President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
The crypto stuff alone is insane levels of shadiness.
Most people don't put their entire net worth on the S&P either
Assuming he started with 200MM back in 1982 (no idea the exact value, trying to estimate it from the graph), if he invested that in the S&P 500 in the last trading session of 1982, and not including dividends (maybe he used them for living expenses), he would have about 9.4B now. No shady crypto dealings, no going busto in the 90s, no work basically. Being already rich and having the foresight to notice how stocks were cheap and all the positive catalysts moving forward, even I would have seen that lol.
Maybe someone as rich as him, assuming he was already well connected, would also have heard about Warren Buffett already and know about Berkshire Hathaway in 1982.
*not saying that putting everything in the S&P 500 is necessarily a good idea, especially if you are not a multimillionaire already, especially if you're not coming from a recession and very high nominal interest rates and the P/E of the market is not at single digits as it was in the early 80s.
**Also assuming low cost ETFs were already a thing in 1982, no idea really.
well most normal people have a lot of their net worth in their owner occupied house equity sure.
but that went really well as well in the last decades.
what isn't in your house should be 80-20 sp500/bonds (according to buffet) and although bonds did horribly in the last few years, they did pretty well in the last decades.
you can sprinkle some gold and alternative assets here and there if you want to get fancy but a rational person should be mainly in equities (outside his house).
maybe not many people are rational sure.
Today a statue appeared on the mall, in honor of National Friendship Month, picturing those well-known best friends, Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.
The words of fraternal love from Epstein's 50th birthday are engraved on the plaque.
hmm, starting to think that these nazis are nazis
Luciom, does it mean anything to you that Miller is making speeches plagiarizing Goebbels? Doesn't that make you think that the Nazi comparisons may be valid?
Luciom, does it mean anything to you that Miller is making speeches plagiarizing Goebbels? Doesn't that make you think that the Nazi comparisons may be valid?
I am not going to watch a video by a radical leftist marxist about anything.
that guy is the living embodiment of everything that is wrong in politics basically, and far worse than even actual Nazis could ever be.
he is the actual evil incarnate, radical Marxist antisemite pro Muslim terror, he hits all the boxes.
so my heuristics lead me to think that if he intends to push a claim, the claim is almost certainly false just because he is making it, given he is, again, the embodiment of the worst kind of human being a person could make up//
now purely hypothetically, given Goebbels was an exceptional propaganda writer, it wouldn't be surprised if people looking to write good propaganda studied his methods.
and that wouldn't make someone a nazi, same as being in favor of having highways doesn't make you a nazi even if the concept was essentially invented by them with the Autobahns
I am not going to watch a video by a radical leftist marxist about anything.that guy is the living embodiment of everything that is wrong in politics basically, and far worse than even actual Nazis could ever be. he is the actual evil incarnate, radical Marxist antisemite pro Muslim terror, he hits all the boxes.so my heuristics lead me to think that if he intends to push a cla
Do you actually know anything about that guy? After you talked about NPR being the most biased news source around, I asked you how you know that and how much NPR you have every listened to. You conveniently neglected to answer that question
Anyway though, I don't know anything about that guy myself, but I didn't tell you to watch him
How about you watch the video of Miller at the CK memorial, and see how it compares for yourself?
The comparison with Goebbels was brought up here very soon after the speech was given. It's not the hallucination of one guy.
And it's about the content, not the methods. Although even trying to follow the methods of the Nazis is pretty despicable and telling, IMO.
Do you actually know anything about that guy? After you talked about NPR being the most biased news source around, I asked you how you know that and how much NPR you have every listened to. You conveniently neglected to answer that questionAnyway though, I don't know anything about that guy myself, but I didn't tell you to watch him How about you watch the video of Miller at t
I don't watch his videos but he is an important part of many Twitter conversations (always with the worst possible take you can imagine from my side on every single topic), so yes I know that guy pretty well content wise.
he is Victor level of being pro Hamas to be clear, that alone completely disqualifies him forever. and the fact 72o linked him should be a tell.
same for NPR I never listened to anything, I just read the disastrously biased articles during COVID and the inane fact checking always biased toward the most radical leftist position possible.
