[SWCPoker] Bitcoin poker
Edit/MH: Posts moved from old Seals With Clubs thread.
*
Update on Seals site.
TL;DR: SealsWithClubs will not come back wi
Funny how you call me a cheater, yet provide ZERO proof – just like SWC Poker did.I played fair, requested evidence, and got none. Instead, they deleted my messages and banned me.My full story is published on the most popular and trusted blogging platform – Medium.com and Mirror.xyz. If you're afraid to click the link, just search "medium.com + [YOUR NICKNAME]" on Google, and y
maybe you could copy n paste the text from your full story and put it here
I do not want to do this because it will negatively affect the SEO of this article (duplicate). The article also has sectioning and lots of pictures., titles, quotes etc which would be difficult on a PHP forum.
popek, this only proves that you or someone youre connected to has control of the gd1990 account, and it proves that you value the popularity of a blog article more than your good name. there may even be people posting in this thread that could help you, but your reluctance to participate here is preventing this.
popek, this only proves that you or someone youre connected to has control of the gd1990 account, and it proves that you value the popularity of a blog article more than your good name. there may even be people posting in this thread that could help you, but your reluctance to participate here is preventing this.
Yes, of course, gd1990 belongs to me. My only goal here is to warn others about what happened.
I don’t want anyone to get scammed the way I did, which is why I spent hours writing this article and sharing it in multiple places. This is just a cautionary tale, nothing more.
Honestly, it seems like you haven’t even read the article. If you want to defend SWC, at least read it first and give me solid arguments why they were right.
So far, no one has been able to provide even one valid argument in their defense. Maybe you can be the first? 😉
youre right, i didn't read your article. the onus is not on me nor anyone else here.
i dont feel ive defended anything but the truth. truth is that the minimal evidence youve provided here does nothing for your case.
this is all besides the point that it seems nearly impossible to prove your innocence without testimony from michaelde and caroline93.
you dont want to share the story here.
we dont want to go to a different site to hear your story.
its an impasse. im going to sit out for now until something useful is posted.
Their claim? That I used multiple accounts to manipulate the game.
The reality? Most of my winnings did not come from the accounts they claim belong to me (MichaelDE & Caroline93) but from well-known regular players on SWC Poker.
...yes, that would be the point of having multiple accounts in the same game. To collude against the other players and take their money.
What would actually help your argument is if you posted every hand history from that session.
3⃣ NEW DATA: while cleaning my laptop I found the complete hand history from my 10-hour session.
Since SWC refuses to publish it, I will.
• Who played, when, and with what cards.
• Exactly where my chips came from.
Judge for yourselves.
3⃣ NEW DATA: while cleaning my laptop I found the complete hand history from my 10-hour session.
Since SWC refuses to publish it, I will.
• Who played, when, and with what cards.
• Exactly where my chips came from.
Judge for yourselves.
I didn't look at that playing History in full obviously, but I've looked at it till ~"Line 5000" or so and it comes to mind that either literally everyone at that table is playing poker for the first time or this is the softest site ever and you actually may make more Regs join this site when people See this.
Wether or not you are at fault or not I won't comment, because I have zero expirience with this site, but there's loads of stuff looking weird there over the small sample I have seen already. Just my 2cts...
I didn't look at that playing History in full obviously, but I've looked at it till ~"Line 5000" or so and it comes to mind that either literally everyone at that table is playing poker for the first time or this is the softest site ever and you actually may make more Regs join this site when people See this. Wether or not you are at fault or not I won't comment, because I have
well considering this was posted by the site
this from the telegram support channel recently: i think its a step in the right direction, of more transparency.
do you think its likely that at the equivalent of $20/$40 NL, on a site where a hand full of crushers open sit the lobby all day, that there is just a table full of droolers punting about? or one dumbass so blatantly multi-accounting with 3 accounts in the same game he couldn't make it past one session before ban?
its kinda moot because the site is tumbleweeds, but I've played here for like a decade and feel they do a pretty decent job of policing the games.
well considering this was posted by the sitedo you think its likely that at the equivalent of $20/$40 NL, on a site where a hand full of crushers open sit the lobby all day, that there is just a table full of droolers punting about? or one dumbass so blatantly multi-accounting with 3 accounts in the same game he couldn't make it past one session before ban?its kinda moot becaus
This is NL4K?!
