In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
If you have compelling evidence to the contrary not sure why you think that would be ban worthy
If all you have is a 14 line jumble of nonsense then yeah maybe keep it to yourself on this one
If you have compelling evidence to the contrary not sure why you think that would be ban worthy
If all you have is a 14 line jumble of nonsense then yeah maybe keep it to yourself on this one
I risk a ban if i attempt to discuss why it's relevant if he was trans or not, because we have to open the can of worm of mental illness and so on.
For now i only saw several sources claiming he changed his name from Robert to Robin and was trans (MtF) but i don't have a final confirmation on that.
But the subject of "what if he was trans", is hard to discuss without risking a ban here. Which is ok this is your place so you decide the rules.
Anyway can we all agree that "6 millions wasn't enough" is bad, and pro pal and pro hamas people bear a lot of responsibility for that?
On the sunnier side of things, I really don't think a civil war, in really any regard, is going to happen. The overwhelming majority of people aren't us. The don't follow politics, they work, wait for their paycheck and splurge and hope to do the wife or the girlfriend thing. The rest are the olds who just want to look at nostalgic AI FB posts and reminisce their last days w
I don't think a civil war will happen either but mostly because the best case scenario for civil war is the military fracturing and potentially10s of millions of people die
The worst case scenario is the military doesn't fracture and god knows what happens (probably to democrats)
What I think is most likely is we just continue to goose step off a cliff beyond a point of no return. I mean, I don't think there is any way we ever return to a sense of "normalcy" that the US enjoyed before ~2014. We've seen this play out in near 3rd world **** holes but never in a country with a whole lot to lose. I hope I'm wrong and that "whole lot to lose" part kicking us into survival mode at some point but we've seen this play out a couple of times before and while you would think a country of our size and power would put up a fight we are actually speed running the process.
I risk a ban if i attempt to discuss why it's relevant if he was trans or not, because we have to open the can of worm of mental illness and so on.For now i only saw several sources claiming he changed his name from Robert to Robin and was trans (MtF) but i don't have a final confirmation on that.But the subject of "what if he was trans", is hard to discuss without risking a ba
6 million wasn't enough isn't a new pro Palestinian rally cry, its an old neo nazi rally cry
6MWE was visible on a number of January 6ers
Like it matters at all if one particular shooting is a trans person. Are they offing a high rate of people or something?
Edit: it does matter for trans people and that is a problem. But there is a good chance that it will all.be forgotten by tuesday once the next shooting happens or whem Weight Watchers changes their name to the pudge patrol or some ****.
Edit again: i thought i edited not quoted
Anyway can we all agree that "6 millions wasn't enough" is bad, and pro pal and pro hamas people bear a lot of responsibility for that?
For the Holocaust? I'd say fascist dipshits like your grandpa were mostly responsible for that.
A number of places track statistics
if its 90% or 97% it doesn't really matter to me
If we DID have one, though, my money is on the side with all the guns. So, checkmate to the libtards on that one, unfortunately.
I kinda doubt it either. But I think you're under-estimating how many lefties are armed and over-estimating how many fat&old righties would be anything other than a supply cache point 😀
Rockefeller institute of government says 54% white since 1966 in the USA
https://rockinst.org/gun-violence/mass-s....
That's lower than the % of adults being white on avg frm 1966 to today btw. So non whites were the perpetrators more often than they should have been proportionally in society in mass shootings in the USA. You claimed whites did almost all the mass shootings.
So it does actually matter to me if you , for some reason, are convinced of a widely absurd and objectively false data point about a crucial statistics of american crime.
The same number of people showed up to Jan 6th as participated in CHAZ. There's a small subset of weirdos on both sides who need more productive hobbies. That doesn't mean we're going to have a civil war.
If we DID have one, though, my money is on the side with all the guns. So, checkmate to the libtards on that one, unfortunately.
I'd take all the scientists and technical people over gun toting Cletuses with no education. And Lol at comparing Jan 6 to liberal extremism. It was solely caused by the president who still holds the view that those morons did nothing wrong. The cultures are not at all equivalent unless you're in a very low IQ/education bubble.
