In other news

Nazi or Racism card

Odd that the "racism card" was played here by the fanatical goose-stepping 50 posts per day far right shill:

Thank you!

Always glad to be of service!

Probably the only type of service you've ever given.

And several other cards as well, some of which will earn me a permaban just for mentioning them.

On a somewhat related point, did you ever figure out that Pat Buchanan and Pat Robertson are not the same person?

(If you're still working on it, I understand.)

I posted an objective example of anti white racism. Instead of either glossing over or accepting that yes, it's racist to indicate the perpetrator is white when he is, while hiding it's black when he is black, you commented on the source of the screenshots (!!!!).

Because you cannot admit objective failure on your side, and you can't let objective proof of racism on your side stay unchallenged.

Because you do defend anti white racism and think is a good thing

Reminds me of an old axiom for defense attorneys:

"When your client is guilty, abuse the plaintiff."

here it's more like let's abuse who took the photos of your client being caught in the act

I think it was just a couple years ago that some Very Serious People (Trademark Pending) concluded that all white folk are racist.

That being the case, these repetitious accusations of racism just need to be filed under "Pot...Kettle." (Ironically)

No. It was mostly just a dumb point by you. You obviously should expect to see the race of the police officers discussed in a Wikipedia article about the killing of George Floyd. The killing was inextricably tied to a social movement related to the treatment of black people by the police and the officers eventually were convicted of civil rights violations.

The race of the victim and the perpetrator was less obviously relevant in the case of the woman in Charlotte.

If you look up the Wikipedia article about Colin Ferguson's murder of several people on the Long Island Railroad, you will find a picture of him (he is Jamaican-American) and a detailed discussion of his hatred of white people and the jury's rejection of his "black rage" defense. In other words, race features prominently in the Wikipedia article because race was highly relevant to the the murders that he committed.

why the bold? black police officers routinely mistreat black offenders in custody as well.

That BLM chose to use the racist angle is true, but the same identical thing is true for the heinous murder of the ukrainian refugee: the right is choosing to highlight the racial angle.

No difference from floyd.

Except shopkeepers don't need to barricade to avoid destruction when it's the right that complains, and cities won't burn, that is.

/

Btw for the colin ferguson murder i don't see the ethnicity of the assassin highlighted at the very beginning, unlike for the floyd murder

/

On December 7, 1993, a mass shooting occurred aboard a Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) train in Garden City Park, New York, United States. As the train arrived at the Merillon Avenue station, passenger Colin Ferguson began firing at other passengers with a semi-automatic pistol. Six of the victims were killed and 19 others were wounded before Ferguson was tackled and held down by other passengers on the train.[1]

Ferguson's trial was noted for some unusual developments, including him dismissing his defense counsel, insisting on representing himself and questioning his victims on the stand. He was convicted in February 1995 on six counts of murder and 19 counts of attempted murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment. He is currently incarcerated at Mid-State Correctional Facility, with an earliest possible release date of August 6, 2309.[2]

/

AND YOU ****ING HAVE TO SCROLL DOWN TO SEE HIS FACE, they have the location as the main photo roflmao

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Islan...

And *in the description of the perpetrator the word black is not used* omg

Thanks for pointing me to yet another blatant example of anti white racism

Yeah. If I read that article, I would have absolutely no idea what his race/ethnicity was. Give me a ****ing break.

You know VERY well that the vast majority of people who open an article (who are already a small minority) don't go past the very first few lines of the article.

You know that VERY well which is why it is absolutely fundamental in all publishing to choose titles, and the first snippet of info provided, as that's what will be consumed by 90-95% of the people who happen to see your published article.

Choosing what to highlight, what to make salient, in titles and in the first few lines of an article is an explicit, fundamental editorial choice.

And it's a vile, racist one against whites if systematically, perpetrators of horrendous acts are depicted as whites immediatly when they are, and aren't depicted as members of other ethnicities when they aren't.

Compare your anti-white attack on the train with the article on the anti-black massacre in Charleston

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston...

An anti-black mass shooting and hate crime occurred on June 17, 2015, in Charleston, South Carolina. Nine people were killed during a Bible study at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, the oldest black church in the Southern United States.[1] Among the fatalities was the senior pastor, state senator Clementa C. Pinckney. All nine victims were African Americans.[2] At the time, it was one of the deadliest mass shootings at a place of worship in U.S. history, tied with the Waddell Buddhist temple shooting. Both incidents were surpassed by the Sutherland Springs church shooting in 2017.

Dylann Roof, a 21-year-old white supremacist, had attended the Bible study before opening fire

/

Why isn't Colin Ferguson, a black suprematist who had previously called for a "black revolution" who was suspended from college for anti white racism *and violent threats*, not described IMMEDIATLY in the article as such?

Hey Luciom, shut the **** up

You sound like a whiny little bitch

"White people are treated so unfairly under this white nationalist administration"

In the box at the beginning of the article, Ferguson's motive is explicitly listed as "anti-white racism".

But keep getting outraged at whatever they tell you to get outraged about. I guess it was user-edited Wikipedia articles this time. I wonder what it will be next time.

The guy needs to either move to the US or forever hold his peace.

This is so ****ing funny

It's clear that in the first case, race may have been a factor in the original killing, and it certainly was in the protests which were huge news.

I've never heard of the second person, so it's likely not newsworthy in any way, and the race of the perpetrator was likely not particularly relevant to the crime.

Conservatives think it’s relevant because black crime or something

The crime had nothing to with race with George Floyd . It was an officer that went to far and poor training . That could have been a white person drugged up committing a crime and chances are treated the same way

We don’t know what was in the mind of the cop or the felon

Soft on crime policies by the left are responsible for the Ukrainian gals death .

In other news, Charlie Kirk was just shot.

I was in a meeting and my mentors son was texting him about Charlie Kirk