President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
Couch****er at Disneyland
I’d be pretty ****ing bummed if I wasted a few grand to take the family there this weekend only for everything to be even more of a pain in the ass only to end with Couch****er doing pressers about how woke Disney is and how they’re gonna look into it
This is just turning the can into will.Law enforcement officers know what an enormous waste of time it is to pick people up on little **** like throwing rocks. It's a lot of paperwork and effort for zero payoff.If the POTUS directs them to do it anyway, and "by any means necessary" which hints at violent takedowns if they resist, then maybe there will be a shift. I doubt it,
Better yet would be for the President to authorize the use of deadly force when these criminals use deadly force against law enforcement. Throwing rocks is deadly. Free speech is one things but interfering with law enforcements job is another.
Don't get your hopes up with this video nobody was actually run over.
Better yet would be for the President to authorize the use of deadly force when these criminals use deadly force against law enforcement. Throwing rocks is deadly. Free speech is one things but interfering with law enforcements job is another.
Don't get your hopes up with this video nobody was actually run over.
Would they really need special authorization for that?
FEMA cut contracts for people answering emergency calls starting in July 5 - as in the day after a disastrous flood in Texas.
FEMA cut contracts for people answering emergency calls starting in July 5 - as in the day after a disastrous flood in Texas.
It is of course morally indefensible to cut everything they cut, but to do so and still GROW the deficit is just cartoonish levels of evil championed by the stupidest ****ing people alive who just want the right to say the n word and will give everything they have to the rich to make it happen
No seriously where is inso or whatever his name is to tell us that Trump was just joking about stripping citizenship from someone he just doesn't like?
‘People need to understand ICE officers and Border Patrol don't need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them ... based on their physical appearance.’-HomanSo if you’re not white we get to hassle you is now the law of the landPretty cool mandate you’ve established for your gestapo you’ve fed a couple hundred billion into‘Kopala’s fault for n
JFC
That ellipsis is doing so much work to change this quote. You wonder why people are so sick of your bullshit on the far left.
JFC
That ellipsis is doing so much work to change this quote. You wonder why people are so sick of your bullshit on the far left.
this is the actual quote
People need to understand, ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] officers and Border Patrol don’t need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them,” he said on “Fox & Friends.”
“They just go through the observations, get articulable facts, based on their location, their occupation, their physical appearance, their actions.”
“Look, people need to understand, ICE officers and Border Patrol don’t need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them. They just need totality of the circumstances, right? They just go through the observation, get our typical facts — based on the location, the occupation, their physical appearance, their actions.”
What do you feel like is the important distinction from what was posted?
‘People need to understand ICE officers and Border Patrol don't need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them ... based on their physical appearance.’-HomanSo if you’re not white we get to hassle you is now the law of the landPretty cool mandate you’ve established for your gestapo you’ve fed a couple hundred billion into‘Kopala’s fault for n
Dems gave ICE record funding and promised to increase it even more.
JFC
That ellipsis is doing so much work to change this quote. You wonder why people are so sick of your bullshit on the far left.
If it makes you feel any better I’m sick of your bullshit too
Feel free to gargle my balls at your earliest convenience
JFC
That ellipsis is doing so much work to change this quote. You wonder why people are so sick of your bullshit on the far left.
THERE HE IS
IT WAS THE ELLIPSIS GUYS
Funniest part is the full quote is actually worse
No, no it's totally different. Now they need probable cause to detain you because...well, you see...there was an ellipsis and some words were skipped.
JFCThat ellipsis is doing so much work to change this quote. You wonder why people are so sick of your bullshit on the far left.
this is the actual quotePeople need to understand, ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] officers and Border Patrol don’t need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them, ” he said on “Fox & Friends.”“They just g
Lol actual quote is actually worse.
Completly different, totally , abyssal difference, physical appearance there doesn't even mean race, it can mean if you dress poorly or are dressed to work in some specific settings that ICE is raiding because of tips about illegals working in that setting.
But please be outraged at absolutely normal approaches by law enforcement. If law enforcement is looking for an asian suspect it is not illegal profiling to... stop asians.
If ICE is looking for mexican illegals working in a field in place X because of information about... mexican illegals working there, then profiling for mexican-looking people is absolutely perfectly legal, normal, reasonable, pragmatical, acceptable.
And you know that... as usual.
So my question is did InseL know what the actual quote was at the time he was outraged by my post or was he just betting the farm that I was blindly cherry picking and he would be able to grandstand while appearing to have any moral high ground?
Or, as always, is InseL just a ****ing dipshit?
you "don't need probable cause", you can just snatch people up "based on their location, their occupation, their physical appearance", problem? they mean white guys wearing suits in manhattan, right?
i know the constitution doesn't matter anymore, but isn't this unconstitutional?
Whenever that was, it's no longer the record.
It really is worse.
Ignoring that Homan sounded drunk because I don't know if he always sounds drunk.
Location: Farms and Home Depots? Kitchens at Italian restaurants? Homes of people suspected of harboring Illegals?
Occupation: Crop picker or day laborer? Line cooks? Software Programmers and owners of Donut shops?
Physical Appearance: Hispanic, Middle Eastern, or African? Asian? White, but kind of liberal looking?
Actions: Picking crops or sitting outside a home depot? Making food? Walking down the street?
What are we even talking about here lol
like i said....if you couldn't recognize these people for what they were in 2016 and rid your lives of them.....
"based on their location, their occupation, their physical appearance"
i can't wait for the pendulum to swing....and it always swings.
like i said....if you couldn't recognize these people for what they were in 2016 and rid your lives of them.....
"based on their location, their occupation, their physical appearance"
i can't wait for the pendulum to swing....and it always swings.
Unfortunately, it won't swing far enough that people will be snatched off the streets for wearing red baseball caps.
