President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump

I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?

So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at

103 Views
28 April 2019 at 04:18 AM
Reply...

39342 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by checkraisdraw

the most unrealistic part of that comic is gays and lesbos being friendly towards each other


Man someone give this guy the Nobel peace prize


Grunch:

Are we headed for WWIII
?


lol


by StoppedRainingMen

Man someone give this guy the Nobel peace prize

I told everybody that Trump was gonna win it.

What a brilliant move. He made everyone think there was gonna be a two week negotiating period. Nope!


by 57 On Red

The Director of National Intelligence has today revised the view she gave in March.

'Within weeks' sounds absurd, frankly. But reports that Iran isn't building a bomb are also absurd, because the Iranians don't yet have the material to build one, so of course they aren't. However, the IAEA notes that Iran is the only non-nuclear-weap

I'm aware of that but completely disregard it because Trump told her she is wrong and she knows what her job is and she is making sure she keeps it.

by All-inMcLovin

Grunch:

Are we headed for WWIII
?

Yup, and it's Biden's fault because he made Trumpers vote for Trump.


Hey! Where are all the anti Trumpers tonight? Is there another protest/riot going on?


by mongidig

Hey! Where are all the anti Trumpers tonight? Is there another protest/riot going on?

I think a bunch of 1/6ers are bringing their gallows to California, looking for another pardon.


couldn't give two ****s about bombing iran. i think it's equally dumb to think it will start wwiii, as it is to think that we "wiped out" their nuclear program.


This bomb never used before and they have no idea its effectiveness or its results in this attack. Don't let that stop the announcement of what a great success it was. That said, when a country announces its intent to obliterate a people, an ally, on the basis of the bullshyt religion stories, that gets what it deserves. I don't have a problem with it, and it isn't a violation of The Donald's claim not to go to war, imo.


Nobody is gonna come to Israel/USA’s side just like nobody will come to Iran’s side on this and Iran is catastrophically overmatched

I don’t believe regime change is on the table here, best guess is Iran continues strikes for a few more days to save face before essentially resigning the Obama deal which trump will declare as a total victory


by FellaGaga-52

This bomb never used before and they have no idea its effectiveness or its results in this attack. Don't let that stop the announcement of what a great success it was. That said, when a country announces its intent to obliterate a people, an ally, on the basis of the bullshyt religion stories, that gets what it deserves. I don't have a problem with it, and it isn't a violation

He committed a war act without authorization of congress. It’s unconstitutional and he should be impeached. That’s regardless of whether I agree with his actions or not.


by #Thinman

couldn't give two ****s about bombing iran. i think it's equally dumb to think it will start wwiii, as it is to think that we "wiped out" their nuclear program.

My post was mostly tongue-in-cheek, but why do you think WWIII is not possible?

Anyway, like it or not, we're knee deep in it with an administration full of reetards.

by Trump the Cuck

We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have d


by checkraisdraw

He committed a war act without authorization of congress. It’s unconstitutional and he should be impeached. That’s regardless of whether I agree with his actions or not.

Plus there’s this

In case anyone was curious if the republicans had any hesitation to abet an authoritarian


by FellaGaga-52

I don't have a problem with it, and it isn't a violation of The Donald's claim not to go to war, imo.

Trump's calling it a war.

by Trump the Cuck

I will be giving an Address to the Nation at 10:00 P.M., at the White House, regarding our very successful military operation in Iran. This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!

Edit:

Here's your no war boy Trump:


by checkraisdraw

He committed a war act without authorization of congress. It’s unconstitutional and he should be impeached. That’s regardless of whether I agree with his actions or not.

How is this legally different than all the other bombings the US has done in the Middle East since 9/11 that weren't authorized by Congress?


by checkraisdraw

He committed a war act without authorization of congress. It’s unconstitutional and he should be impeached. That’s regardless of whether I agree with his actions or not.

Stop it!

Lets celebrate. Tonight we are all MAGA!


by checkraisdraw

He committed a war act without authorization of congress. It’s unconstitutional and he should be impeached. That’s regardless of whether I agree with his actions or not.

Check out Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Nicaragua.


by Dunyain

How is this legally different than all the other bombings the US has done in the Middle East since 9/11 that weren't authorized by Congress?

Not connected to AUMF


as I said other thread Im very rusty with my geopolitics but I was kinda surprised Iran didn't have more support outside russia and possibly china just to go against Israel or speak of it.
i do know it seems Saudi isn't the biggest fan of iran getting "nukes"


by StoppedRainingMen

Man someone give this guy the Nobel peace prize

by housenuts

.




by Land O Lakes

My post was mostly tongue-in-cheek, but why do you think WWIII is not possible?

Anyway, like it or not, we're knee deep in it with an administration full of reetards.

Why would anything that happened today cause a meaningful increase of causing ww3? We had full scale invasions and forced regime changes in Iraq and Afghanistan killing a half a million that lingered forever, and it never caused a risk. Now we dropped a few buster blasters that probably didn't even really do anything.

Anything is possible, but the countries that would want to, or feel is needed to, would be putting up their entire economic and political stability at risk, for what exactly?

Also, the people who have the most military leverage, also have the most incentives to protect their wealth and safeguard their economic interests. I think when the world economy is so highly interconnected between nations, you're going to need a very severe trigger to outweigh all those who will be calling for and demanding stability for their own self interests.

You're going to need some serious wartime upside to put all of that at risk.


I feel like Putin losing his mind over Ukraine and turning to his warheads is probably the most likely trigger to that but who knows.


by formula72

Why would anything that happened today cause a meaningful increase of causing ww3? We had full scale invasions and forced regime changes in Iraq and Afghanistan killing a half a million that lingered forever, and it never caused a risk. Now we dropped a few buster blasters that probably didn't even really do anything.Anything is possible, but the countries that would want to,

I'm not steeped in foreign affairs by any means, but doesn't China get most of their oil from Iran?

It's also not the greatest sign when Xi said two days ago, "If the Middle East is unstable, the world will not be at peace."

The day before that, Russia says the world is millimeters away from nuclear catastrophe. That was regarding Bushehr's nuclear plant having a Chernobyl-type incident if they bomb that nuclear power plant. They also said an attack on that plant would be "beyond evil," presumably because they have hundreds of Russians working at the plant.

There's always been awesome outcomes when superpowers use the word evil.

Then another Russian foreign minister said, "God forbid; the consequences would be hard to predict" when asked what he thought about the possibility of the US joining Israel.

Sure, that might be all bullshit, but let's just say I'm not too confident with Trump at the helm when the stakes are this high and delicate and Iran is not Iraq. Iraq had no countries that were formal allies - no one gave a shiit.

by formula72

Also, the people who have the most military leverage, also have the most incentives to protect their wealth and safeguard their economic interests. I think when the world economy is so highly interconnected between nations, you're going to need a very severe trigger to outweigh all those who will be calling for and demanding stability for their own self interests. You're goin

Indeed. And you can be sure China and such will make well-measured moves, while Trump will just do whatever he hears on Fox and Friends.

Reply...