President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
You're the one running away from my calling out your error or misrepresentation.
What questions did you ask me?
The only one I can find is "The posters here who were talking about ... what exactly?". I assumed that was rhetorical, not that you actually needed me to explain to you what people were discussing here.
Just wow. You really are just that fing dumb. Was giving you the benefit of the doubt with the whole lazy thing. But no. It's worst case.
What "people" were discussing, huh? You mean, me, df. Me. I wasn't asking you what *I* was discussing. I was demonstrating that you weren't following the conversation by showing that what we were discussing was the lady losing her home and life. Df up there equivocated it with a gd parking fine. And you couldn't wait to distract from that sht.
And btw he wasn't equivocating our complaining about the lady to the people complaining about the parking fine. There's no parallel at all. The parallel was someone that was allowed to do something for decades and then having the rug pulled out from under them. That applied to the lady and the parking violators. Not us.
This isn't even that hard man. I don't know, have someone explain it to you, I guess.
It is possible to garnish a bank account, but it's a royal pain in the dick and you can only ever get what's in there on the day of the pull. For a broke tenant who skipped out on 6 months of rent, you're lucky to recoup what it cost you to get the bank levy in the first place. Now they close their account and you have to go find out their new bank to try again.
A vast majority of tenants are simply judgment-proof. The best method I have of avoiding someone stiffing me is to screen very selectively.
One bad tenant can wipe out literal years of profit on a unit. People like to hate on landlords as leeches, but unless you have many hundreds/thousands of units and can leverage the economy of scale, you're basically just breaking even or slowly bleeding each year and just waiting to cash out the equity at retirement. It's a terrible way to make a living, and I don't recommend it to anyone.
Maybe if you weren't such a social price-gouging disease people wouldn't try to stiff you so often.
Aren't right wingers like you supposed to view their behaviour as the market telling you to change your ways or go and **** yourself?
If you want price-gouging, you should see the Milwaukee property tax bills this year.
Sweet baby Jesus.
Yet another insult without even a denial of my claim or quote of these questions I've supposedly avoided.
You remind me of every prominent member of the Trump administration in press conferences.
Also, IQ test 4 rollz?
Read the edit, you illiterate jackhole.
And you're not worth the effort I put into that post, either, so consider yourself lucky to get that much attention.
Yet another insult without even a denial of my claim or quote of these questions I've supposedly avoided.
You remind me of every prominent member of the Trump administration in press conferences.
Also, IQ test 4 rollz?
gorgo, if you're willing to do this and wager more of it than rob is willing to put up to risk then i will accept additional action against you and on rob winning
Just wow. You really are just that fing dumb. Was giving you the benefit of the doubt with the whole lazy thing. But no. It's worst case. What "people" were discussing, huh? You mean, me, df. Me. I wasn't asking you what *I* was discussing. I was demonstrating that you weren't following the conversation by showing that what we were discussing was the lady losing her home and li
Wow, you really were misunderstanding posts of everyone with whom you disagree, and even some by those on your side.
I know you're not illiterate, so it's obvious your cognitive biases prevent you from successfully processing any comment which doesn't align with your general world view. Just like the Trump supporters I watch on YouTube being mocked by liberal interviewers, but on the opposite side. I guess there are people like that on both sides.
Wow, you really were misunderstanding posts of everyone with whom you disagree, and even some by those on your side. I know you're not illiterate, so it's obvious your cognitive biases prevent you from successfully processing any comment which doesn't align with your general world view. Just like the Trump supporters I watch on YouTube being mocked by liberal interviewers, but
And here you see the reason I wasn't bothering with more. You just ignored it rather than respond to it.
Seriousy gfys.
On to ignore you go.
I thought you'd at least appreciate it. In all seriousness, you might remember I made promises to no longer gamble or do prop bets. I haven't done anything of the sort since 2009, and I don't plan to start now. I'm happy to let the disgraceful display above make my point.
I thought you'd at least appreciate it. In all seriousness, you might remember I made promises to no longer gamble or do prop bets. I haven't done anything of the sort since 2009, and I don't plan to start now. I'm happy to let the disgraceful display above make my point.
i don't think you're dumb at all, but rob is 100% spot on that you fall prey to cognitive bias to the point that a lot of what you post is completely absurd
i think you're both very smart fwiw, but given that rob is always clear headed would have to give him the edge - furthermore i have full confidence that he is rational enough not to offer that (which is a very appropriate response if someone calls you an idiot btw) unless he had strong evidence and conviction of winning the contest - which made it an easy decision over which side to back
it's fine if you attack people like mong or even me to a lesser degree who often say inflammatory stuff, but rob never attacks anyone iirc so unless i missed some stuff you attacking him seemingly out the blue seems really off
it's like when i referenced my gf's car getting broken into the other night because it was on topic in regards to homeless people in seattle and whether a neighborhood allows it or buses them out and a bunch of posters took that opportunity to attack her, i mean come one guys, go after me, that's fine, but people adjacent to our lives shouldn't be catching strays simply because we acknowledge they exist - otherwise this entire thread would be nothing but people talking about overweight spouses which mong would narrate over an ai crafted animation backdrop for his next chaturb8 venture - and that's something nobody wants
https://x.com/reaganreese_/status/194014...
NEWS: The Trump admin has struck a deal with UPenn, forcing the school to strip Lia Thomas of his records, titles and other recognitions won while competing on the women’s sports team.

Maybe if you weren't such a social price-gouging disease people wouldn't try to stiff you so often.
Aren't right wingers like you supposed to view their behaviour as the market telling you to change your ways or go and **** yourself?
If the market is free yes. If your pain comes from insane regulations like those we are discussing, not necessarily.
Like why can't you forcibly repossess the unit the day after they don't pay rent? if "a family going homeless" is something society wants to avoid, they should pay your rent or house them somewhere else, how is it your responsibility as a landlord to house people in distress?
https://x.com/reaganreese_/status/194014...NEWS: The Trump admin has struck a deal with UPenn, forcing the school to strip Lia Thomas of his records, titles and other recognitions won while competing on the women’s sports team.
wow
i don't think you're dumb at all, but rob is 100% spot on that you fall prey to cognitive bias to the point that a lot of what you post is completely absurdi think you're both very smart fwiw, but given that rob is always clear headed would have to give him the edge - furthermore i have full confidence that he is rational enough not to offer that (which is a very appropriate re
Sorry I'm not reading all that. None of it changes that he was clearly demonstrably wrong above. Really not interested in your or anyone else's breakdown.
i don't think you're dumb at all, but rob is 100% spot on that you fall prey to cognitive bias to the point that a lot of what you post is completely absurdi think you're both very smart fwiw, but given that rob is always clear headed would have to give him the edge - furthermore i have full confidence that he is rational enough not to offer that (which is a very appropriate re
please don't be too harsh with gorgo, he is canadian after all