In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
You probably want a "real left" because you would feel represented if it existed but I don't understand how you think a "real left" could win presidential elections or purple seats in the house or in the Senate.
It really has little or nothing to do with me personally. I just believe the reg. working people of this country deserve to have a political party that puts their interests first. What's the point of having a country at all if most of the people in it are just an afterthought?
This person teaches at Harvard law. This person is a trans activist that didn't like the latest SCOTUS decision on the topic.
People here denied that top tier colleges had people like this among their numbers, and that radical leftism is inherently inimical to the core values of our societies
I don't know who that is nor do I care. You similarly shouldn't know who that is and also shouldn't care
If you think it's a nobrainer that they will prefer to have the waiting times of the NHS to their current system, i don't know what to say.They don't even believe what waiting times are with socialist healthcare. Literally they don't believe it. You link to them that luxembourg is a lot worse than the worst american state and they think it's all made up by rightwing people.Like
Yes crazy the idea of non urgent surgery being on a longer waitung list then urgent surgery .
Regardless of the amount of money you have .
Nothing prevent rich people to get surgery elsewhere if they want to pay more shrug.
Pretty much whats happening in education …
This person teaches at Harvard law. This person is a trans activist that didn't like the latest SCOTUS decision on the topic. People here denied that top tier colleges had people like this among their numbers, and that radical leftism is inherently inimical to the core values of our societies
Free speech is bad when u don’t agree with it huh ?
Imagine how we feel towards you when u go on a rant …
I don't know who that is nor do I care. You similarly shouldn't know who that is and also shouldn't care
Sure i "shouldn't know" that ****ed up crazy radical leftist extremists are teachers at harvard law.
Then when you guys ask "why is the right so upset with harvard" and we tell you "it's a den of horrifically bad people" you claim that's completly false.
Sure i "shouldn't know" that ****ed up crazy radical leftist extremists are teachers at harvard law.
Then when you guys ask "why is the right so upset with harvard" and we tell you "it's a den of horrifically bad people" you claim that's completly false.
A law professor had an opinion about a Supreme Court decision, oh the humanity
An harvard law professor wants the USA to dissolve and burn to the ground. The radical leftism. Which you denied was prominent in Harvard.
And so, it's not only proper but morally necessary for the US government to top giving money to institutions that employ those people, if they don't fire them all.
I am sure you would agree if a law professor at Harvard was asking for a return of slavery being constitutionally allowed.
Wow we’ve uncovered rock solid evidence that the 2020 election was stolen with the help of a foreign power.
Should we investigate further and charge the perpetrators with serious crime?
Nah- let’s just publish a couple emails and call up Infowars to blow it out.
LOL, citing Alex Jones is the absolute nut low. You can't get much stupider or horrible.
My favorite is using a Colorado postal worker's pleading guilty to rigging the 2024 presidential election to support the claim that the 2020 election was rigged:
An harvard law professor wants the USA to dissolve and burn to the ground. The radical leftism. Which you denied was prominent in Harvard.And so, it's not only proper but morally necessary for the US government to top giving money to institutions that employ those people, if they don't fire them all.I am sure you would agree if a law professor at Harvard was asking for a return
Who do you think is being more hyperbolic; her saying she will dance on the US grave or you pretending this tweet in a vacuum represents something profound
It was a fairly unconstitutional, even anti-constitutional opinion, so not really what a law professor gets paid for.
Maybe she was tweeting during class but not sure how we could know
An harvard law professor wants the USA to dissolve and burn to the ground. The radical leftism. Which you denied was prominent in Harvard.
And every time I hear a rightwinger claim the right are 'true' anarchists I make sure to remind them what that actually means--no more USA patriot 😀 Regardless, it couldn't be more obvious they aren't really anarchists anyway(other than maybe a few dust bunnies) otherwise they wouldn't get so pumped up over strict law&order or border issues etc. Arguing for a somewhat more limited govt in some specific contexts is not trending toward anarchy either. Then a week later they'll be saying something that actually does paint the left in a way that actually does trend in that direction lol Because let's face it they're morons 😀
If a lawyer can’t toot some booger sugar and blast off an ill advised tweet then what even is America
If a lawyer can’t toot some booger sugar and blast off an ill advised tweet then what even is America
It's funny the tweets of randoms are of utmost importance to Lucy and his pals, but US president's ones are ok.
Back when I had twitter I remember Alejandra being one of the most spineless and annoying lefties on the platform. So I’m not a fan. At the same time I feel like the right-wing literally calls for the ending of American institutions all the time and gets a pass so at this point I just think that we either say everyone is inimical to American values or we just let the whole thing keep spiraling. I’m not going to pick her out specifically to castigate much as I think she deserves it.
An harvard law professor wants the USA to dissolve and burn to the ground. The radical leftism. Which you denied was prominent in Harvard.And so, it's not only proper but morally necessary for the US government to top giving money to institutions that employ those people, if they don't fire them all.I am sure you would agree if a law professor at Harvard was asking for a return
If u have an opinion u should get fired seem pretty the same thing….
Why would I update my priors based off of false information?https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-re...Unless you’re counting like babies and people who aren’t able to vote lolAlso, what you said is perfectly consistent with what I said. I never gave a strong claim one way or the other. I even said that another
lol this isnt the win you think it is. but sure, getting around 30% of the public is fine.
