I'm sure the people who collectively got trillions of dollars when their plane sized tickets punched in were in total shambles at their sorry success rate.In all honesty though, they were probably sweating building 7 a little. Their reaction was probably something like "man they are more helpless than

Didn't #7 go as good as it could though? If would look a bit more awkward if it just sat there unscathed and then fell.

The got it to at least burn and actually begin to fall for a split sec before detonating it. That was pretty lucky.


by Gorgonian

Pay attention to how he is harping on the molten steel now even though there is literally ZERO evidence of molten steel.

Zero.

There is video. There are eye witness descriptions from 100s of people. I'm done discussing this with you until you acknowledge there was molten steel. Nobody who has seen the evidence and denies it is being serious.

Reply...