President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
Yeah, this is the biggie. Manufacture chaos, then use authoritarian methods to "quell" the chaos, and a large faction of so called freedom loving Americans get behind the authoritarianism and it grows like a cancer until one day it affects them, too, and then it's too late. Right now is the easiest time to oppose it and collectively we're failing. Yeah, except for the part wher
Paso's post was literally identical to Kirk's, including punctuation.
Walsh's was posted first and Kirk's was similar to Walsh's.
addendum: And I didn't see the original posts, just what I saw in this forum.
Not sure why you think this.
I believe the following two things can be true at the same time:
1. A large majoirity of the protestors are there to protest and not cause harm to anyone.
2. A few bad hombres caused trouble that caused a riot.
My position seems to me to be the common sense position.
If that's "playing both sides", then I say 'Amen!' to playing both sides!
With regards to the .9 and 1 proofs.
The division / appeal to 1/3 multiplied by 3 is wrong, it implies that infinite addition and multiplication work the same as finite addition and multiplication, which they do not. It's almost begging the question.
The geometric series proof is the most elegant while being mathematically 100% correct.
The squeeze theorem proof is an appeal to intuition, and as chez pointed out, doesn't work in all number systems, in particular those including infinitesimals. But it's fun.
Personally, when I start to explain this to people, I find it helpful to show first of all that in our decimal system, there are multiple ways of writing the same number. For example, 2, 30/15ths and 4/2nds all represent the same number. Once someone's mind is open to the fact that it is possible to write the same number in different ways, the rest is just, as they say, painting by numbers.
I think "confrontational dialogue" is great. I engage in that type of dialogue often myself. By its very nature, a Politics Forum is confrontational.
Maybe this is a new concept for some, but it is possible to be confrontational without being hysterical..
Name calling and using profanity in almost every post is being hysterical in my opinion.
I don't really give a **** if you don't like profanity or insults. I also don't give a **** if you view it as "hysteria"
You playing white knight to all the conservative posters isn't productive.
You generally come across like a nice guy so I'll leave it at that.
I don't really give a **** if you don't like profanity or insults. I also don't give a **** if you view it as "hysteria"
You playing white knight to all the conservative posters isn't productive.
Wow, another hysterical post. Where's my shock face. Oh, here it is: :shocked:
Please try harder to pay attention. I've called out Luciom and Mongy just today alone.
You generally come across like a nice guy so I'll leave it at that.
Thank you. I appreciate you and Crossnerd allowing me to participate here.
National Guard was there before the Waymos were on fire.
The division / appeal to 1/3 multiplied by 3 is wrong, it implies that infinite addition and multiplication work the same as finite addition and multiplication, which they do not. It's almost begging the question.
I should add that generally, whenever you see an ellipsis in a proof, it's not a proof. You can use those to prove that 1=2 or 1=0 or whatever. Syntactically, there is nothing about an ellipsis that belongs in any proof. So, a statement like "0.333..... multiplied by" is meaningless. It means nothing.
It's like asking "what is the next number in the sequence 2,4,8,16?". For one pattern, 2^n, it's 32. For another pattern, the maximum number of crossings between lines with n being the number of points on the circumference of a circle, it's 31.
0.3333... is the sum from one to infinity of 3/10^n. You can multiply that by 3 and see that the sum of 9/10^n from 1 to infinity is 1.
Victor: Dems want our military treated with respect, crazy they’re crying about this
Mongoloid: biden disrespected our military so much that they’re now sleeping on top of each other
Corpus: I’m not American
That religious dipshit: stop swearing
and whatever that is, that's not fascism.
and anyone claiming it is is either IQ <85 or in the worst bad faith possible
Lucy: kill them all
The irony of some ****boi Italian incel who is not an American citizen and probably jerks off to his mass shooting fantasies telling Americans how they should run their country while also saying immigrants should be allowed zero say is, well, something
Victor: Dems want our military treated with respect, crazy they’re crying about this
Mongoloid: biden disrespected our military so much that they’re now sleeping on top of each other
Corpus: I’m not American
That religious dipshit: stop swearing
I never told or asked anyone to stop swearing, liar.
I'm actually far more tolerant of what words ought to be allowed than the moderators here.
Coordi called out Land 'O Lakes for circumventing the filter to call me a r*****d, which I think should be perfectly fine for LOL to call me that if he wants.
Also I made it clear in an earlier post that I have no opinion on whether or not President Trump should be employing the National Guard.
Anyhoo, please read more carefully and please stop lying. (Or not; your choice.)
I never told or asked anyone to stop swearing, liar.I'm actually far more tolerant of what words ought to be allowed than the moderators here.Coordi called out Land 'O Lakes for circumventing the filter to call me a r*****d, which I think should be perfectly fine for LOL to call me that if he wants.Also I made it clear in an earlier post that I have no opinion on whether or no
Stop being hysterical, pussy
You don’t even know I’m referring to you
armed thugs get sent to his state to do violence on the people fighting fascism and Newsome complains about the comfort of the thugs? this is why Dems and their supporters are a joke.
Victor: ‘some low effort, intellectually dishonest ‘this is somehow your fault so any of your complaints are invalid’ platitude’
