NL 10 - Was this a bad bluff?

NL 10 - Was this a bad bluff?

PokerStars - $0.10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

UTG: 173.9 BB
CO: 379.4 BB
BTN: 100 BB
SB: 145.4 BB
Hero (BB): 130.5 BB

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has J A

fold, fold, fold, SB raises to 2 BB, Hero raises to 8 BB, SB calls 6 BB

Flop: (16 BB, 2 players) K 5 9
SB checks, Hero bets 9 BB, SB calls 9 BB

Turn: (34 BB, 2 players) 8
SB checks, Hero checks

River: (34 BB, 2 players) 7
SB checks, Hero bets 32 BB, SB calls 32 BB

Hero shows J A (High Card, Ace)
(Pre 64%, Flop 26%, Turn 14%)
SB shows 9 Q (One Pair, Nines)
(Pre 36%, Flop 74%, Turn 86%)
SB wins 93.1 BB

22 March 2025 at 05:04 AM
Reply...

4 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

Its a bad bluff cuz you would never check your strong hands on the turn

Had you bet the turn and river, I would say its fine - repping super strong hands only and can get alot of folds there


Turn is probably mandatory check after bigger bet flop.

River isnt great. This is a good card for your opponent and bad for you. You probably have less than 10 combos of JT and 7x. You are fine by only bluffing QJ balance wise. At 10nl, you might win by checking a very small percentage. With such a big bet, I think vilain would to fold way stronger than Q9 to make it worth, but a smaller bet is too easy to get called by everything. Bet check bet is a line that microstakes like to call down.


I dont think its a bad bluff


by whatwhytypethis

I dont think its a bad bluff

reason being you are just pot controling the turn for broadway draw, u can bet big to protect it

or

u can control to see the river and bet if the potential broadway is a brick

Reply...