President Donald J. Trump (for Trumper supporters)
I was able to fix the thread title by creating a new thread. Howboudat
Media hasn't been pro Democrat in about 20 years. You continue to push delusional fantasies that are easily disproven
I think you live in an alternative reality if you believe this. even neutral parties ranking media bias would tell you allajor newspapers and all major cable networks except fox news have a strong pro democrat bias
Let's get this straight. Trump is:
1. Taking away vaccines
2. Selling National Parks
3. Ending Social Security
4. Ending elections
5. Deporting all brown people
6. Sending all the trannys to guantanamo
....what else did I miss?
You are all paranoid delusional schizos.
I was only correcting your lies. Obviously you’re free to practice your form of astrology. I’m under no delusions about my abilities to teach rurals and magas jr high science.
How'd those jabby jabs work out for everyone?
I'm guessing you actually thought wearing surgical masks in public had an effect on transmission of the virus backed by science and that masking outweighed it's detrimental effects too?
Btw, Ivermectin was more than proven to be effective for covid. I read many studies citing it's effects but try to deflect and cherry pick your data like always.
Two years ago 7% of of Americans were against our support for Ukraine. Today it's 42%.
62% Republicans against it. The MAJORITY of Americans love what Trump has done his first month in office. The minority is getting smaller and smaller. They're just so batshit crazy that they tend to make a scene.
Yeah. What are they talking about? We had weeks of speculation in the right-wing media that the lapse in security was attributable to DEI hiring in the Secret Service.
I think you live in an alternative reality if you believe this. even neutral parties ranking media bias would tell you allajor newspapers and all major cable networks except fox news have a strong pro democrat bias
Then neutral parties would be ******ed.
CNN giving centrist takes with a .1 degree skew towards the left doesn't make up for Fox news spewing abject right wing propaganda to 6x the viewership
Total views + Total Skew is probably 10x more tilted to the right than left.
Thats how intelligent people ingest statistics btw. Its not just a flat 2 number division. Its complex combinations of projections and probabilities
No one watches legacy media anymore. It's gasping it's last breath of air. Podcasts and independent news is the future. Thus, no one gives a **** what you think of fox news because they're irrelevant now.
CNN .1 left of center??...you completely discredited any take you have on the subject.
48% in a heavily skewed poll to the left means majority irl.
I can confirm.
Spoiler
Lunch on a summer's day.
I need to up my apple consumption.
Does it help if I buy Apple products? What's an iPhone worth in apple consumption, on average?
No one watches legacy media anymore. It's gasping it's last breath of air. Podcasts and independent news is the future. Thus, no one gives a **** what you think of fox news because they're irrelevant now.
CNN .1 left of center??...you completely discredited any take you have on the subject.
You ingest such deep right wing propaganda that you think the mildest of left leans is woke mind virus which immediately discredits you from making claims on objective reality
btw Fox gets 2x the viewership CNN and MSNBC get combined
Then neutral parties would be ******ed.CNN giving centrist takes with a .1 degree skew towards the left doesn't make up for Fox news spewing abject right wing propaganda to 6x the viewershipTotal views + Total Skew is probably 10x more tilted to the right than left.Thats how intelligent people ingest statistics btw. Its not just a flat 2 number division. Its complex combinati
CNN was all'in on "climate change" and trans rights every day of every week of every month from 2021 till the summer of 2024.
Topics were the normal rightwing American would have burnt down the whole house declaring they were obscene partisan communist .
And you know that. Think of CNN coverage of the terrorist BLM movement.
A neutral coverage of BLM would have depicted it as a monstrous eversive large group of people with corporate and political help hell-bent on destroying the country based on a complete absurd made up lie (that blacks were killed by police more than they deserved).
That's neutral. A rightwing partisan coverage would have required the arrest of all democrats in favor of BLM as terrorists.
Yeah. What are they talking about? We had weeks of speculation in the right-wing media that the lapse in security was attributable to DEI hiring in the Secret Service.
We re talking about the fact that the name of the killer isn't a household name. It was repeated hundreds of times which would have been the bare minimum of coverage for such an event, for example.
If you ask 100 random people on the street today about that guy and 80 don't answer with details about his name and personal life, that's proof it hasn't been covered enough. It should have been the main news every day for months, something everyone who was alive that day will remember with the clarity of his marriage day for the rest of his life.
And after that ANOTHER democrat operative tried to kill him AGAIN and that was talked about what, 10 minutes?
People who aren't evil morons,
Luciom won. It's his world. You're just living in it, until he has you shot.
Pretty well. Meta studies showed a sharp decline in deaths and hospitalizations in communities with high vaccination rates and a huge contrast to low vaxed communities.
Btw, Ivermectin was more than proven to be effective for covid. I read many studies citing it's effects but try to deflect and cherry pick your data like always.
It hasn't and you don't have the basic competence to understand the data. I could go into any non rural Jr high and find kids that could adequately find and explain the data.
lol arguing about the scientific validity of vaccinations is 2nd nut low of stupid, just beaten out by flat-earthers.
We re talking about the fact that the name of the killer isn't a household name. It was repeated hundreds of times which would have been the bare minimum of coverage for such an event, for example.If you ask 100 random people on the street today about that guy and 80 don't answer with details about his name and personal life, that's proof it hasn't been covered enough. It shoul
This is one of your most laughable claims. In the last forty years, there have been a bunch of assassination plots against U.S. presidents from both parties (including other plots against Trump). More than a few of those plots progressed to the point of firing a gun, mailing a pipe bomb, mailing ricin, throwing a live grenade, etc.
I don't remember the name of any of those perpetrators. No one does. The only reason people know John Hinkley's name is because he somehow managed to seriously wound Reagan and because he had such a bizarre reason for attacking Reagan.
We re talking about the fact that the name of the killer isn't a household name. It was repeated hundreds of times which would have been the bare minimum of coverage for such an event, for example.If you ask 100 random people on the street today about that guy and 80 don't answer with details about his name and personal life, that's proof it hasn't been covered enough. It shoul
Why aren’t Fox/Newsmax/ONE etc covering this like crazy? They have spots in the WH press room now and are all-in on covering decades of liberal corruption at the FBI.
They just in on it too?
Proved my point because no one watches CNN and MSNBC. They're being propped up by tax dollars. Their ad revenue doesn't come close to covering the contracts of their hosts.
A neutral coverage of BLM would have depicted it as a monstrous eversive large group of people with corporate and political help hell-bent on destroying the country based on a complete absurd made up lie (that blacks were killed by police more than they deserved).
OF COURSE you don't believe the thoroughly proven fact that the US justice system is biased against black people (among others).
You also think corporate war-hawk media entity CNN is somehow "Communist", when in reality any actual Communist regime would fire Jake Tapper and Don Lemon and these other clowns on day 1, dissolve CNN, spit on Ted Turner's grave, and equitably redistribute CNN's remaining profits to the lower-level workers from the entity.
if CNN is "leftist", what the hell am I? Ultra-omega-GOATed-leftist?
Center-of-the-road (except for when it comes to propping up the US military-industrial complex) ass CNN. FOH
Luciom, in all of your thousands of posts, do you think you have EVER got anybody to change their mind about any relevant political fact or position? Your dedication to pointlessness is truly pathological.
Luciom, in all of your thousands of posts, do you think you have EVER got anybody to change their mind about any relevant political fact or position? Your dedication to pointlessness is truly pathological.
I think the amazing thing is he thinks his positions are not only reasonable, but that most people* share them.
*People being defined as those approved to live in his ideal world.