I didn't know what the equivivalent of "Chips" is over there, but in this case it looks even worse obviously
This site should get way more traffic! It is great for HU in many formats
Tell me about it! I've written about it here many times, but unfortunately it seems that those who run SWC don't advertise it and, in fact, very few people know about it.
what would really help your case, popek, is if two other verifiable humans were also proclaiming their innocence and claiming ownership of the other two accused and banned accounts. instead its as though youre the only one who cares about this.
Tell me about it! I've written about it here many times, but unfortunately it seems that those who run SWC don't advertise it and, in fact, very few people know about it.
it's truly a shame. the browser client is fantastic and they've never had any issues with cash outs, etc...and they have so many obscure games, including kansas city lowball and open face chinese. but the nlhe action sure dried up as of late. :(
True. An old-school client that works well, with "modern" options like "Run it twice" etc.
All kind of games from the most popular to the most obscure.
Rakeback directly in your cashier the morning of the next day, without delays.
No documents to present to register and make withdrawals.
Withdrawals in BTC hit your wallet in a few hours max.
But very few players... 120, 150 maximum 200.
It should be at least 10,000, since you can play in almost every country in the world, without restrictions.
These are the mysteries of life, like those bands that should fill arenas all over the world but instead play in dive bars .:shocked: 
:(
This popek guy is "FreeMarketCapitalist" on bitcointalk, a member with 'legendary' status. I assume he didn't want to taint that account with suspicion of collusion so he created the popek1990 account on there to complain about getting caught ma'ing. He then posted in support of popek as FMC and trashed anyone who presented opinions or evidence of his cheating. Collusion is as clear as daylight in the hh's he posted.
Makes sense that someone willing to multi a poker site has no qualms about doing it on a forum either. Glad you got caught you cheating scumbag.
bsop series starts next week. if you previously won a bsop event you have a ticket to the bracelet winners freerollon the 18th(bsop exclusive, holiday series and other non bsop series dont count).
gl
If you are having problems with SWC Poker, you can check out the alternative bitcoin poker sites from this review - https://www.tuttotek.it/igaming .
https://twoplustwo.com/Discussion-of-Pok...
I read this post and can't help but think about SWC.
It's failing to attract players at all.
How is this possible?
I've read everywhere that American players are increasingly finding fewer rooms to play in, and here, instead, no KYC fast BTC withdrawals and good software.
If Coinpoker right now has 3,436 players online, SWC should have at least the same number, not 137.
https://twoplustwo.com/Discussion-of-Pok...I read this post and can't help but think about SWC.It's failing to attract players at all.How is this possible?I've read everywhere that American players are increasingly finding fewer rooms to play in, and here, instead, no KYC fast BTC withdrawals an
Coin markets towards poker players, SWC markets towards crypto people. There are rarely any games running on seals, and random people aren't looking to sign up and game start.
On a broader scale, I think the seals team is a very small number of people (like 2 or 3) who got rich by taking rake when btc was low and 100+x'ed that amount over time. I'd guess they are happy to sit back and let the handful of regs battle it out while they maintain their profits.
do they have there rng tested for randomness?
Played a few thousand hands there. Played millions of Hands on Stars an other sites but never seen so much paired flops there. insane
trying to login after a long hiatus. i know i have the correct email. it said it will send me an email to reset password but never got the email. hoping I had some btc sitting in the account from years back. checked the junk folder and regular folder. nothing.
How much is 1 ubtc or 1 chip worth on seals with clubs in usd? approximately? am i correct in thinking once chip is worth around 11 cents?
How much is 1 ubtc or 1 chip worth on seals with clubs in usd? approximately? am i correct in thinking once chip is worth around 11 cents?
1 million chips = 1 bitcoin
