President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
Some fun facts before Trump gets his latest performance review from Putin in Alaska tmw.
Trump and Putin have officially met or had calls 24 times while Trump has been office, and there's 7 additional claimed calls in between time he was in office by Bob Woodward. Of those 24 meetings, ZERO were officially recorded and entered into WH archives. WH archival is typically a standard process for historical purposes, and world leaders meeting are rarely not recorded and transcribed.
The next highest amount of meetings + calls Trump has had was w/ world leaders is w/ Macron - 9, followed by Xi Jinping 5. Several others at 4-1.
Of all his meetings and calls w/ other world leaders, exactly ZERO went undocumented and recorded into official WH historical archives.
It’s not all fabrication. But, you (and certain media outlets) are disingenuously highlighting the most violent aspects of protests that have been generally peaceful.
The only thing you reveal with these claims, is the type of news sources through which you choose to view the world.
You don’t live here, Luciom. You do not have any perspective from the ground level.
You don't need to live in a place to know that, if a reporter from a media company claims protests are "mostly peaceful" *while buildings are burning behind him*, you know that's a lie.
Also, there are national stat data from *insurance companies*.
Those were the most damaging riots *in recorded human history* on the insurance side
https://www.axios.com/2020/09/16/riots-c...
Depending on exact estimates they might come second to other black violence riots in the 90s (as per link), but that's about it.
And this time even if the label was "BLM", keep in mind the violent part was done mostly by antifa whites.Fenuine normal supporters lof the cause du jour (blacks or otherwise) led the actually peaceful protests by day.
At night, the marxist enemies of the state burnt down the cities. Almost all of them whites as we know from the arrests.
Now i understand axios is "capitalist" so it's not an ok source for you, but it's a centrist one. A very vanilla, almost apolitical one. Do you contest those insurance data as reported by axios? or do you think the riots that did the mos tdamage among ALL in insurance history (in 2020 , inflation adjusted values mind), were "mostly peaceful"? what definition is that? they objectively were the worst (or second worst) riots in recorded history in the USA since insurance exists, for property.
And remember that violence against property is violence for normal people, and it's not qualitatively different than mass assassination when the scale is in the billions. That's identical to murdering hundreds of people in cold blood at current insurance value of life.
Things that make you go "hmmmm"....
do you know the guy in charge of the statistics for 2024 is under investigation for manipulating them massively?
No, I wasn't. Is it a legit valid investigation or a witch hunt like poor President Trump was subjected to by Crooked Joe Biden and the woke media?
Some fun facts before Trump gets his latest performance review from Putin in Alaska tmw.Trump and Putin have officially met or had calls 24 times while Trump has been office, and there's 7 additional claimed calls in between time he was in office by Bob Woodward. Of those 24 meetings, ZERO were officially recorded and entered into WH archives. WH archival is typically a standar
libs are playing all the hits. well, really just the only hit.
I mean I get it, Trump is tremendously easy to criticize given hes a fascist rapist, but Dems cant really go after him for doing genocide in Gaza, expanding ICE, slashing welfare, enriching himself bc they are all just as guilty. so they gotta go with the Russiagate hoax.
libs are playing all the hits. well, really just the only hit.
I mean I get it, Trump is tremendously easy to criticize given hes a fascist rapist, but Dems cant really go after him for doing genocide in Gaza, expanding ICE, slashing welfare, enriching himself bc they are all just as guilty. so they gotta go with the Russiagate hoax.
Notice how you don’t actually say anything at all about what he actually said and just pivot to your usual boring snark, as if it at all is relevant to what you quote tweeted
libs are playing all the hits. well, really just the only hit.
I mean I get it, Trump is tremendously easy to criticize given hes a fascist rapist, but Dems cant really go after him for doing genocide in Gaza, expanding ICE, slashing welfare, enriching himself bc they are all just as guilty. so they gotta go with the Russiagate hoax.
POT/KETTLE ALERT!!!
You don't need to live in a place to know that, if a reporter from a media company claims protests are "mostly peaceful" *while buildings are burning behind him*, you know that's a lie.Also, there are national stat data from *insurance companies*.Those were the most damaging riots *in recorded human history* on the insurance side
The definition of human life is just amazingly vast for the far right .
A cell is worth human life, a building is worth a human life , u can shoot to death someone stealing a tv since a tv is worth a human life ….
The definition of human life is just amazingly vast for the far right .
