The "LOLCANADA" thread...again
So what's new?
I've noticed the Liberals are now ahead in all major polls and Trudeau hasn't even started to campaign yet
Trump "endorsing" Carney on TV is so great. They don't have the first idea how obvious that is, and how much it makes everyone immediately understand how much he prefers Pierre.
What a failed attempt at second level thinking, lol.
It's funny because no matter what Trump said the Canadian media and Liberals would spin it their way and dumb people just lap it up.
so basically, politicos spinning whatever Trump says their way is really really bad precisely when…….your enemies do it.
What's Pierre spinning when he says Trump endorsed Carney? I guess you could argue he also said he doesn't care who wins. Probably because Canada is in such a bad position it doesn't really matter who's in charge to him.
I mean come on, you can't tell me that wasn't completely transparent from Trump Shifty...
lmao. My dude just got mad at supposed “mind reading” of Trump while Poilievre is mind readings and spinning away:
He said the president wants "weak, compromised and conflicted leadership.… That's why he endorsed Mark Carney yesterday."
Ironically despite all your whining about spin and mind reading from liberals, it seems Carney has stayed above the fray here, rather unlike your guy.
Amazing how easily you let me own you over and over and over on everything to do with Trump huh.
Thought this was about as good a response as there can be
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics...
The Prime Minister was asked Tuesday by media during a visit to Iqaluit whether he shared the opinion of predecessor Justin Trudeau that U.S. President Donald Trump’s conduct toward Canada is economic warfare designed to bring about a “total collapse of the Canadian economy because that’ll make it easier to annex us.”
Mr. Carney declined to say whether he agreed with Mr. Trudeau and spoke in a conciliatory manner about how he understood Mr. Trump’s rationale for his actions.
“He wants to end the fentanyl crisis in the United States. I respect that,” Mr. Carney said. “He wants good, high-paying jobs in America. He wants more investment in America. He wants repatriation of many American industries and firms to the United States. And I fully respect that.”
Asked what he would say in a future phone call with Mr. Trump, Mr. Carney said the United States’ behaviour in recent months – threatening and applying tariffs to a country that has a free-trade agreement with Washington and is integrated with the U.S. economy – has raised concerns.
“There are a series of trade initiatives from the U.S., such that they have called into question the validity of the USMCA,” Mr. Carney said, referring to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
“That means that we should have a broader conversation about our commercial relationship, which also involves a conversation about our security relationship, with the United States,” the Prime Minister said.
“So I’m less interested in reacting to every initiative,” Mr. Carney said, adding he was “putting on the table that we want to have that broader conversation.” He acknowledged this won’t happen overnight. “There’s no one, magic meeting that is going to unlock things.”
And why did they buy the pipeline?
Here is a reality the feds can complete a pipeline and oil could be at record production and the feds can put up many road blocks that would allow for more production and a safer way to transport it and open new markets. Yet Justin and his Environment minister made it near impossible with bills like Bill C69
The private sector don’t want anything to do with it .
Too risky ,too costly
I think were forgetting the real problems with all this trump nonsense the economy
nothing I have seen is going to get Canadians to stop investing in housing and instead invest in industry.
We have had no real growth this decade. luckily we were a very good country a decade ago so we have some buffer
I think were forgetting the real problems with all this trump nonsense the economy nothing I have seen is going to get Canadians to stop investing in housing and instead invest in industry.We have had no real growth this decade. luckily we were a very good country a decade ago so we have some buffer
I wonder what changed the last 9 or 10 years ?
Oh right we had an elected idiot
Correct Risky because you could jump through all the hoops and still not get the project approved which costs you will never recover
Some decent data already coming out on how Russia/China/USA are pushing to interfere with the Canadian election. Anyone want to guess who they want to win?
Seriously if you vote alongside Russian and American interests in this election, ask yourself what EXACTLY you're voting for.
There's never been a clearer 1 issue election in my entire lifetime.
Some decent data already coming out on how Russia/China/USA are pushing to interfere with the Canadian election. Anyone want to guess who they want to win?
Seriously if you vote alongside Russian and American interests in this election, ask yourself what EXACTLY you're voting for.
There's never been a clearer 1 issue election in my entire lifetime.
and that would be ?
The resistance/defence against Imperialism.
But I have zero interest in debating it. The intellectual capacity and historical acumen of the subject matter experts spelling it out line for line right now are the ones I rely on to make this decision. And I mean REAL historians and geopolitical geniuses, not Tucker Carlson.
In 4 years you probably see me vote conservative, if Trump is in the ground and we no longer have a Russian asset running the most powerful nation in the world. But till then? I'm voting exactly against Russian interests. EXACTLY.
I don’t know, you said it was bad for people to spin and mind read trumps remakes. Then I quoted your guy doing that. And pointed out Carney didn’t. So at this point I’m just laughing at you and hoping yet another episode of shifty losing am exchange about Trump will teach you something.
In 4 years you probably see me vote conservative, if Trump is in the ground and we no longer have a Russian asset running the most powerful nation in the world. But till then? I'm voting exactly against Russian interests. EXACTLY.
I wonder if Canada and the EU being reliant on foreign energy helps Russia/USA and China more or less.
I don’t know, you said it was bad for people to spin and mind read trumps remakes. Then I quoted your guy doing that. And pointed out Carney didn’t. So at this point I’m just laughing at you and hoping yet another episode of shifty losing am exchange about Trump will teach you something.
Trump wants to annex Canada, says he'd rather deal with the liberals. I wonder why. I never said Carney did.
We had a moral obligation to stop climate change. That's much more important than growth. I'm sure if we elect all the same people again it will change.
This is such a silly approach to politics. Shifty seems to want to endlessly mock the idea of every country having a moral responsibility to reduce emissions proportional to their size. Ok, that’s, uh, ok. But the way he tries to insert it as sort of the only factor to ever consider is really silly. Canada’s productivity stagnation is undoubtably a significant problem, but it is highly multifactorial and a narrative of it being due to trying to work on climate change as anything more than one factor amongst many is silly. Consider for instance that Canada has had record oil and gas output under Trudeau, and that our productivity is stagnant compared to peer countries that also have things like carbon taxes.
Trump wants to annex Canada, says he'd rather deal with the liberals. I wonder why. I never said Carney did.
Sounds like you want to mind read Trump and spin it to your side.
The thing you said was bad.
That your guy shamefully did, but you didn’t condemn him. Just amorphous liberals. Not mark carney, who didn’t do the bad thing unlike your guy, just some other unnamed and unquoted liberals.
Is your politics just explainable by projection all the way down?
Sounds like you want to mind read Trump and spin it to your side.
The thing you said was bad.
That your guy shamefully did, but you didn’t condemn him. Just amorphous liberals. Not mark carney, who didn’t do the bad thing unlike your guy, just some other unnamed and unquoted liberals.
Is your politics just explainable by projection all the way down?
Lol ok pal.
