President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
trump should just order the DOJ to stop prosecuting any federal criminal allegation where the purported victim is a registered democrat, according to you that would be perfectly legal
**** are you talking about? I was correcting your (clearly bad faith) interpretation of the wording of a specific statute.
And then in Lozenesque fashion, a bizarre whataboutism to try to prove some inane parallel point instead of owning up to the lie.
And then in Lozenesque fashion, a bizarre whataboutism to try to prove some inane parallel point instead of owning up to the lie.
there is and was no lie. I thought that law mandated the admin (through the DOJ) to deport all the illegals they had in custody that qualified under the listed provisions.
D2 claims that's an option not a mandate.
might be right.
but the "take care" clause wasn't discussed by you guys and refusing to apply laws for political gains shouldn't be allowed under the take care clause.
which is why I suggest trump should start refusing to prosecute crimes against democrats if it's instead legal to do so, which it must be if refusing to deport illegals in custody is as you guys claim.
I was responding only to the excerpt you posted, which mandates some party to take action in the event the AG orders it, but does not in and of itself mandate the AG to order anything. I have no idea what the language elsewhere in the statute mandates.
**** are you talking about? I was correcting your (clearly bad faith) interpretation of the wording of a specific statute.
there is no bad faith , as the wording is the same used to allow prosecution of most crimes.
if it is not mandatory for Biden to deport illegals in custody it isn't mandatory for trump to ever prosecute anyone who allegedly committed a crime against democrats.
trump should declare open season on democrats in DC where only federal law applies, after all, D2 claims that's perfectly legal and thinking otherwise is bad faith.
everything about the DOJ in the law is full of "shalls" related to the AG.
I guess they are all optionals otherwise... bad faith
What are you talking about ???You don’t believe many people in all countries in the world gets exploited one way or the other lol ? This isnt due to capitalism, it’s about politics choices .But again if you believe they would have been better off without globalization , I wonder why massive amounts of people being lift out of poverty the last 3 decades didn’t
Trade is huge but technology is the primary reason.
There’s not really any difference in the reasons for it. It all comes down to exploiting people to extract wealth.
Imperialism has to do with pursuing power, the fact that governments will ally with corporations does not change that. The alliance existed, and still exists, only because it is probably the easiest way to amass power on a global scale. But ofc, to get max power over your own people, while still keeping some semblance of a democracy, populism is probably your best bet.
Keep in mind Stalin, Mao etc were as power hungry as any western imperialist, so in no way capitalism is the only evil system in town, I don't think pure free market capitalism is evil at all tbh, it's just that governments make it bad.
**** are you talking about? I was correcting your (clearly bad faith) interpretation of the wording of a specific statute.
there is no bad faith, as the wording is the same used to allow prosecution of most crimes.if it is not mandatory for Biden to deport illegals in custody it isn't mandatory for trump to ever prosecute anyone who allegedly committed a crime against democrats.
You are a complete psychopath and on your way to a mass shooting.
there is no bad faith , as the wording is the same used to allow prosecution of most crimes.if it is not mandatory for Biden to deport illegals in custody it isn't mandatory for trump to ever prosecute anyone who allegedly committed a crime against democrats. trump should declare open season on democrats in DC where only federal law applies, after all, D2 claims that's perfectl
Responding to posts like this garbage logic provides the oxygen for the fire that causes Luciom to post his every thought on every subject here. It would be appreciated if we could all refrain from constructively arguing any of these points with him. It is a version of the raw milk,/Supreme Court order/ facilitating argument that the nazi lives for.
There’s not really any difference in the reasons for it. It all comes down to exploiting people to extract wealth.
Yes. The motivations and reasons for why the US and the Soviet Union did what they did in their spheres of influence following WWII are the same. The Japanese miracle is an excellent argument for western capitalism precisely because it doesn’t require a country of selfless angels that abolishing capitalism wouldn’t create anyway.
nope I am saying what the consequences of the absurd claim that the government doesn't have a mandate to deport llegals in custody would be.
it would mean no mandate to uphold any federal law at all.
the open season would be a legal option if your friends there are right and disregarding the law in full is legal for the president.
I am glad you realize the corollary of your friends opinion is absurd
Embarrassing holiday meltdown, as is tradition...
You can tell he knows jackshit about the Bible, because if he did, he'd undoubtedly compare himself to Jesus being persecuted.
Embarrassing holiday meltdown, as is tradition...You can tell he knows jackshit about the Bible, because if he did, he'd undoubtedly compare himself to Jesus being persecuted.
He did compare himself to Jesus last year at Easter
Embarrassing holiday meltdown, as is tradition...You can tell he knows jackshit about the Bible, because if he did, he'd undoubtedly compare himself to Jesus being persecuted.
In a sane world, just one of these posts would be grounds for removal from office imho.
Ah yes the old saying because I tend to me more liberal then conservative I can’t understand economics ….
But if for you the concept of competition is about exploiting people then I don’t have anything more to say shrug .
"Shall, upon order of the AG" means "has to if and when the AG orders it", but you knew that.
Obviously this. Luciom's argument is embarrassing, even for the reader.
Embarrassing holiday meltdown, as is tradition...You can tell he knows jackshit about the Bible, because if he did, he'd undoubtedly compare himself to Jesus being persecuted.
Great tweet. All true of course.
Very generous of him to wish his enemies a happy Easter as well.