A cell is worth human life, a building is worth a human life , u can shoot to death someone stealing a tv since a tv is worth a human life ….
The vast majority of folks 'on the right' I believe would disagree with Luciom on that point.
I for one believe that people and property are qualitatively different.
It's not like one person = ten houses (or vice-versa) in any moral sense. You can insure a painting for a million dollars while a person may be insured for only $500,000 (for example). That doesn't mean the painting is worth two people in any moral sense.
The vast majority of folks 'on the right' I believe would disagree with Luciom on that point.I for one believe that people and property are qualitatively different. It's not like one person = ten houses (or vice-versa) in any moral sense. You can insure a painting for a million dollars while a person may be insured for only $500,000 (for example). That doesn't mean the paint
it actually does, for society, if those are the numbers. definitionally.
So, society determines the value of people? Not in any metaphysical sense, which was my context.
A star baseball player might make more money in one season than an award-winning teacher in their whole lifetime.
That shows the value as assessed by baseball owners and their fans, not necessarily society at large.
Notice how you don’t actually say anything at all about what he actually said and just pivot to your usual boring snark, as if it at all is relevant to what you quote tweeted
Most importantly, facts are somehow a hoax. That's my own research. Nothing I said was untrue. If that's triggering, then that should be a red flag for you.
If you're a thinking person, you should be asking... why no WH archival for only meetings w/ Putin? Why is it ok for everyone else? Why so many meetings w/ Putin compared to every other world leader?
There's obviously a reason.
trolling the president
If you have issues with what I’m putting out,
you sure as hell should have concerns with what he’s putting out
reporters are happy to question him about his unhinged posts, but not the President
https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.socia...
Trump Goons intimidate Newsom
In all seriousness, the tweets being put out in the name of Gavin Newsome are pretty great, even if it's not actually his team doing it.
Simply calling Trump names or making fun of the alleged shape of his penis are what a child might do. Trying to nail him with frivolous lawsuits are what politicians do, but clearly nothing sticks to Teflon Don. The tweets are fantastic. Do more of that to get people to laugh at him instead of whatever the hell they've been doing for the last decade.
who told you that the definition of insurance is “this is the exact, 100% no equivocation, value of this property or person”? lol
you’re saying a lot of ******ed things today, are you drunk?
that's what society main mechanism to value how much something is worth is telling you yes.
unless and until you have a better method, that is the best estimate of value (ofc if the insurance markets operate in competition and so on).
quite Marxist of you to deny that the best estimate of the value of something that isn't being transacted is it's insurable value.
As long as you post crap like this no one will take you serious. Unfortunately, it is in most of your thoughts.
if you think killing one person is worse than destroying one billion in property, you simply disagree with the vast majority of people *in their revealed preferences*.
it's common for people to say what you are implying here, but reality is, society is built upon the idea that a billion dollar of property is worth several hundreds human lives.
otherwise car speed limits would be 10 miles per hour in urban settings and 30 miles elsewhere, OBVIOUSLY.
people are willing to let thousands of people die horrible brutal deaths per year to gain miniscule (but diffused) monetary values individually daily across the year.
that's real life.
think of all avoidable death risks we allow , for efficiency (=monetary) gain, across the economy, take an average of the life equivalent in dollar terms of that, and bam you get a fairly precise estimate of what price tag society puts on a human life.
and imagine, there is a whole subsector of actuarial science doing literally that.
Giving away Alaska 😮 Putin most definitely has dirt on Trump
couple of criminals meeting by themselves to get their stories straight
trolling the presidentIf you have issues with what I’m putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns with what he’s putting outreporters are happy to question him about his unhinged posts, but not the Presidenthttps://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.socia...Trump Goons intimidate Newsom
How do you find these idiotic podcasters?
Is there now a youtube feed- setting marked "Podcasts by and for Idiots?"
At least years ago you will spamming us with MSNBC stuff, which at least wasn't utterly ridiculous.
Have a nice day!
And I still haven’t forgotten that nasty PM you sent me either. It must have felt good at the time to say those things to a 21 yo girl who couldn’t fight back. That’s the thing with words- they can linger in a persons mind longer than you intended.
You don’t even know who I am, do you.
No idea who you are.
I do apologise for any offense, without reservation, it's obviously something that stayed with you, and I really do not want to be that kind of a person. it's not my usual way to PM anything nasty. I rarely pm anything to anyone.
I mean that sincerely, and I'm fine with you banning me if it will help you to put it behind you. I've probably been on this site too long as it is.