I don't consume audio or visual content for information, I want written form.
Ok, well I guess you can look for a transcript if you want to, but the primary sources are both speeches, so audio is the most direct way to compare.
Yeah was obviously talking about 2025 and the very obvious and blatant insider trading being done by the president of the United States.
That he is an awful businessman and his returns pre-2025 weren’t impressive we agree on.
Yeah was obviously talking about 2025 and the very obvious and blatant insider trading being done by the president of the United States.
That he is an awful businessman and his returns pre-2025 weren’t impressive we agree on.
i don't know if bribes/insider trading are included there tbh.
I think it's mostly truth social and the legal, transparent crypto activities. he might have made much more than that with completely untraceable bribes/kickbacks in crypto
Lucy’s posts can basically be distilled into 5 generic themes:
1. Dems are bad
2. Dems are evil
3. The government has a moral responsibility to destroy (metaphorically and/or literally) any liberal
4. Bad faith trolling
5. ‘Wait you think I’m a fascist?’
I’m glad the facade has been dropped and he’s just revealing and embracing the unholy piece of **** he is
I’m disappointed he still drives the bus in every thread and you all allow it
Lucy’s posts can basically be distilled into 5 generic themes:1. Dems are bad2. Dems are evil3. The government has a moral responsibility to destroy (metaphorically and/or literally) any liberal4. Bad faith trolling5. ‘Wait you think I’m a fascist?’I’m glad the facade has been dropped and he’s just revealing and embracing the unholy piece of **** he isI’m disappointed he still
you are writing this after I just posted about how bad Trump was at managing his wealth.
you also conveniently forget the massive criticism of trump tariffs I often wrote about as well as the defense of Israel (and of pro Israel democrats).
but I mean never let facts interrupt your narrative I guess
just the ~80 posts today over like 16 hours, another day wasted pathetically. gods i hope you're lying about having children jfc
Its pretty awesome that Trump is just so batshit insane that his dumpster fire of a speech today basically got ~12 stream of consciousness posts and is generally unnoteworthy otherwise
I don't watch his videos but he is an important part of many Twitter conversations (always with the worst possible take you can imagine from my side on every single topic), so yes I know that guy pretty well content wise.he is Victor level of being pro Hamas to be clear, that alone completely disqualifies him forever. and the fact 72o linked him should be a tell.same for NPR I
false. hes much closer to a liberal Zionist and he spends an absurd amount of time platforming Israelis who do the whole "not in my name" song and dance. also, hes clearly trying to make in-roads as a Democrat party operative given that he was actually given a prime media spot at the DNC and his interviews with GenocideBernie and AOCIA.
just the ~80 posts today over like 16 hours, another day wasted pathetically. gods i hope you're lying about having children jfc
While I think Lucy is such a loser abomination waste of life that no woman would ever allow his seed to arrive at term if he ever got to make the sex with a she person, I think the only thing about Lucy that amuses me is the concept of how much his hypothetical children would ****ing despise him and make him so ****ing bitter he spends his life on the Internet doing this
As far as my worldview goes, Lucy is 1 of 2 things:
1. An incel who will never get it in
2. A literal father whose child(ren) ****ing despise him
In either scenario I smirk cuz in either scenario Lucito deserves his misery and it makes me happy he will never be happy
I almost hope Lucy is a dad cuz it would make his Internet life that much more pathetic and would allow me to revel in what a useless piece of **** this clown is to his offspring much less humanity at large
false. hes much closer to a liberal Zionist and he spends an absurd amount of time platforming Israelis who do the whole "not in my name" song and dance. also, hes clearly trying to make in-roads as a Democrat party operative given that he was actually given a prime media spot at the DNC and his interviews with GenocideBernie and AOCIA.
lmao this is such a great illustration about how the left always tears down their own. not that I mind you attacking Hasan, and I think I agree with the general criticism of Hasan as a cloutchaser hating on Dems while trying to leach on them.
omg please please please, for the love of the Fonz, can everyone stop responding to Luciom

