President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
lol you tardos endlessly make up ****.
you say he's going to bomb greenland. he won't.
you say he's going to invade greenland by force. he won't.
so just keep believing everything. you probably still believe in santa too.
Well, he did all that to Venezuela, so exactly why do you think anyone is stupid for thinking he won't do it again?
Let's rewind for a second, tardo.
Trump, as well as many in his administration, says he's going to a acquire Greenland - by force, if necessary.
You say he's not and he's just working a deal. What's the deal?
To acquire Greenland
you're arguing with someone who last year didn't know that catholics lived in europe... he's european...
stop wasting your time
yes i think that's what this is really all about
Trump, as well as many in his administration, says he's going to a acquire Greenland - by force, if necessary.
You say he's not and he's just working a deal. What's the deal?
I'm sure that Trump's plan is the use the threat of force to coerce Greenland/Denmark into accepting some sort of deal. What is he prepared to do if there is no deal to be had? That is anybody's guess. It probably depends on how strongly the rest of Europe resists. If Trump thought that taking Greenland by force would start a war with NATO allies, then I'm 99% sure he wouldn't do it. Would he do it if he suspected that Western Europe would do nothing more than complain loudly, impose economic sanctions, and declare NATO effectively dead? Probably not, but it is hard to be sure. Trump thinks he is great at this sort of brinkmanship, and he certainly doesn't seem to care about NATO.
The whole thing is revolting.
For what reason? It's certainly not for the reason (national security) he states it's for.
Oh... when has he invaded another country under a pretext?
Don't worry - Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico are far ahead of Canada.
you're arguing with someone who last year didn't know that catholics lived in europe... he's european...
stop wasting your time
LOL. Is that true?
I'm sure that Trump's plan is the use the threat of force to coerce Greenland/Denmark into accepting some sort of deal. What is he prepared to do if there is no deal to be had? That is anybody's guess. It probably depends on how strongly the rest of Europe resists. If Trump thought that taking Greenland by force would start a war with NATO allies, then I'm 99% sure he would
I agree with this. The highlight of your post is it needs to be taken seriously, otherwise he will think there are no ramifications to doing it and who knows where that would lead, yet people like nuthouse think no one should sit up and take notice when Trump says the insane things that he says.
I'm sure that Trump's plan is the use the threat of force to coerce Greenland/Denmark into accepting some sort of deal. What is he prepared to do if there is no deal to be had? That is anybody's guess. It probably depends on how strongly the rest of Europe resists. If Trump thought that taking Greenland by force would start a war with NATO allies, then I'm 99% sure he would
I agree with this too. aka 'the art of the deal'
he is posturing force in efforts to get a deal done.
he's not actually going to use force. there's where the disagreement is. LOL and others think he's gonig to bomb and invade greenland, canada, cuba, panama, colombia, mexico....
I agree with this too. aka 'the art of the deal'
he is posturing force in efforts to get a deal done.
he's not actually going to use force. there's where the disagreement is. LOL and others think he's gonig to bomb and invade greenland, canada, cuba, panama, colombia, mexico....
Once again, please explain why he wouldn't when he did EXACTLY that to venezuela?
I agree with this too. aka 'the art of the deal'
he is posturing force in efforts to get a deal done.
he's not actually going to use force. there's where the disagreement is. LOL and others think he's gonig to bomb and invade greenland, canada, cuba, panama, colombia, mexico....
"He's not actually going to impose tariffs."
Because Maduro was a bad guy with a $50 million arrest warrant. what's he going to do, march into Greenland and caputre Jens-Frederik Nielsen?
HE LIED ABOUT THE NICOLE GOOD
I agree with this too. aka 'the art of the deal'
he is posturing force in efforts to get a deal done.
he's not actually going to use force. there's where the disagreement is. LOL and others think he's gonig to bomb and invade greenland, canada, cuba, panama, colombia, mexico....
He's an imperialist. Why shouldn't anyone sit up and take notice when he says he wants to bomb Mexico? How many other countries does he need to bomb before you accept that Greenland is on the table?
Also, what deal? What's the deal he needs with Greenland?? To acquire the country for what purpose?
He's an imperialist. Why shouldn't anyone sit up and take notice when he says he wants to bomb Mexico? How many other countries does he need to bomb before you accept that Greenland is on the table?
Also, what deal? What's the deal he needs with Greenland?? To acquire the country for what purpose?
ya take notice all you want. i don't equate greenland and mexico with bombing in Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Somalia, Yemen, and Libya. basically every president since ww2 has bombed countries in the middle east to some capacity.
The deal to acquire Alaska was a pretty good one imo.
Easy game
Except neither side ever really cared about the victims. It was never anything more than political performance and leverage to them.
I agree with this too. aka 'the art of the deal'
he is posturing force in efforts to get a deal done.
he's not actually going to use force. there's where the disagreement is. LOL and others think he's gonig to bomb and invade greenland, canada, cuba, panama, colombia, mexico....
This is a real fundamental disagreement between people like you and people like me. I think that it is terrible at a macro level for the U.S. to threaten to use force to achieve a deal to acquire Greenland, even if you would never actually do it. You think it is fine.
As for Columbia, Mexico, Cuba, etc., I very easily could imagine military action. In fact, I would say military strikes against the cartels in Mexico is more likely than not.
Housenuts is about 0 for 500 on any point he makes holding and he never updates or adapts. Not sure how fruitful arguing anything with him will ever turn out to be
This is a real fundamental disagreement between people like you and people like me. I think that it is terrible at a macro level for the U.S. to threaten to use force to achieve a deal to acquire Greenland, even if you would never actually do it. You think it is fine. As for Columbia, Mexico, Cuba, etc., I very easily could imagine military action. In fact, I would say mili
I agree that I don't think it's a great look, but it doesn't overly concern me. I do not think force will be used and that's ultimately what matters. My main responses are to the people crying and saying omg he's going to bomb canada, greenland and mexico. No he's not, chill out.
Cries for help would be taken more seriously if people cried less.
Cartel strikes in Mexico are possible I guess. Do you think that happens with Mexican government blessing, or done unilaterally? Seems today the Mexican President said she wouldn't allow the US to conduct such strikes, so I guess I'm in the camp of it not happening unless there's blessing.
Nothing concerns you unless it directly affects you. It's called ASPD. You can look it up.
Housenuts is about 0 for 500 on any point he makes holding and he never updates or adapts. Not sure how fruitful arguing anything with him will ever turn out to be
it's difficult to prove a negative.
you guys cry endlessly that stuff is going to happen and for me to be right i need to wait until the end of trump's presidency because it's still possible it might happen.
- midterms are going to be cancelled
- bombing greenland
- invading canada
- trump running it back in 2028
we'll just have to wait and see!
Cartel strikes in Mexico are possible I guess. Do you think that happens with Mexican government blessing, or done unilaterally? Seems today the Mexican President said she wouldn't allow the US to permit such strikes, so I guess I'm in the camp of it not happening unless there's blessing.
I can't see the Mexican government ever publicly blessing such a thing. Private blessing and public denial is a possibility, but a remote one imo, mainly because I'm sure Sheinbaum would never trust Trump to keep a private blessing under wraps. I definitely think it could happen without the Mexican government's blessing.
swing and a miss.
still waiting for martial law too.
