President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
It would be pretty damning about clone technology
Maybe he's just doing it for fun to trigger libtards. And it seems to be working.
Rank these important recent revelations in order of lib triggering:
-mongidig is a D level Andrew Tate
-Biden clone army
-BJ is married to biological woman of unknown attractiveness
Tough to say.
Why would I say I'm married to trigger libtards? That doesn't make sense.
Mind you they do seem to be triggered by it though. Very strange.
Why would I say I'm married to trigger libtards? That doesn't make sense.
Mind you they do seem to be triggered by it though. Very strange.
I mean, we could all be mocking you and mong and calling you dumb pricks because we're triggered. Or it could be because you're dumb pricks. Who knows, it's a mystery.
Lol Gotta hand it to D2. He knows I've got him on ignore and don't read his posts but he keeps trying to get my attention like a little puppy dog trying to get attention from it's master.
Very cute in a sad kind of way.
Lol Gotta hand it to D2. He knows I've got him on ignore and don't read his posts but he keeps trying to get my attention like a little puppy dog trying to get attention from it's master.
Very cute in a sad kind of way.
Interesting. Putting someone on ignore seems like something that a person with a rather fragile ego who doesn't like to have his bullshit challenged would do.
But don't take it from me, take it from these guys:
You have to wonder about the fragility of a person who has to put a person on ignore. Clearly they can't emotionally handle what you are saying. Could they not just skip over your post or is the mere sight of certain people that triggering? I can't imagine what this persons real life interactions are like if he can't handle an anonymous person on the internet.
Yep. His type do t
Lol. See what I mean.
Throw him a bone and he'll be happy for months.
Lol Gotta hand it to D2. He knows I've got him on ignore and don't read his posts but he keeps trying to get my attention like a little puppy dog trying to get attention from it's master.
Very cute in a sad kind of way.
How did you know I was responding to you? My post is 3 posts below yours.
Haha. See what I mean. He can't help himself.
He craves attention. Poor little puppy. Now run along, there's a good boy.
Oh dear BJ, caught in yet another lie it seems. Just think, if you hadn't started mouthing off about having me on ignore, you wouldn't have had your pants pulled down and your tiny little pecker on show for everyone to point and laugh at. Hoisted by your own petard there, big brain.
Now that you've actually put me on ignore, you're probably going to post something moronic after this like "hurr durr all I see is 'This message is hidden because d2_e4 is on your ignore list'", as if that's proof of anything. You're such an unoriginal and predictable dipshit.
Funny, I get all these messages popping up after my posts.
"This message is hidden because d2_e4 is on your ignore list. Remove user from ignore list"
Very strange.
Once again, it's fine if she wants to claim he's not married, and it's fine if he wants to make a bullshit bet offer because he knows she would never accept due to it being impossible to prove the person posting on his account is married. The latter has nothing to do with whether he's actually married or not. Then what has to do with you supporting antichrists?I asked a questio
I don't support 'antichrists.'
Peace!
This should be easy to pick apart.
Trump is the antithesis of Christ.
You support Trump.
Have as nice day!
I don't think you're using a correct definition of 'antichrist':
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/antich...
noun
Theology.
1.a particular personage or power, variously identified or explained, who is conceived of as appearing in the world as the principal antagonist of Christ.
2. (sometimes lowercase) an opponent of Christ; a person or power antagonistic to Christ.
3. (often lowercase) a disbeliever in Christ.
4. (often lowercase) a false Christ.
The closest definition to describe Trump would be #2 above in my opinion.
If that's what you meant, then I would respectfully ask you to name even one well-known politician that would not describe.
Anyhoo, I am not presently endorsing or condemning any politicians and shan't be discussing electoral politics right now.
I will engage social issues, but not from an electoral perspective.
Essentially, I think we agree in the 'big-picture' sense.
I’m always confused at the point of trying to ‘gotcha’ these clowns
Down to a ‘man’ every last of one of these shitshows are amoral frauds. This is known. Trying to get them to admit is just a pointless exercise
That’s why I prefer to relentlessly needle them all for being pieces of **** rather than debate them on anything intelligible
The worst part about trump getting re-elected is the average person will remember who Donald Trump is for the next 15 years. Had he lost no one would be talking about him in 3 years. Ok not the worst part but still really bad. I think baccarat is a waste of time but not nearly as big of a waste of time as talking about Trump. Besides his narcisscism which is his one good trait, his character ranges from incredibly boring all the way to horrifyingly evil. I wish I could never hear someone talk about him again.
Then of course you have actual problems caused by an unending stream of conspiracy theories and outright hatred on the internet. People are being rewarded the most for saying the dumbest things possible and I’m left to wonder when it will stop. Forums like x being a contest to see who can combine creepiness, hatred, and idiocy into the most toxic sludge win out.
Theres multiple wars going on and a regress in lgbt rights amongst others. We live in a world where figuratively loud Keno players get millions of views and dollars for suggesting blackjack players are the only reason most keno players lose.Where down is up and where everyone wink wink trusts politicians who hate them the most.
If Trump believed in Christ and was Christlike, you wouldn't need to obfuscate the issue with dictionary definitions and "whaddabout other politicians" deflections.
This is about you and your hypocrisy. Sleep tight.
Also, stop using the word shan't. You're not British, poser.