Rockefeller institute of government says 54% white since 1966 in the USAhttps://rockinst.org/gun-violence/mass-s....That's lower than the % of adults being white on avg frm 1966 to today btw. So non whites were the perpetra
Claiming there have been 504 mass shootings since 1966 is nasty work
Maybe I shouldn't have said white, which might be as low as 70% but cis male is very likely >95%
Claiming there have been 504 mass shootings since 1966 is nasty work
Maybe I shouldn't have said white, which might be as low as 70% but cis male is very likely >95%
they define it very precisely but if you have a different source pls link. you said 97% white which was an exceptionally racist claim given the reality is very different.
almost all violence is committed by men in society so it would surprise no one if 95%+ of the perps were men.
as for the "cis", actual trans people are an exceptionally small fraction of the population (far far less than 1%) so even if 1% of the mass shooting is by trans people that would already be disastrously disproportionate (no polls with people claiming they are non binary don't count).
actual trans people: people living for years as members of the opposite gender.
notice how the trans people who commit mass murder are all MtF, biology doesn't change with self identification
they define it very precisely but if you have a different source pls link. you said 97% white which was an exceptionally racist claim given the reality is very different.almost all violence is committed by men in society so it would surprise no one if 95%+ of the perps were men.as for the "cis", actual trans people are an exceptionally small fraction of the population (far far
Hilariously I had just read a report from the secret service that found in 173 attacks "3 were trans, assigned female at birth" lol
https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/defa...
The most extensive database is gunviolencearchive and they say 5 of 4400 shootings were trans people (through 2023)
Hilariously I had just read a report from the secret service that found in 173 attacks "3 were trans, assigned female at birth" lol
https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/defa...
The most extensive database is gunviolencearchive and they say 5 of 4400 shootings were trans people (through 2023)
how many of them white?
this SS link from 2016 to 2020 claims 47% whites non Hispanic.
care to admit you had no idea how much non whites were the perps in mass shooting, disproportionately so compared to their share of the adult population?
as for the "cis", actual trans people are an exceptionally small fraction of the population (far far less than 1%) so even if 1% of the mass shooting is by trans people that would already be disastrously disproportionate (no polls with people claiming they are non binary don't count).
What if white males (29% of the US population) represent >60% of the mass shootings?
1) have to check with the adult population not the 0-100
2) we already established it's all men, uncontroversial, have to compare with men of other races
3) whites were more as a % of the population years ago so if the database goes back enough in time (like that I linked from 1966) then the reference is the weighted average of the white % not the current white %
even with all this 60% with whites being 60% would be expected, and very very very different from the "90 or 97" you outrageously claimed
1) have to check with the adult population not the 0-1002) we already established it's all men, uncontroversial, have to compare with men of other races3) whites were more as a % of the population years ago so if the database goes back enough in time (like that I linked from 1966) then the reference is the weighted average of the white % not the current white %even with all thi
I'm not sure what your angle is here. Is it bad to commit mass shootings or not?
If .7% of the population is trans and "even 1%" of mass shootings being trans is a disastrous disproportion then what does it mean that 60-75% of mass shootings are white males?
I'm not sure what your angle is here. Is it bad to commit mass shootings or not?
If .7% of the population is trans and "even 1%" of mass shootings being trans is a disastrous disproportion then what does it mean that 60-75% of mass shootings are white males?
are you real? whites aren't the perps of mass shootings more than their proportion in the adult population.
again I linked 54% from 1966 to 2023 with whites on avg being almost 80% of adults on that timeframe.
you linked 47% from 2016 to 2020.
link the 60-75% (what kind of a range is that?) and the time frame and we check how many adults were white in the time frame
are you real? whites aren't the perps of mass shootings more than their proportion in the adult population.
again I linked 54% from 1966 to 2023 with whites on avg being almost 80% of adults on that timeframe.
you linked 47% from 2016 to 2020.
link the 60-75% (what kind of a range is that?) and the time frame and we check how many adults were white in the time frame
There is a shocking lack of data on mass shootings by race and all the data is conflicting even among similar methodologies. One might conspire that the gun lobby in the US doesn't want this data out there in a coherent fashion
https://www.statista.com/statistics/4764...
There is 60% for ya
Since the 24th there have been at least 5 shootings involving >3 victims and we know the race of one of them. That seems to be how it goes
Since the 24th there have been at least 5 shootings involving >3 victims and we know the race of one of them. That seems to be how it goes
Most of the black on black mass shootings (which are the majority of mass shootings) are personal (gang or other beefs); which most people recognize aren't the same thing as trans extremists, or other mostly left-wing extremists, shooting up Christian kids as an act of terrorism.
